In This Article:
We recently published a list of Jim Cramer Recently Looked Into These 8 Stocks. In this article, we are going to take a look at where Walmart Inc. (NYSE:WMT) stands against other stocks that Jim Cramer recently analyzed.
Jim Cramer, the host of Mad Money, took to the airwaves last Friday to discuss the recent stir caused by DeepSeek in the tech world. Cramer highlighted that we’re in the midst of what he described as the most chaotic two weeks of earnings season.
He noted that last week alone, nearly 20% of S&P 500 companies reported their results, with another quarter of the index set to follow this week. On top of that, Cramer pointed to the selloff in AI stocks sparked by DeepSeek’s revelations, ongoing political turmoil in Washington, and a number of high-profile earnings reports, all of which have made it nearly impossible to keep track of everything happening at once.
READ ALSO: Jim Cramer Looked Closely At These 10 Stocks and Jim Cramer’s Thoughts on These 7 Stocks
“We learned that maybe just maybe we don’t need to buy as many of those chips as we thought a Chinese outfit called DeepSeek has purportedly figured out a way to get much more out of NVIDIA’s cheaper, lower-end chips, which makes you wonder why should anybody buy the most expensive ones?”
Cramer noted that, according to DeepSeek, it managed to train an AI model for a mere $6 million, a fraction of the hundreds of millions typically required for such endeavors. DeepSeek’s claim was that their cheaper approach might even result in performance that’s as good, if not better, than what’s possible with the highest-end hardware available.
For Cramer, this announcement was unsettling. He reflected on how, for a brief moment, the tech world accepted DeepSeek’s bold claim as fact. The consensus seemed to be that DeepSeek, a company backed by a Chinese hedge fund, had effectively disrupted the semiconductor giant’s ability to command high prices for its products. However, Cramer began to question the full accuracy of this narrative. What if DeepSeek wasn’t being entirely transparent about the true cost of its hardware? What if the $6 million figure they reported was far lower than the actual expenses? He explained:
“And that’s what an article and a known authority called SemiAnalysis said today. This publication, which has covered DeepSeek for longer than most people knew it existed, speculates that the $6 million cost is highly misleading. They say DeepSeek’s real hardware spending, all in, could be more than $1.6 billion. Hmm, I wonder if the PRC’s subsidizing them.”