SHAREHOLDER ALERT: GTT CAH IFF: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Reminds Investors of Important Class Action Deadlines

In This Article:

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / September 29, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.

GTT Communications, Inc. (GTT)

If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/gtt-communications-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=3750&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 30, 2019
Class Period: February 26, 2018 to July 1, 2019

Allegations against GTT include that: (1) following GTT's acquisition of Interoute Communications Holdings S.A., there were delays in migrating Interoute's legacy systems and processes into GTT's client management database system; (2) Interoute had made a strategic priority shift to sell cloud services that was a higher percentage of Interoute's sales in the two years leading up to the acquisition; (3) a material percentage of the Interoute sales representatives were not productive at selling GTT's core cloud networking services; (4) GTT was unable to yield as many Interoute salespeople because Interoute had hired many sales people focused on cloud services and allowed underperforming sales representatives to remain at Interoute; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' public statements were materially false and/or misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH)

If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/cardinal-health-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=3750&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 30, 2019
Class Period: March 2, 2015 to May 2, 2018

Allegations against CAH include that: 1) following Cardinal's acquisition of Cordis, the RFID [radio-frequency identification] inventory tracking technology and advanced supply chain solutions that Defendants told investors the Company would to use to improve Cordis's performance were never implemented across Cordis; 2) Cordis's antiquated and ineffective global supply chain was causing operational and inventory problems at Cordis; 3) as a result, Cordis manufactured and accumulated excessive amounts of cardiovascular product inventories, which sat on the shelf and became unsellable and/or expired; 4) the Company materially overstated Cordis's inventory balances; 5) Cordis was not "performing well" and its integration was not "on track," "going incredibly well" or "largely on plan"; and 6) to correct Cordis's deficiencies, the Company would have to make substantial investments in Cordis's IT and supporting infrastructure, thereby incurring significant Selling, General and Administrative Expenses charges beyond the levels internally budgeted or projected by Cardinal and diminishing operating earnings.