In This Article:
NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 29, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
Plantronics, Inc. (PLT)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/plantronics-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=5083&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 13, 2020
Class Period: July 2, 2018 to November 5, 2019
Allegations against PLT include that: (1) the Company had engaged in channel stuffing to artificially boost sales; (2) the Company's internal control over inventory levels was not effective; (3) the Company had not adequately monitored inventory levels ahead of multiple product launches, where the new models would displace demand for aging products; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (AFI)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/armstrong-flooring-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=5083&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 14, 2020
Class Period: March 6, 2018 to November 4, 2019
Allegations against AFI include that: (1) the Company had engaged in channel stuffing to artificially boost sales; (2) the Company's internal control over inventory levels was not effective; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. (FCAU)
If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/fiat-chrysler-automobiles-n-v-loss-submission-form?prid=5083&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 31, 2020
Class Period: February 26, 2016 to November 20, 2019
Allegations against FCAU include that: (1) the Company employed a bribery scheme to obtain favorable terms in its collective bargaining agreement with United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America; (2) high-ranking Fiat officials were aware of and authorized the scheme; and (3) as a result, Defendants' statements about Fiat's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and/or misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email vw@wongesq.com or by telephone at 212.425.1140.