Be Wary Of Randstad (AMS:RAND) And Its Returns On Capital

In This Article:

When it comes to investing, there are some useful financial metrics that can warn us when a business is potentially in trouble. When we see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) in conjunction with a declining base of capital employed, that's often how a mature business shows signs of aging. This reveals that the company isn't compounding shareholder wealth because returns are falling and its net asset base is shrinking. Having said that, after a brief look, Randstad (AMS:RAND) we aren't filled with optimism, but let's investigate further.

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Randstad:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.12 = €631m ÷ (€11b - €5.5b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).

So, Randstad has an ROCE of 12%. In isolation, that's a pretty standard return but against the Professional Services industry average of 15%, it's not as good.

See our latest analysis for Randstad

roce
ENXTAM:RAND Return on Capital Employed November 10th 2024

In the above chart we have measured Randstad's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Randstad .

What Can We Tell From Randstad's ROCE Trend?

In terms of Randstad's historical ROCE movements, the trend doesn't inspire confidence. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 16% that they were earning five years ago. Meanwhile, capital employed in the business has stayed roughly the flat over the period. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect Randstad to turn into a multi-bagger.

On a separate but related note, it's important to know that Randstad has a current liabilities to total assets ratio of 50%, which we'd consider pretty high. This can bring about some risks because the company is basically operating with a rather large reliance on its suppliers or other sorts of short-term creditors. While it's not necessarily a bad thing, it can be beneficial if this ratio is lower.

In Conclusion...

In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. Despite the concerning underlying trends, the stock has actually gained 7.8% over the last five years, so it might be that the investors are expecting the trends to reverse. Either way, we aren't huge fans of the current trends and so with that we think you might find better investments elsewhere.