Trump's new Afghanistan strategy may draw on old, controversial methods

U.S. soldiers stand guard near the site of a U.S. bombing in the Achin district of Nangarhar province in eastern Afghanistan April 15, 2017. REUTERS/Parwiz
U.S. soldiers stand guard near the site of a U.S. bombing in the Achin district of Nangarhar province in eastern Afghanistan April 15, 2017. REUTERS/Parwiz

(US soldiers near the site of US bombing in the Achin district of eastern Afghanistan's Nangarhar province, April 15, 2017.Thomson Reuters)

In keeping with his elevation of military leaders to roles in policymaking, President Donald Trump has delegated the authority to set US troop levels in Afghanistan to Defense Secretary James Mattis, though that power reportedly comes with limits.

But the administration has yet to settle on an overarching strategy for the US's nearly 16-year-long campaign in the war-torn country.

And, according to The New York Times, Trump's advisers have turned to a controversial set of consultants to help develop their new Afghanistan policy.

Steve Bannon, Trump's chief strategist, and Jared Kushner, the president's senior adviser and son-in-law, called in Erik Prince, who founded the Blackwater private-security firm, and Stephen Feinberg, a billionaire who owns military contractor DynCorp, to create proposals to use contractors in Afghanistan rather than US troops.

According to the Times, Bannon was able to track down Mattis at the Pentagon on July 8 and brought in Prince and Feinberg to describe their proposal to the defense secretary.

Mattis, whom the Times said "listened politely," ultimately declined to include their ideas in his review of the war in Afghanistan, which he and National Security Adviser Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster are set to deliver to Trump this month.

U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Defense Secretary James Mattis (R) holds a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington, U.S. March 13, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Defense Secretary James Mattis (R) holds a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington, U.S. March 13, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

(President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary James Mattis at a cabinet meeting at the White House. March 13, 2017.Thomson Reuters)

Prince's proposal reportedly adhered to what he outlined in a Wall Street Journal op-ed earlier this year. In that editorial, he said the war in Afghanistan was "an expensive disaster" and called for "an American viceroy" in whom authority for the war would be consolidated. He also said the effort should take an "East India Company approach" using private military units working with local partners.

Prince and Feinberg's inclusion in the administration's Afghanistan policy-proposal process is of a piece with Trump's advisers' efforts to bring a wider array of options to the president's attention. While their proposal looks unlikely to be included in the final plan, their inclusion by Trump aides raised alarm among observers — and not only because of Blackwater's sordid record in Iraq.

Deborah Avant, a professor at the Josef Korbel School of International Studies at the University of Denver, pointed out a number of shortcomings in the plan Prince outlined in The Journal.

Blackwater Iraq
Blackwater Iraq

(US private security contractors investigate the site where a military armored bus was damaged by a roadside bomb Baghdad International Airport, November 27, 2004.Hadi Mizban/AP)