Weiss Crypto Ratings Drops EOS Over Centralization Concerns but Who Cares
The Weiss ranking has downgraded EOS over 'serious' centralization concerns. | Source: Shutterstock
The Weiss ranking has downgraded EOS over 'serious' centralization concerns. | Source: Shutterstock

By CCN Markets: Weiss Crypto Ratings on Friday announced that it is downgrading the technology score of EOS, a blockchain protocol developed and distributed by Block.one.

eos, eos usd
eos, eos usd

EOS Downgraded by Weiss Rating Over Centralization Issues | Source: Weiss Crypto Ratings

The US-based economic research agency said EOS has “serious problems with centralization,” three months after it put the project among the top three blockchains alongside Ripple and Bitcoin. Weiss argued that Block.one has taken no necessary steps to improve the protocol, adding that not even the firm’s event last week, wherein it announced Voice, an upcoming social media platform taking on a behemoth rival in Facebook, did anything to alleviate the centralization issues.

“It’s now up to ADA to launch a truly decentralized POS blockchain,” said Weiss.

Weiss is Untrustworthy

Weiss’ take on EOS, nevertheless, appeared drastic than well-researched. Earlier, the agency continuously placed the Block.one’s protocol atop other blockchain projects, calling it A-grade. The favorable rating came despite multiple reports/complaints finding the centralized nature of the EOS blockchain. Los Angeles-based Whiteblock, for instance, called EOS a glorified cloud computing service that lacked blockchain’s most essential features, like immutability.

The Whiteblock report made to the wire in November 2018, four months before Weiss awarded EOS the top position on their best blockchain projects’ list. The scenario proves that Weiss hugely ignored certain fundamental aspects while rating EOS higher than other blockchain projects.

Viktor Bunin, a protocol specialist at Bison Trails, believes no one should trust Weiss ratings on cryptocurrencies and blockchain projects because of it’s broken and opaque “proprietary” methodology.

Read the full story on CCN.com.