Smarter cities: How private markets are reshaping the urban landscape


In Plato's "Republic," Socrates and his interlocutors have a conversation that was apparently typical in ancient Greece. Is the soul immortal? Should we live a life focused on justice? What is the path to true happiness? Heady stuff that's been pondered for ages.

Socrates suggests exploring those issues on a larger scale, that of an entire city, to more easily uncover the answers. Since a lack of self-awareness is apparently timeless, he concludes that the philosophers should be king.

But the reasoning behind his method was sound: Cities, both large and small, are a window into the human condition. They reflect the hopes and challenges of entire civilizations. And they are a collective reflection of the values held by their people.

Right now, the urban cityscapes can tell us a lot. In PitchBook's headquarters of Seattle, a menagerie of rideshare bikes dot the streets. The homeless cluster in tents. Sandal-clad tech workers buzz around in Ubers. Cranes fill the sky. Thoroughfares are seemingly always jammed. And city leaders are struggling to address problems that have been decades in the making.

These observations are a microcosm of larger issues in play, such as densification and infrastructure deficits. Examples of how innovative technologies are being used to solve old problems with the limited resources at hand. A reminder of the rise of Asia and the languishing of the West. And with brands such as Lime and Lyft growing more ubiquitous, a reminder that private market companies and investors are playing pivotal roles, within their own particular areas, to collectively push cities toward a more efficient and sustainable future.

The stakes are high.

The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) gave the United States a "D+" in its most recent Infrastructure Report Card, warning, "Deteriorating infrastructure is impeding our ability to compete in the thriving global economy, and improvements are necessary to ensure our country is built for the future." In a 2016 economic study, the ASCE estimated that the dilapidated state of the nation's roads, bridges and other critical infrastructure will result in $3.9 trillion in losses to economic output, $7 trillion in lost business sales and 2.5 million lost jobs by 2025.

This infrastructure is concentrated in the urban cores, where airports, marine ports, public parks, wireless towers, petroleum pipelines, rail lines and power transmission assets are most densely distributed.

Much of that infrastructure was built in the middle of the 20th century when the nation's population was smaller and more widely dispersed. In 1960, there were roughly 181 million US residents, according to Census Bureau data, versus 309 million in 2010. Then, around 70% of the population lived in urban cores. By 2010, almost 81% did.

On a global scale, the United Nations estimates that the world population will swell: from 7.6 billion souls last year to 8.6 billion in 2030, 9.8 billion in 2050 and 11.2 billion in 2100. In a separate study, the UN estimated that while 55% of the world's population lives in urban areas now, that proportion will increase to 68% by 2050. World urbanization
If you think your nearest city is bustling now, just wait.

According to Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BofAML), the United States alone faces an estimated $3.8 trillion infrastructure gap by 2040. They estimate that the current public infrastructure market is worth between $3 trillion and $4 trillion today and could double to $8 trillion by 2030. Globally, the infrastructure gap is estimated to total $18 trillion on a total investment of $79 trillion.

With those types of sums in play, capital is being increasingly drawn to an area where financing was typically borne by taxpayers via elected officials and not private enterprise. But that could be set to change.