Silver Tiger Announces Filing of Updated Mineral Resource Estimate and Pre-Feasibility Study Technical Report for the El Tigre Silver-Gold Project
ACCESS Newswire · Silver Tiger Metals Inc.

In This Article:

HALIFAX, NS / ACCESSWIRE / December 6, 2024 / Silver Tiger Metals Inc. (TSXV:SLVR)(OTCQX:SLVTF) ("Silver Tiger" or the "Corporation") is pleased to announce the filing of a Preliminary Feasibility Study ("PFS") for its 100% owned, silver-gold El Tigre Project (the "Project" or "El Tigre") located in Sonora, Mexico. The Technical Report supports the scientific and technical disclosure in the Company's news release dated October 22, 2024, announcing the results of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate and Pre-Feasibility Study. The Technical Report is available at www.sedarplus.ca under the Company's profile.

The updated MRE also contains an Out-of-Pit Mineral Resource that Silver Tiger plans to study in a Preliminary Economic Assessment in H1-2025.

Highlights of the PFS are as follows (all figures in US dollars unless otherwise stated):

  • After-Tax net present value ("NPV") (using a discount rate of 5%) of US$222 million with an After-Tax IRR of 40.0% and Payback Period of 2.0 years (Base Case);

  • 10-year mine life recovering a total of 43 million payable silver equivalent ounces ("AgEq") or 510 thousand payable gold equivalent ounces ("AuEq"), consisting of 9 million silver ounces and 408 thousand gold ounces;

  • Total Project undiscounted after-tax cash flow of US$318 million;

  • Initial capital costs of $86.8 million, which includes $9.3 million of contingency costs, over an expected 18-month build, expansion capital of $20.1 million in year 3 and sustaining capital costs of $6.2 million over the life of mine ("LOM");

  • Average LOM operating cash costs of $973/oz AuEq, and all in sustaining costs ("AISC") of $1,214/oz AuEq or Average LOM operating cash costs of $12/oz AgEq, and all in sustaining costs ("AISC") of $14/oz AgEq;

  • Average annual production of approximately 4.8 million AgEq oz or 56.7 thousand AuEq oz; and

  • Three (3) years of production in the Proven category in the Phase 1 Starter Pit.

Preliminary Feasibility Summary

The PFS was prepared by independent consultants P&E Mining Consultants Inc. ("P&E"), with metallurgical test work completed by McClelland Laboratories, Inc. - Sparks, Nevada, process plant design and costing by D.E.N.M. Engineering Ltd., environmental and permitting led by CIMA Mexico, and geotechnical assessment of heap leach design, waste dump design and pit slopes by WSP Global Inc. Table 1 shows key assumptions and results.

Table 1: El Tigre PFS Key Economic Assumptions and Results(1-2)

Assumption / Result

Unit

Value

Assumption / Result

Unit

Value

Total OP Plant Feed Mined

kt

40,292

Net Revenue

US$M

1,093

Operating Strip Ratio

Ratio

1.7:1

Initial Capital Costs

US$M

86.8

Silver Grade1

g/t

14.9

Expansion Capital Costs

US$M

20.1

Gold Grade1

g/t

0.40

Sustaining Capital Costs

US$M

6.2

Silver Recovery (Oxide/Sul.)2

%

45 / 40

Mining Costs

$/t Material

2.24

Gold Recovery (Oxide/Sul.)2

%

83 / 56

Processing Costs (Phase 1 and Phase 2)

$/t Feed

5.79/4.74

Silver Price

US$/oz

26.00

G&A Costs

$/t Feed

1.27

Gold Price

US$/oz

2,150

Operating Cash Cost

US$/oz AgEq

11.6

Payable Silver Metal

Moz

8.57

All-in Sustaining Cost

US$/oz AgEq

14.4

Payable Gold Metal

koz

408

After-Tax NPV (5% discount)

US$M

222

Payable AgEq

Moz

42.9

Pre-Tax NPV (5% discount)

US$M

342

Mine Life

Yrs

10

After-Tax IRR

%

40.0

Average mining rate

t/day

30,000

Pre-Tax IRR

%

51.2

After-Tax Payback Period

Yrs

2.0

  1. Grades shown are LOM average process plant feed grades include only OP sources. Mining losses and external dilution of 3.7% were incorporated in the mining schedule.

  2. Column testing indicated both variable gold and silver recovery for the oxide material vs the previously reported non-discounted PEA (83% and 64%) at a 3/8-in crush size. In the process design and financial model for the PFS process design and financial model recoveries have been discounted by 3% for leaching in the field versus optimum conditions in the laboratory and shown accordingly. The presence of transition and sulfide zones has affected both the gold and silver recoveries and are shown as separate recoveries. These are reasonable and appropriate for use in this PFS design and economic analysis.