Titan implosion testimony paints a picture of reckless greed and explorer passion

Two weeks of testimony suggested the company responsible for an experimental deep-water submersible that imploded, killing five people, either recklessly ignored warning signs in the name of profits or represented the nation's explorer spirit in taking calculated risks to push humankind’s boundaries.

Those contrasting viewpoints emerged as the Coast Guard panel tasked with determining why the carbon-fiber Titan was lost 12,500 feet (3,810 meters) deep wrapped up testimony Friday with new information that could have changed how rescuers responded and more discussion of the company co-founder's cavalier attitude.

Capt. Jamie Frederick, commander of the Coast Guard sector based in Boston, appeared surprised to learn that the crew of Titan's support vessel, in hindsight, felt there was a slight shudder around the time the submersible imploded on its way to the wreckage of the Titanic last year.

Frederick said it was “unconscionable that they wouldn’t share that” and it could have changed the rescue response. “It certainly would’ve changed the equation,” he testified.

Also Friday, an OceanGate employee testified that he resigned after a “tense” conversation in which co-founder Stockton Rush told him the vessel would be flagged in the Bahamas and launched from Canada to avoid U.S. scrutiny — and arrogantly brushed aside U.S. regulatory concerns if it went to a U.S. port.

The worker, Matthew McCoy, said Rush told him: “If the Coast Guard became a problem, then he would buy himself a congressman and make it go away."

The public hearing concluded in the afternoon with condolences from a lawyer for OceanGate, a representative from the National Transportation Safety Board and Marine Board of Investigation Chair Jason Neubauer, who asked all in attendance to stand for a moment of silence for “those who perished” in the tragedy.

Neubauer said the panel would complete its work and press for changes in the form of recommendations to Coast Guard leadership “to help ensure that nobody has to endure a future similar occurrence.”

He said his recommendations to the commandant will include safety proposals along with any criminal conduct. If the panel believes there was criminal conduct, then that recommendation would be handled through a separate process.

“My priority is to get this issue done expeditiously because I feel that there are global issues at stake,” Neubauer said.

Previous testimony painted contrasting images of greed and hubris with well-heeled clients paying to ride in a submersible made from carbon fiber — a material that was untested at such depths — versus modern-day explorers taking calculated risks to open the ocean's deepest depths to more people.