Stock Stories, Vol. 2: Third Time Was the Charm With This Stunning Business

In the common parlance of Wall Street, a "story stock" is one in which the numbers may not have arrived yet, but the narrative has -- and it's compelling enough to make investors buy essentially on spec. But from the perspective of Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner, every addition a Foolish investor makes to their portfolio has a story behind it, and on this week's episode of Rule Breaker Investing, he invites several of our analysts into the studio to share some of their favorites.

In this segment, one of The Fool's longest and most prolific veterans, Rick Munarriz, drops in to tell a tale of Tasers. The company behind the most popular stun gun took a sour turn not long after the Fool bought in back in 2004, and eventually, we decided it was time to break up. But like people, companies can change. They mature and grow -- as Taser did, into Axon Enterprise (NASDAQ: AAXN).

A full transcript follows the video.

More From The Motley Fool

This video was recorded on June 6, 2018.

David Gardner: What is the stock that you have for stock story No. 4?

Rick Munarriz: Once upon a time, there was a company called Taser Systems. Of course, we know it now as Axon Enterprise, a very successful, one of the hottest stocks in the Supernova universe over the past few months, and over the past year, really. We recommended it back in late 2004 in Rule Breakers. It was rerecced nine months later in the summer of 2005, after the stock has lost almost two-thirds of its value. This was a company, back then, all they were really making were Tasers. True to their name, they were the leading stun gun maker. And when we actually sold, we recommended that our readers and subscribers actually sell the stock back in February 2009, the stock was taking a beating. This was a company that, there was a lot of negative publicity. There were some deaths related to Tasers, and that led to both the negative publicity and some lawsuits. Revenue fell in 2008. It would also go on to decline in 2010. The company was not profitable at the time.

It was pretty much a very sad stock. You almost tell yourself, "OK, let's write this one off. Let's never revisit it. Let's never check into the story again." But as investors, we have to think beyond that.