Yahoo Finance

Jenny Osterhout

Thanks, Doug, and good morning, everyone. Let me begin by focusing on the quarter, then briefly recap our year and conclude with what we expect for 2025. Our fourth quarter was highlighted by the continuation of improved credit trends, growth in high-quality originations and solid revenue growth. We also completed the year with continued strong execution in the funding markets. Fourth quarter GAAP net income was $126 million or $1.05 per diluted share, down from $1.38 per diluted share in the fourth quarter of 2023. C&I adjusted net income was $1.16 per diluted share, down from $1.39 in the fourth quarter of 2023.
Capital generation, the metric against which we manage and measure our business totaled $183 million, which compares to $191 million in the fourth quarter of 2023, primarily reflecting the impact of the current macroeconomic environment on our net charge-offs, partially offset by higher interest income from portfolio growth. Managed receivables finished the year at $24.7 billion, up $2.5 billion or 11% from a year ago. Fourth quarter originations were $3.5 billion, led by strong organic growth of 11% year-over-year. The acquisition of Foursight in April contributed another 5% to the total year-over-year increase of 16%. The strong growth is a result of the constructive competitive environment, along with our focused efforts to drive originations within our continued conservative underwriting posture.
The APR on our consumer loan originations was 27.0% this quarter, up 16 basis points from the third quarter, continuing the trend we have seen for several quarters. These origination levels will support yield as the book matures and older originations roll off. Fourth quarter consumer loan yield was 22.2% up 14 basis points compared to the prior quarter, benefiting from pricing actions we've taken, partially offset by the continued growth in our lower loss, lower yield OneMain auto business.
As we look ahead to 2025, we expect flat to modest improvement in consumer loan yields from these levels, largely dependent on our product mix throughout the year. Total revenue was $1.5 billion, up 9% compared to fourth quarter of 2023. Interest income of $1.3 billion grew 11% year-over-year, driven by receivables growth. Other revenue of $177 million was down 4% from prior year. Interest expense for the quarter was $310 million, up $39 million versus prior year, driven by an increase in average debt to support our receivables growth and modestly higher cost of funds compared to a year ago.
Interest expense as a percent of average net receivables in the quarter was 5.3%. As we look forward, we expect this to increase slightly. If there is volatility in interest rates in 2025, our balance sheet strategy to issue largely fixed rate longer-dated securities minimizes the impact. Fourth quarter provision expense was $523 million, comprising net charge-offs of $464 million and a $59 million increase to our allowance driven by the increase in receivables during the quarter. I'll discuss losses in more detail momentarily. Policyholder benefits and claims expense for the quarter was $49 million, flat to prior year, and we expect quarterly PBMC expense in the low $50 million range in 2025.
Let's turn to slide 9 and look at consumer loan delinquency trends. Our 30- to 89-day delinquency at December 31, excluding our Foursight acquisition was 3.06% down 22 basis points year-over-year, which is notably better than the trend we saw a year ago and the trends we saw in the pre-pandemic period, as shown on slide 10. 30-plus delinquencies were down more than 50 basis points compared to a year ago as 90-plus delinquencies also notably improved. This quarter marks the first year-over-year improvement on delinquency in recent years. We are actively managing credit and see these trends as encouraging signs for continued positive momentum in lower loss levels and higher earnings in 2025 and beyond.
On slide 10, you can also see our front book vintages now comprise 84% of total receivables. The performance of the front book remains in line with expectations and is the primary driver of the improved credit trends in our portfolio. And while the back book makes up just 16% of the total portfolio, it still represents about one-third of our 30-plus delinquency. As the back book continues transitioning and we see the front book grow as a percentage of our portfolio, we expect our delinquency and loss metrics to continue to improve. And it is worth noting that there remains some headwind in our credit metrics from our decisions to tighten credit, slowing originations, which has extended the average age of our portfolio.
