China and the United States should discuss "a wide range of strategic stability issues" to built trust and avoid "irreversible consequences", analysts from both countries have said.
The report, from the Beijing-based think tank Grandview Institution, warned that the two sides' different understandings of "strategic stability" could hinder effective communication, but it said finding common ground is essential if the two nuclear powers are to prevent misunderstandings.
"It is imperative for China and the United States to engage in dialogue on a wide range of strategic stability issues in the future," said the authors in a report published a week before the US presidential election.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
The study was written by Zhu Junwei, director of the Centre for American Studies at the Grandview Institution, David Allison, an associate of the Project on Managing the Atom at Harvard Kennedy School, and Alexandre Debs and Arne Westad from Yale University.
Although high-level military talks have been intensifying in recent months, it was confirmed in July that talks on arms control and nuclear non-proliferation had been halted.
Both sides realise that ensuring strategic stability has extended beyond nuclear weapons, the report said, but there is a considerable gap on what broader security issues must be discussed.
They said the US does not think its nuclear units and early warning systems near China-an area of significant concern for Beijing- need to be discussed, while Washington is concerned about China's military and technological buildup and its disputes with neighbouring countries over the South China Sea.
The report also said that because China has a much smaller nuclear arsenal, arms control talks along the lines of those held between Washington and Moscow during and after the Cold War are unlikely, but progress is possible if talks do not involve limiting China's nuclear capabilities or disarmament.
The authors expect that future talks on strategic stability will aim to improve understanding and "avoid crises or even irreversible consequences arising from misperception and miscalculations".
They also argued that setting up a dialogue mechanism could become a "source of mutual trust" between Beijing and Washington.
The report said this could start with clarifying key principles such as the two sides' nuclear policies, nuclear strategies and related doctrines and regulations.