Heath Fear
Thank you, and good morning. For those of you that have attended one more of our Four in '24 events, we are grateful for your time and travel efforts. We will be hosting our final event in Las Vegas on November 18, which is the Monday prior to the NAREIT Conference.
We hope to see many of you and look forward to sharing our views on capital allocation and providing a glimpse into our long-term vision for KRG's future. While the response to Four in '24 series has been overwhelmingly positive, you can rest assured that the intellectual property rights to Five in '25 are currently available.
Turning to our results, for the third quarter of 2024, KRG earned $0.51 of NAREIT FFO per share and generated same-property NOI growth of 3%. Same-property NOI was bolstered by a 280-basis-point increase in minimum rent and 120-basis-point increase in net recoveries, offset by 80 basis points of bad debt relative to the comparable period.
Based on our third-quarter results and revised outlook for the balance of the year, we are increasing our 2024 FFO guidance by $0.01 at the midpoint to a range of $2.06 to $2.08, primarily driven by improvement in our same-property NOI growth assumption. At the midpoint, we assume a full-year same-property NOI growth assumption of 2.75% and a full-year bad debt assumption of 70 basis points of total revenues.
The full-year bad debt component is a function of combining the actual bad debt we experienced year-to-date, which was approximately 60 basis points of total revenues, with the continuing assumption of 100 basis points of bad debt for the fourth quarter. As our updated guidance implies, we are anticipating an acceleration in same-property growth for the fourth quarter due to the commencement schedule of our signed-not-open pipeline and the favorable comparable period.
In August, we returned to the public debt market by issuing a seven-year $350 million bond at a coupon of 4.95%. We felt it prudent to minimize the capital markets risk heading into 2025, and we are pleased with the execution.
On our July earnings call, we mentioned that we anticipated a significant improvement in credit spread compared to the levels we achieved in January. And we were able to achieve a 38-basis-point compression in a spread in less than a year. As for the proceeds, we are currently holding them in a short-term deposit account, generating interest income in excess of the yield on the debt maturing in 2025.
In September, we amended and extended our $1.1 billion revolving credit facility, which now matures with extension options in October of 2029. With a very dynamic macroenvironment in front of us, it's important to note that our availability under the line of credit together with our cash on hand can satisfy all of our maturing debt through the third quarter of 2028.
Looking through a more opportunistic lens, with over $1.2 billion of available liquidity and a net debt to EBITDA of 4.9 times, we have the ability to deploy significant capital, while still remaining within our long-term leverage target levels of 5 to 5.5 times. Thank you to the entire KRG team for another spectacular quarter and we're looking forward to seeing many of you in Las Vegas.
Operator, this concludes our prepared remarks. Please open the line for questions.
Operator
(Operator Instructions) Todd Thomas, KeyBanc Capital Markets.
Todd Thomas
Hi. Thanks. Good morning. Heath, it seemed like a little bit of a better outcome in the third quarter than you previously talked about. I think you talked about the third quarter being a little more muted and followed by a sharper increase in the fourth quarter.
It sounds like that's still the case, but where did you outperform versus expectations in the quarter? And was any growth this quarter pulled forward from the fourth quarter? And then as we think about ending this year and into '25, any sort of goalposts that you can put up around the next few quarters around the trajectory for NOI growth?
Heath Fear
So Todd, basically, I think just doing better on bad debt was the primary driver of what gave us a little bit better outlook into the same store for this particular quarter. And I wouldn't say that we pulled forward anything from the following quarters.
In terms of the trajectory of the same store for '25 and beyond, we're not going to give guidance this time. But we said before in our remarks that we're pretty bullish and optimistic with respect to the accuracy contributions we're going to see in our signed-not-open pipeline. So I'll leave that to our '25 outlook.
Todd Thomas
Okay. And then my second question for John, curious to just get a little more color on the acquisition environment and also the assets that you mentioned that are being marketed or on the market that you're comparing to One Loudoun a bit in that sort of ilk. Is Kite interested? What's the company's appetite like for being on the buy side of a transaction like that and adding another asset like that to the portfolio today?
John Kite
Sure, Todd. I mean in terms of your macro-question, I think the environment is strong. There continues to be more and more capital flowing into open air retail from, as we've talked about before, all sources that you can imagine, pension funds, sovereigns, insurance companies, REITs, 1031 buyers, advisers.
I mean I really think that the volume of capital that's flowing into our space in the past six to nine months has dramatically increased over the previous year. So that obviously leads to compression in yields that people are willing to accept, as well as the growth rates in these assets are clearly better than they were historically.
So all in all, I'd say it's a very competitive market. As we mentioned in the pre-prepared remarks, yes, there are assets that are now coming into the market that are similar to centers like Southlake and One Loudoun and Crown and Union Hill, and I can go on and on.
I mean we have a lot of assets. We mentioned two of them, but we have a lot of these high-quality assets that I think people maybe don't quite think of when they think of our company. So that's our goal, is to make sure people do understand that.
As it relates to would we participate in something -- in assets of that nature, would we look to buy those. That's why we specifically mentioned our balance sheet. We believe that we have, if not the best, and one of the very few best in the space. And again, don't feel like they're quite recognized for that. Debt to EBITDA at 4.9 times is dropping.
We have a lot of firepower, a lot of optionality. We have gone to absolutely be looking at what's available as we always do. And if we feel like that -- we think that we can add value and appropriate returns, and we are certainly in a position to execute it if we so chose.
