Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $50,000 In Stable Road To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - August 11, 2021) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Stable Road Acquisition Corp. ("Stable Road" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: SRAC) and reminds investors of the September 13, 2021 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
If you suffered losses exceeding $50,000 investing in Stable Road stock or options between October 7, 2020 and July 13, 2021 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). You may also click here for additional information: www.faruqilaw.com/SRAC.
There is no cost or obligation to you.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading minority and Woman-owned national securities law firm with offices in New York, Delaware, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia.
As detailed below, the lawsuit focuses on whether the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) that Stable Road's target acquisition company, Momentus, had only conducted a single in-space test, which did not meet any of Momentus's pre-launch evaluation criteria, thus the company had not "successfully tested" its technology; (2) that the sole in-space test conducted by Momentus was never designed to test the commercial viability of the company's thrusters; (3) that, as a result, Momentus's progress in commercializing its technology was significantly overstated; (4) that Kokorich had been informed that the U.S. Government considered him to be a "threat" that caused his affiliation with another space technology company to be a risk to national security; (5) that, because Kokorich was considered a national security risk, Momentus would face challenges obtaining the necessary licenses and approvals for its commercial launches; (6) that, as a result, Kokorich's affiliation with Momentus jeopardized, among other things, the company's launch schedule and revenue projections which were based on assumptions about the timing of the company's first commercial launch; (7) that Stable Road had not conducted adequate due diligence, including as it relates to Momentus's testing progress and national security concerns with Momentus's CEO; (8) that, as a result of the failure to disclose the foregoing, Stable Road was reasonably likely to face regulatory scrutiny; and (9) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.