Let's now turn to charge-offs and reserves as shown on slide 11. C&I net charge-offs, which includes credit cards for 7.9% of average net receivables in the fourth quarter, up 36 basis points from the third quarter, which is well below the approximate 100 basis point increases we've seen in the last two years and below the approximate 50 basis point increases we saw on average in pre-pandemic years. We are also seeing the trends improve in our year-over-year comparisons. These are all encouraging signs of improved loss performance in the quarters ahead.
Also, it is helpful to point out that while still relatively small, the credit card portfolio is growing modestly, and we are seeing an impact in our C&I net charge-offs from the higher loss card business, which carries higher overall revenue and generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. Consumer loan net charge-offs, which exclude credit card were 7.6% in the quarter, down 7 basis points year-over-year. This clearly demonstrates the improvement we have been seeing in early delinquencies and the go-forward trajectory of losses as we move away from peak losses in the first half of 2024.
Recoveries remained steady and strong in the quarter at $77 million or 1.3% of receivables, well above our pre-pandemic levels. Loan loss reserves ended the quarter at $2.7 billion. Our reserves increased by $59 million in the quarter, driven by portfolio growth in consumer loans and credit card receivables, while our reserve coverage remained steady at 11.5%. Once again, it's worth mentioning here that our reserves include the impact of our credit card portfolio, which, as I mentioned, is higher loss and therefore, carries a higher loss reserve.
And while we are seeing positive trends in our credit metrics, we haven't made changes in the macroeconomic assumptions in our reserve calculation, given the continued uncertainty around inflation and unemployment. So I expect in the near term, to see our reserve coverage remain around current levels. We will continue to assess reserve levels and expect that when the uncertainty around the macro subside and as we see sustained improvement in the credit performance of our portfolio, our coverage level will come down in time.
Now let's turn to slide 12. Operating expenses were $422 million, up 10% compared to a year ago driven by the Foursight acquisition and investment in our business. The full year 2024 OpEx ratio of 6.6% was abnormally low, resulting from the savings generated by the expense actions we took in the first quarter. As we had said, we expected to reinvest a portion of the savings in the business to drive growth and efficiencies in the future, and you can see that reinvestment in the latter part of the year. Stepping back, our business model continues to have inherent operating leverage, and you can see that as our OpEx ratio has steadily improved since 2019.
Now let's turn to funding and our balance sheet on slide 13. During the quarter, we issued a $900 million 4.5-year unsecured bond at 6.625%. The offering attracted a strong set of both new and returning investors and resulted in the narrower spreads we've ever seen on an unsecured issuance. Since June of 2023, we've issued six unsecured bonds totaling $4 billion and with each issuance, we have seen gradual improvements in pricing and healthy demand for our bonds. Also, you may have seen, we've already begun our funding for 2025 earlier this month with a five-year revolving $900 million auto ABS issuance with an average cost of funds just under 5.5%.
Once again, demand for our secured paper was extremely strong. We are feeling very good about where we stand with our best-in-class funding strategy and our ability to execute. We're also pleased to have expanded our forward flow coal loan sale program to $900 million annually through the end of 2025. As we've said before, we regularly evaluate the benefits of committed flow arrangements for their near- and long-term effects to our business and are pleased with the economics of the program we have in place. We see these types of arrangements as useful tools to further diversify our funding options.
