Banyan Tree Holdings Limited’s (SGX:B58) most recent return on equity was a substandard 3.76% relative to its industry performance of 5.42% over the past year. B58’s results could indicate a relatively inefficient operation to its peers, and while this may be the case, it is important to understand what ROE is made up of and how it should be interpreted. Knowing these components could change your view on B58’s performance. Metrics such as financial leverage can impact the level of ROE which in turn can affect the sustainability of B58’s returns. Let me show you what I mean by this. Check out our latest analysis for Banyan Tree Holdings

Breaking down Return on Equity

Firstly, Return on Equity, or ROE, is simply the percentage of last years’ earning against the book value of shareholders’ equity. For example, if the company invests SGD1 in the form of equity, it will generate SGD0.04 in earnings from this. While a higher ROE is preferred in most cases, there are several other factors we should consider before drawing any conclusions.

Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders Equity

Returns are usually compared to costs to measure the efficiency of capital. Banyan Tree Holdings’s cost of equity is 15.52%. Since Banyan Tree Holdings’s return does not cover its cost, with a difference of -11.76%, this means its current use of equity is not efficient and not sustainable. Very simply, Banyan Tree Holdings pays more for its capital than what it generates in return. ROE can be broken down into three different ratios: net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. This is called the Dupont Formula:

Dupont Formula

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = (annual net profit ÷ sales) × (sales ÷ assets) × (assets ÷ shareholders’ equity)

ROE = annual net profit ÷ shareholders’ equity

Essentially, profit margin shows how much money the company makes after paying for all its expenses. Asset turnover reveals how much revenue can be generated from Banyan Tree Holdings’s asset base. And finally, financial leverage is simply how much of assets are funded by equity, which exhibits how sustainable the company’s capital structure is. Since ROE can be inflated by excessive debt, we need to examine Banyan Tree Holdings’s debt-to-equity level. Currently the debt-to-equity ratio stands at a balanced 91.71%, which means its ROE is driven by its ability to grow its profit without a significant debt burden.

Next Steps:

While ROE is a relatively simple calculation, it can be broken down into different ratios, each telling a different story about the strengths and weaknesses of a company. Banyan Tree Holdings exhibits a weak ROE against its peers, as well as insufficient levels to cover its own cost of equity this year. Although, its appropriate level of leverage means investors can be more confident in the sustainability of Banyan Tree Holdings’s return with a possible increase should the company decide to increase its debt levels. Although ROE can be a useful metric, it is only a small part of diligent research.

For Banyan Tree Holdings, I’ve put together three pertinent aspects you should further examine:

• 1. Financial Health: Does it have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.

• 2. Valuation: What is Banyan Tree Holdings worth today? Is the stock undervalued, even when its growth outlook is factored into its intrinsic value? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether Banyan Tree Holdings is currently mispriced by the market.

• 3. Other High-Growth Alternatives : Are there other high-growth stocks you could be holding instead of Banyan Tree Holdings? Explore our interactive list of stocks with large growth potential to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!

To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.