Ripple CEO: 3 reasons XRP token is not a security

In This Article:

One week ago, SEC official Bill Hinman declared on stage at Yahoo Finance’s All Markets Summit: Crypto that the SEC does not view bitcoin or ether as securities, and thus will leave them alone in terms of SEC regulation.

Hinman did not mention XRP, the No. 3 cryptocurrency by market cap.

Now Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse is making his case for why XRP should get the same treatment as bitcoin and ether. Speaking on Thursday at the CB Insights Future of Fintech conference in New York City, live-streamed by Yahoo Finance, Garlinghouse presented “three key arguments” for why XRP is not a security.

As a quick refresher: Ripple is a private software company that sells products to banks and remittance firms that help them send and settle cross-border payments faster. XRP is a digital token that Ripple, the company, uses in one of its products for banks, xRapid, but does not use in its most popular product, xCurrent. Ripple and XRP are separate things, but they are constantly confused and conflated by cryptocurrency speculators and by the media—it doesn’t help matters that Ripple owns 60% of the supply of XRP tokens.

Here are Garlinghouse’s three arguments.

1. “If Ripple the company shut down tomorrow, the XRP ledger would continue to operate. It’s open-source, decentralized technology that exists independent of Ripple.”

2. “The people buying XRP, they don’t think they’re buying shares of Ripple. There’s a company called Ripple, we are a private company, we have investors… but buying XRP doesn’t give you ownership of Ripple, it doesn’t give you access to dividends or profits that come from Ripple.”

3. “XRP is solving a problem. There’s no utility in a security.”

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse at the Yahoo Finance All Markets Summit: Crypto on Feb. 7, 2018 in New York. (Gino DePinto/Oath)
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse at the Yahoo Finance All Markets Summit: Crypto on Feb. 7, 2018 in New York. (Gino DePinto/Oath)

To be sure, Garlinghouse’s arguments have to come with a heavy grain of salt. He’s making the case for XRP not being a security because Ripple doesn’t want the SEC interfering with XRP. (By the way, if the SEC were to come out and say XRP is not a security, the price of XRP would shoot up.) Cory Johnson, Ripple’s chief market strategist, made the same argument about XRP at Yahoo Finance’s crypto summit last week.

When Garlinghouse says XRP is a utility, he means that it’s used for an actual business purpose, unlike a stock certificate. Ripple utilizes XRP as a vehicle for sending funds internationally. But he ought to go back and look at what the SEC specifically warned in December: “Merely calling a token a ‘utility’ token or structuring it to provide some utility does not prevent the token from being a security.”

Most importantly, many crypto enthusiasts insist that because Ripple owns more than half the supply of XRP, the token is not truly decentralized.