Tapestry and Capri Terminate $8.5B Merger Agreement

In This Article:

Updated at 5:09 p.m. EST

Tapestry Inc. and Capri Holdings are officially going their own way.

More from WWD

The two companies agreed to terminate their merger agreement, which has Tapestry now looking to push organic growth and buying back stock while Capri has entered into full turnaround mode.

John Idol, chairman and chief executive officer of Capri, was clear-eyed about how much work needs to be done on a conference call with analysts on Thursday, the company’s first touch base with Wall Street since the deal was signed in August 2023.

Idol acknowledged missteps at both Michael Kors and Versace and sketched out plans to revive the businesses, which will be expanded on with an in-depth strategy presentation to investors in February.

While the CEO stressed Capri has the resources to follow through on its strategies — “We have a very solid balance sheet and we still are generating significant free cash flow” — he also kept the door open to some additional dealmaking.

“If we do see any opportunity that would create additional shareholder value, we will certainly look at that very carefully,” Idol said.

Since the deal was paused with a preliminary injunction last month, analysts have openly speculated that Versace and Jimmy Choo could be sold while Michael Kors could be taken private.

Investors took heart and traded shares of Capri up 4.4 percent to $20.52 — a far cry from the $57 Tapestry agreed to pay for the company in what turns out to have been much better times.

Capri did get a kind of parting gift from the failed agreement. The company said in a regulatory filing that Tapestry agreed to reimburse it with approximately $45 million in cash.

Still, this is not the way things were supposed to go.

When Tapestry agreed to buy Capri at an enterprise value of $8.5 billion, it planned to use the turnaround plan that revitalized Coach and is still being applied at Kate Spade on the Michael Kors business.

But the prospect of having all those accessible luxury handbag brands under one roof drew the Federal Trade Commission, which sued to stop the buyout on antitrust grounds in April. Technically the deal was just paused pending a full trial, but that process would not wrap up before the Feb. 10 expiration of the merger contract.

The government argued — it turns out successfully — that once the deal closed, Tapestry would have enough clout in the market to unilaterally raise prices on accessible luxury handbags, hurting customers to the tune of $365 million annually.