Reeves ‘on verge of breaking her own fiscal rules’ as borrowing costs surge

In This Article:

Rachel Reeves faces long-term borrowing costs that have risen to their highest level since 1998
Rachel Reeves faces long-term borrowing costs that have risen to their highest level since 1998 - John Thys/AFP via Getty Images

Rachel Reeves is on the brink of breaking her fiscal rules and being forced into another tax raid, economists have warned as borrowing costs surged to the highest level since 1998.

The Chancellor has a cushion of just £1bn left before she faces a “nasty choice” between more tax rises, spending cuts, and breaking her main fiscal rule to balance the books by the end of this parliament, according to Capital Economics.

In research published on Tuesday afternoon, it said that the jump in borrowing costs had wiped out £8.9bn of the Chancellor’s £9.9bn headroom to meet her fiscal rule of a balanced budget by 2029/30.

Economists Ruth Gregory and Alex Kerr said: “There is a significant chance that the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) will judge that the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is on course to miss her main fiscal rule when it revises its forecasts on March 26.

“To maintain fiscal credibility, this may mean that Reeves is forced to tighten fiscal policy further.”

They added: “In recent years, the fiscal headroom has never been this low. It would only take a further 0.06 percentage point increase in market interest rate expectations and 20-year gilt yields to wipe it out altogether.”

Capital Economics said that this is before the OBR factors in the recent weakness in economic activity.

It said: “Reeves will be in trouble if the OBR decides that some of the weak GDP growth in Q3 and Q4 of last year reflects a permanent, rather than a temporary, loss of output”, the economists said. It would take just a 0.1pc downward revision to the OBR’s forecast in 2029/30 to wipe out that £1.0bn of headroom.

“This means Reeves could soon face a nasty choice of breaking her fiscal rules or announcing more tax rises and/or spending restraint at a time when the economy is already weak.

“We suspect she would choose the latter, perhaps by reducing spending relative to existing plans in 2028/29 and 2029/30. That way, she could avoid worsening the economy’s near-term prospects and avoid politically unpalatable tax rises. And she may hope that by the time the spending squeeze arrived, things had improved such that she would not actually have to implement it.”

The economists’ warning came as the the yield on 30-year UK bonds - the return the Government promises to buyers of its debt - rose to 5.22pc today for the first time in more than a quarter of a century.

A Treasury spokesman said: “We are not going to pre-empt the OBR’s forecast; however, no one should be under any doubt of the Chancellor’s commitment to economic stability and sound public finances. That is why meeting the fiscal rules is non-negotiable.