SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in Eros International plc of Class Action Lawsuit and Upcoming Deadline - EROS

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / June 30, 2019 / Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Eros International plc ("Eros" or the "Company") (EROS) and certain of its officers. The class action, filed in United States District Court, for or the District of New Jersery, and indexed under 19-cv-14445, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded Eros securities from July 28, 2017 through June 5, 2019, inclusive (the "Class Period"). Plaintiff seeks to recover compensable damages caused by Defendants' violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").

If you are a shareholder who purchased Eros securities during the class period, you have until August 20, 2019, to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class. A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at www.pomerantzlaw.com. To discuss this action, contact Robert S. Willoughby atrswilloughby@pomlaw.com or 888.476.6529 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll-free, Ext. 9980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and the number of shares purchased.

[Click here forinformation about joining the class action]

Eros, together with its subsidiaries, including its majority-owned subsidiary Eros International Media Limited ("EIML"), co-produces, acquires, and distributes Indian films in various formats worldwide. The Company distributes its film content through various distribution channels, including theaters, television syndication, internet channels, and physical formats comprising DVDs and video compact discs (VCDs). Further, it operates as a music publisher for third party owned music rights. Eros has rights for approximately 3,000 films in its library.

The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operational and compliance policies. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Eros's Indian subsidiary, EIML, was experiencing ongoing delays and default in debt servicing due to slowdown in collection from debtors; (ii) because of this, Eros's financial position was weaker than what the Company disclosed; (iii) the foregoing conduct foreseeably would result in a credit downgrade for the Company's subsidiary; and (iv) as a result, Eros's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.