During the quarter, we also optimized our bank lines to $7.4 billion. And as part of that, we converted a $375 million secured bank line to private placement. So we feel really good about our liquidity position and our runway. Net leverage at the end of the fourth quarter was 5.6x, flat to prior quarter. We've adjusted the calculation to remove quarterly volatility from the impact of changes in AOCI in our adjusted capital, aligning with common market practices and how the ratings agencies measure tangible equity.
Before I discuss 2025 strategic initiatives, let me briefly recap our full year 2024 performance against the expectations we laid out at the beginning of the year. First, we expected to grow our managed receivables to approximately $24 billion, inclusive of our auto finance acquisition, and we ended the year at $24.7 billion, benefiting from the strong competitive environment and the growth initiatives we successfully implemented starting in June of last year. We expected total revenue growth in the range of 6% to 8%, and we came in at the top end of our range at 7.6%.
We expected interest expense as a percentage of average net receivables to come in at approximately 5.2%, and we came in at 5.26%, even as we held more excess cash on our balance sheet through much of the year, and took the opportunity to raise incremental debt to manage near-term maturities and support our liquidity runway. We expected C&I net charge-offs in the range of 7.7% to 8.3% while calling peak losses in the first half of 2024. We came in within the range at 8.1% for the year, with peak losses occurring in the first quarter of 2024.
Finally, we expected our operating expense ratio to come down to approximately 6.7% from 7.0% in 2023. We came in at 6.6% for the full year. Even in a challenging year where we saw peak losses resulting from a negative credit cycle, we generated capital of $685 million and a return on receivables of 3.1%, demonstrating the strength of our business model. As credit improves and we continue to grow, we expect to see capital generation growth and improved returns, positioning the business for continued success in the years ahead.
Now let's discuss our expectations for certain key metrics in 2025. Turning to slide 15. We expect to continue growing managed receivables and revenues even as we remain cautious on the economy and maintain a tight credit posture. And as always, we are fully prepared to accelerate growth if and when conditions improve. We expect managed receivables to grow approximately 5% to 8%, reflecting solid loan originations. We expect revenue growth in the range of 6% to 8% following our expected receivables growth I just mentioned, along with modest improvement in consumer loan yield.
In terms of our guide for credit, we expect full year C&I net charge-offs in the range of 7.5% to 8.0% as we reap the benefits of the actions we took to actively manage credit over the past couple of years. We expect to see typical seasonal patterns once again in our quarterly losses with first half 2025 net charge-offs above the full year range and second half below. Our guide assumes no change in the macroeconomic environment, including inflation. I also think it's helpful to point out that you can see in our fourth quarter results that consumer loan net charge-offs are improving and running about 25 basis points below C&I net charge-offs as we mature the card business, and as consumer loans continue to improve, we expect that relationship will widen to approximately 40 basis points in 2025.
On operating expenses, there will be some minor variability throughout the year with a full year OpEx ratio of approximately 6.6%, in line with last year's OpEx ratio and notably better than our OpEx ratio in 2023. In summary, as we look ahead to 2025 and beyond, we see strong momentum in our business and believe we're well positioned to excel in any economic environment. To that end, we remain confident in our ability to achieve the medium-term capital generation and growth targets that we discussed during our 2023 Investor Day.
And with that, let me turn the call back over to Doug.

