Unlock stock picks and a broker-level newsfeed that powers Wall Street.
XRP Rallies as Ripple Submits Response to the SEC’s Hinman Claims

In This Article:

Key Insights:

  • On Friday, XRP rallied by 9.8% to shake off the heavy losses of Wednesday and Thursday.

  • The upside came as the Ripple defense team submitted a reply to the SEC’s brief on the Hinman documents.

  • Key technical indicators bearish. XRP sits well below the 50-day EMA.

On Friday, XRP rallied by 9.81%. Reversing a 7.44% slide from Thursday, XRP ended the day at $0.3843. The upside came amidst the market focus on Friday’s SEC v Ripple court date.

A broad-based crypto rally delivered XRP support as the markets looked to move on from the TerraUST (UST) de-pegging and the demise of Terra LUNA.

Market forces shifted in response to Tether (USDT) moving back toward parity against the dollar. On Thursday, USDT had fallen back to $0.95 levels, raising concerns of another stablecoin collapse.

Ripple Defendants Submit Reply to SEC Brief on Hinman Docs

On Friday, Ripple Defendants filed a reply to the SEC Attorney-Client Privilege claims concerning the famous William Hinman speech and notes.

Defense attorney James Filan shared the Ripple response on Twitter.

Addressed to Judge Sarah Netburn, the Ripple defense team wrote that the SEC claims are wrong for the following reasons,

  • “The record, in this case, demonstrates that Mr. Hinman delivered his speech in his personal capacity.

    • He sought input from SEC colleagues as to how best to package his remarks.

    • That certain colleagues discussed legal concepts in some of their responses does not imbue them with attorney-client privilege.

    • Second circuit law makes it clear that advice on policy or messaging issues, even for lawyers, is not protected by the attorney-client privilege.

  • While Mr. Hinman was entitled to communicate with SEC lawyers and to receive privileged legal advice when discharging his role as the Director of Corporation Finance, communications about the substance of his personal remarks are not within the scope of any such attorney-client relationship.

  • The communications at issue involve no confidential information concerning the agency that would be protected by the attorney-client privilege.

  • Even if the SEC could establish the elements of the privilege – which it does not – the SEC at most would have identified a privilege claim that it lacks standing to assert because the privilege would belong to Mr. Hinman.

Waiting for permission
Allow microphone access to enable voice search

Try again.