Why trucking embraces alarming turnover rates
truck driver
We can't seem to agree on whether trucking needs more drivers, or a restructuring of the whole industry. Probably one is easier to solve than the other. (Photo: Jim Allen/FreightWaves)

CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas — I spent a few days early this month at a truck driver training conference — and I enjoyed an unexpected opportunity to grapple with trucking’s deepest chasm!

The most fundamental disagreement in this fair industry, perhaps, is whether we are in the midst of a truck driver shortage. Trucking associations say fleets struggle to hire drivers, while researchers have repeatedly concluded that there is no evidence for a long-term labor shortage in trucking. Instead, these companies struggle with massive turnover rates.

The discourse around a truck driver shortage has larger implications than an intellectual spar. Lawmakers believe such a shortage exists. They have set aside taxpayer money at the local, state and federal levels to provide funding for truck driver training.

And there’s an entire association built around connecting schools with public cash: the National Association of Publicly-Funded Truck Driving Schools. It is also called NAPFTDS.

I wanted to meet the people involved in this group. So on Nov. 1, I headed to Corpus Christi, Texas, to attend the NAPFTDS Region Four meeting. Region Four is made up of Texas, Kansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Louisiana and Arkansas.

I learned that these schools have an important role in bringing up the next cohort of truck drivers. But it’s unclear where the leaders of America’s $875 billion trucking industry should direct resources. Should they focus their attention on bringing in new drivers — or rethink how those drivers are treated once they’re employed? And should they try to get as many people as possible into schools — or keep classes small?


There are public safety reasons for figuring out how to boost driver retention. A federal study from 2017 showed that less experienced drivers are more likely to cause a serious accident. A truck driver with less than three years of experience, for example, is 47% more likely to cause an accident than one with more than three years on the road, according to the analysis.

Improving retention rather than increasing the potential number of drivers might seem to be the obvious answer to an outside observer. But under the current conditions of the trucking industry, fleets aren’t incentivized to do that. It’s just not as profitable — and trucking is ruled by what University of Pennsylvania sociologist Steve Viscelli calls “destructive competition.”

As a group of researchers led by Stephen Burks of the University of Minnesota Morris found in a 2023 paper, high turnover among truckload carriers is “likely structural.” They found that paying drivers more in an effort to reduce costly turnover was ultimately less profitable than paying drivers less and having higher turnover.