Douglas Shulman

Thanks, Jenny. I'm pleased with the results for the quarter and for the full year, and especially pleased with the progress we continue to make to enhance our competitive position. Just five years ago, we are a monoline provider of personal loans offered through our branch network. Today, we offer personal loans through multiple channels, including our branches and have added credit cards for customers' everyday transactions and auto loans at the point of purchase. This has expanded our addressable market 10x.
And as we expand our business, we are bringing to bear our deep understanding of the nonprime consumer and our over 100-year history of best-in-class credit and balance sheet management. We have a lot of momentum going into 2025 and are excited to bring even more value to an ever-growing set of customers. I'll close by offering my thanks to all of the OneMain team members for their dedication and hard work throughout 2024 and their continued commitment to our customers every day.
With that, let me open it up to questions.

Question and Answer Session

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Terry Ma, Barclays.

Terry Ma

Maybe just to start off with credit, your delinquency trends inflected negative by quite a large margin this quarter down 22 basis points. Can you just speak to your confidence of just whether or not you can kind of sustain that performance going forward? And then just on your guide for the year, the 7.5% to 8% charge-offs. I guess maybe just talk about what gets to the high end versus the low end? Because obviously, the high end is not that much improvement, whereas the low end is more meaningful.

Jenny Osterhout

Thanks, Terry. It's Jenny. So let me start with your first question on sort of the credit trends. So generally, we're really pleased with the continued improvement we've seen across early delinquency and late-stage delinquency. We're confident we've come down from those peak losses in the first quarter of 2024, and we're we look forward to lower losses driving improved earnings and cap gen.
When we look at our delinquency trends this quarter, we really see them all pointing in the right direction, so that 3.06% Consumer loan delinquency is better than our historical patterns, and we saw it was -- you mentioned 22 basis points better than last year and only 5 basis points higher than the third quarter, which is very good seasonally. And for losses, our consumer loan net charge-offs are down 7 basis points year-over-year. So we've crossed over 2023 and are improving. And we focus on delinquency because that's the best leading indicator for losses. So from where we say right now, we really feel like we've seen the impact of our underwriting changes that we made since August 2022, and we're expecting that momentum to come through in 2025.
And to hit on your second piece, the go forward and the guide and what it would take to put us sort of at the top end of that range or at the bottom end, I mean it really is dependent on the pace of the back book rolling off, those continued delinquency trends and the roll rates through to loss. Our growth in originations also impacts delinquencies. So to the extent that we can continue to grow. And then there's the macro obviously. And to the extent it gets better, it could push you towards the top end or to the extent it gets much worse, it could push you much further. So I think those are sort of -- I think that's the best way to guide you.

Terry Ma

Got it. That's helpful. And then maybe as a follow-up on the portfolio yield. I think you guided to kind of modest improvement in 2025. But as I look at the yield in the back half of this past year, it improved cumulatively about 30 basis points over the last two quarters. So any color around that and the dynamics going forward?

Jenny Osterhout

Yes. Yes. No problem. Thanks. So you're right, I said before, we're expecting very modest improvement from our fourth quarter run rate, which was 22.2% on consumer loan yield for next year -- or for this year, I should say. We are already seeing the improvements from the pricing actions that we've taken in the personal loan portfolio and the auto portfolio over the past several quarters, and that's starting to flow through.
But as you know, those tailwinds are partially offset by credit. And there's also the growth in our lower loss, lower yield auto business and it takes time. So looking forward, that rate of improvement really will depend on our product mix, meaning auto, which types of personal loans were lending, the state rate mix, et cetera.

Operator

Moshe Orenbuch, TD Cowen.

Moshe Orenbuch

Maybe kind of sticking with credit a little bit, Jenny. I mean, you talked -- you mentioned kind of roll rates as a as a factor that's going to drive charge-offs relative to delinquencies. Could you just talk a little bit, I mean given obviously, we've got this persistent inflationary environment, but at least in theory that continues to get better or less bad as time goes on. And maybe are there other factors that we should be looking at?

Jenny Osterhout

No, thanks for that. I think that's right. It's a key -- it's one of the key metrics that we're looking at. We do see roles from delinquency to charge-off performing pretty well. There is a little bit of noise from some of our new products but if you look at the rules from 30 to 89 for consumer loans, excluding Foursight to charge off, those trends are in line to slightly better than what we would typically see. So that's a good sign, and we're watching it closely. And to the extent it continues, it would be a great sign for credit.

Douglas Shulman

Let me just add, Moshe, a little bit on credit is a lot of the improvement we're seeing is us actively managing the book, which means we've got a very high-touch personalized business model where we can work with any customer who might be getting into trouble, and we think we get priority of payment.
And also, we've been originating better credit customers who have plenty of net disposable income to pay us back. And so what we've seen since really '22, credit was pretty volatile. And we didn't see what we had originated in '21, performing in line with expectations. We've really seen things stabilize, which means the credit performance of the loans we were booking all last year are performing as expected. But I think the important thing is, as you mentioned, I mean, cumulative inflation is still high. A customer still goes to the grocery store and pays $140 for their groceries when they used to pay $100 five years ago, and that's in their mind. The good news is income is caught up in aggregate.
And so in general, people kind of curious about high and low end of the range. If we see vintages of customers, monthly vintages, quarterly vintages, start performing better than expected, that's what we'll start to drive things down and get you to lower end of the range. And so we're really happy that we've been able to manage our business to get the portfolio average of credit dropping this year, and we think it will drop again next year. And we've seen things really stabilized, and we've been spot on with our assumptions as we underwrite. And so -- but the consumer -- it's not like the broad consumer has gotten wildly better in the last year. It's more we've gotten better consumers on our book.

