Trump, Sanders embrace competing versions of economic populism

In This Article:

The 2020 race is shaping up to be competing visions of economic populism between Senator Bernie Sanders and President Donald Trump.

In a development that experts say is a reflection of the public’s increasingly fraught relationship with unfettered free markets, virtually all major Democratic contenders have pushed populist platforms.

Those proposals contrast with — and sometimes emulate —Trump’s scattershot form of nationalism. The president’s ostensibly business-friendly agenda frequently involves using the levers of government to try and tip the scales in one direction or another.

In embracing a philosophy of “democratic socialism” at George Washington University on June 12, Sanders went after a host of actors, including President Donald Trump, Wall Street, fossil fuels and Amazon (AMZN) — one of the president’s favorite corporate punching bags (albeit for different reasons).

Sanders said, “while President Trump and his fellow oligarchs attack us for our support of democratic socialism, they don’t really oppose all forms of socialism.” He quoted Martin Luther King Jr. by charging the U.S. “has socialism for the rich, rugged individualism for the poor.”

A growing body of evidence suggests he might be on to something, especially as segments of the voting public appear more skeptical of capitalism.

Trump’s largest political victory in office was likely the massive tax reform, which greased the wheels of a stock market rally. In recent days, though, investors have become exasperated with the effects of Trump’s erratic economic policies, which at their core involve an activist federal government.

At various times, Trump has attempted to solve economic insecurity created by his trade wars by doling out billions to farmers affected; has attacked Amazon and car companies that cut jobs or shift production abroad; and has launched a failed attempt to block the AT&T-Time Warner (T) merger.

In some ways, Trump and the Democrats vying to unseat him have captured the post-2008 economic mood, economists say.

“In the immediate wake of the financial crisis a decade ago, the government came to the aid of the big banks, but not to many of the individual homeowners who borrowed from the big banks,” said William Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.