Taking stock of bonds: Does the 60/40 rule still have a role in retirement savings?

The 60/40 rule is a fundamental tenet of investing. It says you should aim to keep 60% of your holdings in stocks, and 40% in bonds.

Stocks can yield robust returns, but they are volatile. Bonds provide modest but stable income, and they serve as a buffer when stock prices fall.

The 60/40 rule is one of the most familiar principles in personal finance. Yet, not long ago, much of the investment community walked away from it.

A chorus of essays and think pieces in 2023 and early 2024 asked if the 60/40 portfolio was dead, explained why it might no longer be good enough to sustain a balanced portfolio, and offered up investment alternatives.

The reason: 2022. Bonds suffered one of their all-time worst years, buffeted by a one-two punch of spiraling inflation and rising interest rates.

As 2024 draws to a close, however, investors are warming again to 60/40.

A trader wears a hat in support of Republican Donald Trump, after he won the U.S. presidential election, at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, Nov. 6, 2024.
A trader wears a hat in support of Republican Donald Trump, after he won the U.S. presidential election, at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, Nov. 6, 2024.

Should investors still follow the 60/40 rule?

In a recent report, the Vanguard investment firm reaffirmed 60/40 as “a great starting place for long-term investors, and that is as true today as any time in history.”

Other investment experts concur.

“Sixty-forty is still a good benchmark for a balanced portfolio,” said Jonathan Lee, senior portfolio manager at U.S. Bank.

And Todd Jablonski, global head of multi-asset investing for Principal Asset Management, considers the 60/40 rule “very much alive. I could make some Mark Twain jokes,” he said.

The 60/40 rule arises from common wisdom, which dictates that an investment portfolio should be balanced, especially as we approach retirement.

Stocks can deliver returns of about 10% a year, a much higher rate than an investor is likely to reap in an ordinary bank account. But the stock market is mercurial, and in a recession, it can nosedive.

Bonds are supposed to be safe, predictable, and boring: the perfect foil to stocks. When stocks go down, bonds go up, at least in theory.

Traders work, as screens display a news conference by Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell following the Fed rate announcement, on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, Jan. 31, 2024.
Traders work, as screens display a news conference by Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell following the Fed rate announcement, on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, Jan. 31, 2024.

'Boring' bonds went haywire in 2022

The events of 2022, however, seemed to turn the market on its ear. Stocks lost 18.6% of their value, as measured by the S&P 500. And bonds lost 13.7% of their value, according to the Vanguard Total Bond Market Index. After inflation, it was the worst bond return in 97 years, according to a NASDAQ analysis.

The bond bloodbath prompted some investors to question whether it was time to rewrite the rules of retirement saving, starting with the 60/40 rule.

Here’s why bonds tanked: In 2022, the Federal Reserve embarked on a dramatic campaign of interest-rate hikes in response to inflation, which reached a 40-year high.

That was bad for bonds. Bond funds tend to lose value when interest rates rise, and when inflation ticks up.