Moshe Orenbuch

Got it. And I guess as a follow-up, the kind of outlook that you put out there kind of has revenue and expenses growing at the same rate. And yes, I understand that your efficiency is better than it was pre-pandemic. But is there either something in there that you're thinking of a specific investment for a multiyear period or if we get kind of to the higher end of the range on revenue growth, would we then see that operating leverage even '25?

Jenny Osterhout

Thanks. I think there is some room in there, wait and see how growth originations growth plays out. So I think there is some room to swing in there. But revenue growth broadly follows the growth in the portfolio and receivables. And there is some yield improvement in our revenues and a bit of fee revenue from the card book. And so the short answer is, I think there's some room for that.

Operator

Mark DeVries, Deutsche Bank.

Mark DeVries

Yes. Thanks for the comments you provided already, Jenny, on kind of allowance coverage, but I was hoping to drill down a little bit more. Just wanted to better understand where you think that kind of ultimately goes to a CECL day 1 still relevant? Or is kind of the mix shift with adding in both auto at lower losses and card, a presumably higher kind of affecting the ultimate endpoint? Is it also kind of affecting the kind of the near intermediate term dynamics on where that goes, just kind of the relative growth in your different loan types?

Jenny Osterhout

Thanks. It's a good question. So there's obviously a lot that goes into how we look at the CECL reserve. And so I'm going to break it down into its parts a little bit and then we can come back to sort of how to think about the go forward. We said before, we're confident in our delinquency and our loss metrics improving. And our reserves look at lifetime losses. And as those continue to improve in the portfolio, we should see shifts on our consumer loan reserves, and those should come in gradually.
There is the macro overlay, which reflects the uncertainty in the future direction of really say, inflation, unemployment and interest rates. And given there is a little uncertainty, we're just not ready to assume that things get better. So I think to the extent things get better, there's some potential there. And then you're right, there is some product mix. We have a growing but pretty immature card portfolio. So as that portfolio grows and we really figure out where it steadies out to, I think that's another piece of this.
And so today, we're at that 11.5%. And over time, we could see that overall reserve coming down. I would say about 50 basis points. I wouldn't expect it to get back to day 1. But it's really dependent on the market environment and that product mix and the timing of the two.

Mark DeVries

Okay. Just to follow-up on the CECL reserves on card. I mean it looks like charge-offs were more than twice what they are for the average billing, but I'm assuming the average life is shorter. Is there -- I'm just trying to get a sense of the what we should model for kind of like a CECL day 1 reserve on a card balance versus the rest of kind of your consumer loan.

Jenny Osterhout

Yes. When we look at it, we see consumer loans is closer to about 11.2% if you didn't have card. And then if you added in card, you'd obviously get closer to the reserve levels that we have today.

Operator

John Hecht, Jefferies.

John Hecht

Doug and Jenny. First question is, I know it's early, and I know you've given some color on this, but it's early to evaluate '24. But are there measures you can look at or characteristics you can look at maybe like first payment defaults or something like that, that you can kind of give us an initial take about what vintage '24 might be comparable to relative to history?

Jenny Osterhout

We don't typically give vintage level information, but I can -- I think across, I'd say, so across all of our front book, I'd say we are seeing really good customer payment behavior. And we continue to see early payoffs trend around you or a little bit below pre-pandemic levels. We are seeing [30 and 3] tracking closer to 2017. So I think we're quite happy with the more recent vintages.

John Hecht

Okay. And then given the forward curve, I guess, market conditions, which are pretty strong right now, and then your debt maturity stack, how should we think about cost of capital? Like, assuming all of those stay kind of where they are now, what would happen to the cost of capital over the course of the year?

