Unlock stock picks and a broker-level newsfeed that powers Wall Street.
What Type Of Shareholder Owns Photocure ASA's (OB:PHO)?

In This Article:

Every investor in Photocure ASA (OB:PHO) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. Companies that have been privatized tend to have low insider ownership.

Photocure is a smaller company with a market capitalization of kr1.2b, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. In the chart below below, we can see that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholder can tell us about PHO.

View our latest analysis for Photocure

OB:PHO Ownership Summary, September 23rd 2019
OB:PHO Ownership Summary, September 23rd 2019

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Photocure?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors own 28% of Photocure. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone, since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Photocure's earnings history, below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

OB:PHO Income Statement, September 23rd 2019
OB:PHO Income Statement, September 23rd 2019

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Photocure. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of Photocure

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board; and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board, themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

I can report that insiders do own shares in Photocure ASA. It has a market capitalization of just kr1.2b, and insiders have kr50m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but I usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

With a 46% ownership, the general public have some degree of sway over PHO. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.