Jenny Osterhout

Thanks. That's a great question. Really, we expect this year to be slightly above where we are which we think is still pretty attractive given we've risen not as much as the cumulative impact from the rise of rates over the last several years. So we've been able to mute the rise quite a bit. But this year is pretty locked in. Nearly 90% of our average for 2025 is already on our books at fixed rates today. So in the near term, I think that's the best reasonable guide because we're relatively insulated from changes in rates in year.

Operator

Kyle Joseph, Stephens.

Kyle Joseph

Just wanted to get a competitive update kind of by product channel, just weighing the supply and demand of credit across card, personal loans and auto.

Douglas Shulman

Yes. I mean, let me give you a broad and then I can break it down a little. I mean, personal loans is still by far, the largest part of our book, the largest part of our originations. I think it's been a very constructive competitive environment for us, as you see from our double-digit overall originations growth.
We've been able to have about two-thirds of what we're originating consistently all the way through 2024 being our top 2 risk grades and we've been able to get some price improvement along the way. So that tells us that we still have a very good competitive position and that there's probably not as much supply for our customers with our value proposition at the price that we offer.
With that said, one of the main drivers of competitive environment is people's access to capital. We've got this differentiated balance sheet. As Jenny said, we already have 90% of our funding on book. We've been able through this whole down cycle the last several years of consumer credit in the nonprime space to make every single loan we want. Some of our competitors had real trouble raising funds a couple of years ago, I think there is more supply of funds and people who want to wind can get funds now. And there is capital available in the market for solid players.
Generally, our spreads have been tighter than our competitors. So it still gives us some competitive advantage. I think some of the newer tech players are -- you've seen kind of come in and out of the market some. And so it -- I think we're going to assume that there's going to be a lot of competition this year if the macro remains stable. I think in cards, remember, we have a very small book, and there's a lot of different players. We're just a real upstart. So we have -- we find channels and pockets where we have super high conviction. So it's not like we're competing broadly in the card market right now. I mean last quarter, we originated 93 million of cards.
I think that market, similar commentary of what I gave you. The really big players and some of the banks have plenty of access to capital. Some of the smaller players have run into trouble. Some of them have sold off recently. And then a similar commentary in auto. With our independent dealers, we've got a unique market position, and we are a super strong player with the independent dealers, and we see that market, we haven't seen a lot of competitive pressure.
And then in the franchise dealers, which we've just gone into, similar comment to what I said about cards is we're such a challenger and so small. We're picking pockets Foursight has deep and long relationships with dealers. And so we're leveraging that and will slowly expand. And so I think, overall, it's a more competitive environment than it was a couple of years ago. But I don't think we're back to the same kind of -- some irrational competition that we saw in '21.

Kyle Joseph

Got it. Very helpful. And then just a quick follow-up, given where we are in the year in the quarter. Just anything you'd highlight on tax refund expectations or what you've seen so far this year and kind of how you expect timing and magnitude to compare year-over-year?

Douglas Shulman

I think it's still pretty early. As you know, tax refunds usually means we have slower originations in the quarter but we also -- some people use it to pay their loans. So we haven't seen anything wildly different than the last couple of years.

Operator

Michael Kaye, Wells Fargo.

Michael Kaye

So ex the impact of the mix effect of the front book back book and you also mentioned you're originating higher-quality loans. Can you just give some color on how credit is performing more like a like-for-like basis? Meaning how credit is trending across the risk grades?

Jenny Osterhout

Yes, I'd say in general, in terms of -- we don't -- we see all of our risk rates performing on the front book to expectations. So in terms of if there's variability in terms of expected performance, I'd say there is none. Obviously, you have different expectations for different risk grades, and it also goes much deeper than that in terms of how they come in and a variety of other factors. But in general, no, we see no variability across the front book.

Michael Kaye

Okay. And I saw a recent Fed report that shows the share of credit card accounts making minimum payments that rolls to a 12-year high. So I'm wondering if you look at your recent trends and the use of proceeds for your loans, like have you seen a surge in debt consolidation requests? I'm wondering maybe this is also adding to the higher loan demand you've been seeing and I think Doug mentioned a new debt consolidation product. Maybe just talk about that?

Douglas Shulman

Yes. Thanks, Michael. The -- we have not seen -- we've steadily had 30% to 40% of our loans people use for debt consolidation. Over the last year, we have really improved that product, added a lot of automation, which makes it much easier for people to automatically pay off the debt, and it's a smoother customer interface for them. And we've also explicitly been having some marketing around debt consolidation as a value proposition.
One of the reasons is what you stated. I mean there's been a real growth in balance of credit cards. And we think as we kind of if the environment remains stable and as we even get into a better environment, I think people will be potentially wanting to pay down their credit cards and the personal lending product is an opportunity for them to do that. And so we haven't seen a lot of movement yet, but we have honed our product so that we're ready if the market moves in that direction.

Operator

Mihir Bhatia, Bank of America.

Mihir Bhatia

First on the forward close. Jen, you touched on this in your comments, but could you expand on that a little bit. We've obviously seen in the last few months, private capital being very active. In the personal loan space, whether -- and others have been selling or choosing to originate loans on their behalf. So I was just wondering what's OneMain's view of that strategy? Can you just talk a little bit about how much -- how you balance originating for your balance sheet versus originating for private capital? Like what the economics are, what the puts are. Thanks.

Jenny Osterhout

Yes. Thanks, Mihir. We really look at these types of arrangements as additive versus necessary. So we show quarter after quarter that we have access to capital through the public markets. And we really see that access as a true competitive differentiator for our business. And so we did mention today that we selectively expanded our whole loan sale forward flow program. And this year, we'll have $900 million in committed flow arrangements through the end of 2025. But just -- and just for scale, that's larger for us, we had $500 million in commitments in 2024. And the most we've done in any year was $720 million in 2022.
So it is more -- we think of it as nice flexibility, and we're open to exploring opportunities for more arrangements, and we have quite a few discussions. We see it as an opportunity to diversify funding sources, but we don't need those types of arrangements. So that allows us to be very disciplined when we look at pricing and the economic trade-offs. And we're also -- we're looking at all pieces of how you make those arrangements work and it gives us some flexibility to make decisions in terms of how -- when we want to enter into those arrangements.

Mihir Bhatia

Okay. Great. No, that's helpful. And then maybe just turning to the credit discussion a little bit and the consumers held. And I guess what I'm trying to square is just you're continuing to originate, I think you said two-thirds of your originations were in your top risk grades. I understand that you still are dealing with the back book and you mentioned a third of delinquencies, I think, are from the back book still. But as we get later in the '25, into '26, what does that mean for your long-term loss rates or, I guess, the health of the customer? Like how much variability is there in charge-offs between your top risk rates and the lower risk rates? So just trying to understand, longer term, the implications are continuing to originate more and more loans in the top half or the top 2 buckets of your risk weights.

Douglas Shulman

Yes. I mean, look, let me give you some context because losses are a big driver, but we don't originate to a loss rate. We originate to 20% return on equity, on the equity we put into every loan. And we've got a model that includes the revenue, the operating expense, the interest and the losses. So some of this is depending on product and the price we can charge.
And -- so we haven't changed our longer-term guidance that, in general, in a totally stable environment will be in the 6% to 7% long term. But we are now headed down from what we think is the peak in 2024, and we're moving in the right direction in 2025 but it's going to be dependent on product. When we get there, it's going to be dependent on product mix, how we go. And again, we're trying to run a return on equity business and a profitability business, not just a, like get to the loss business. And so as I mentioned earlier, we like the direction of travel now. We had a couple of tough years with stuck with our back book. We've been turning it over and actively managing it. And I think moving from here going forward, we should see increase in earnings, increasing capital generation and a steady decrease in losses will be part of that.
Well, we're at the top of the hour. Let me thank everyone for joining us. As always, if you have further questions, please get in touch with the team. Thank you to all of our investors for the really high-quality, valuable engagement we had in 2024, and we're looking forward to talking with you more in 2025.

Operator

Thank you. This does conclude today's OneMain Financial Fourth Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. Please disconnect your line at this time, and have a wonderful day.