I think what we're trying to say is that the value as it sits today. But the good thing is we have so much capital, and our balance sheet is strong, and our cash flow is growing, that we can still participate in the market if we choose to.
Todd Thomas
Okay, great. Thank you.
Operator
Alexander Goldfarb, Piper Sandler.
Alexander Goldfarb
Sure. Morning out there. John, maybe just keeping with that theme of going on -- looking at more centers to buy some of these potential larger centers. One of the things that you've spent many years, almost a decade doing, is improving the balance sheet, getting really low leverage and putting the company in a really good spot.
At the same time, unfortunately, the stock continues to trade at a discount versus peers. So how do you balance increasing leverage to buy assets if that risk sort of goes against what you guys have tried to do, which is say, hey, we've got a great company, great cash flow, we're leveraged and, therefore, deserve a higher equity multiple?
John Kite
Sure. Good morning back there, Alex. That's a great question. I think that's the point we're trying to make is that we do have a great value, and having a great balance sheet affords you that optionality. So I think we have to look at each individual opportunity under that lens of what is the potential growth rate of the asset, what value does it bring to the total portfolio, and what comparable offers do we have impacting the balance sheet, the asset and/or assets entail?
But when you're sub-5, and we've been clear that our long-term goals and objectives are low to mid-5s, that's a lot of runway. So I think, Alex, it's just I don't think we can say it's one thing. I think we have to look at each individual component of what we're pursuing to save this add value to the overall business.
But again, where we are today, we have plenty of room. So I think that we're studying and looking and see what happens. But again, if it doesn't happen, we continue to generate free cash flow out of the existing portfolio. Frankly, if we did that, we would continue to delever, and that just creates even more optionality.
Alexander Goldfarb
Okay. Second question is, you mentioned residential, which you showed us at One Loudon. As you guys have been assessing the portfolio and more investment opportunities, is there a sense of how much multifamily potential there is in your existing portfolio?
And also, is that something that is actively on your investment plan is to say, hey, let's add more multifamily? Just trying to get a sense of if One Loudoun is more (inaudible) case? Or if there's a lot more across the entire Kite portfolio?
John Kite
Well, I mean I think, as you know, Alex, we generally don't set these numbers out there and say we have to go chase them. I would tell you that we currently have an equity interest, and I think about 1,400 units. we mentioned that the next phase of Loudoun is going to be another 400 units. And I think we mentioned on top of that, there's another 1,400 units there alone and entitled.
As it relates to the balance of the portfolio, we generally said that the we will stay to the (inaudible), and so we're not going to drop and say we have to have 5,000 titled units. The reality is we will have several more thousand units over the next few years that we can pursue if we choose to.
But again, I mean, the real estate use to talk to this, the returns have to make sense. And we do generally like to have partners and share the risk and manage our capital contributions going in. I know some others don't do that, but that's what makes sense for us.
So it's a part of the business. It's clearly -- this densification is clearly a part of the business. And as we pointed out, we have a lot of these high-end assets where you can do this. But we're not trying to force it; we let it come to us.
Alexander Goldfarb
Thank you.
Operator
Floris Van Dijkum, Compass Point.
Floris van Dijkum
Thanks, and good morning, guys. By the way, John, I think your -- maybe it's just me, but your voice sounds a little muffled. Maybe you're too close. I'm not sure what it is, but it seems to be a bad connection. It's probably just me.
But question on your SNO pipeline, and obviously, as you project this forward, I mean, it's almost 5% of NOI, most of that's going to start to impact next year and in '26. I mean it's pretty heady underlying growth. So I mean, if things work out, we should see an acceleration in underlying growth.
Maybe if you can talk about the composition of that growth and how that's changing. Particularly as you start to get into the later innings of your anchor box repositioning, how much more upside do you see on your shop space? And where do you think the greatest growth opportunity on the leasing side lies that's still untapped for KRG?
John Kite
Sure. Does this sound better? Can you hear me?
Floris van Dijkum
It's still not as great. I apologize.
John Kite
Okay. I apologize too. I don't know what to say. Now we're moving microphones all over the place for us. So hopefully, you can hear me.
The bottom line is, I think the question is when I look out at the growth rates and where we're same store has been, and I think when we looked at where the occupancy gains are coming from, if you're looking at it like that, we clearly have more room to run in the small shops. The anchors are becoming close to where we were pre-COVID.
So I think that when you combine the lease-up efforts that you've seen us do over the last couple of years and you look at the growth that we're able to get in the shops, and it's 50% of our revenue, I think I would think that there's real upside there. I also think if you look at the point that we made at our same-store and you look at the signed-not-open rents versus our existing rents and the spread there, that's really incurring.
And then also, just the implied cash flow growth that we're able to generate as we have a better cruising speed, as you said. So overall, I think it's a combination of those two, but I hope that helps what you're looking for.
Heath Fear
Yes. Floris, I'll also add, the nice thing that is that will split between anchors and shops. So we're not seeing pockets of demand; we're seeing broad-based demand. And as John mentioned, at $26 in a bonded ABR, that's over $37 in the shops, and that's $18 in the anchors. Those are really, really strong (inaudible). Again, just a bit of the continued strong demand on the leasing front.
John Kite
Yes. And the only thing that I'd add is, we have the remaining boxes right now, and we are actively (inaudible) more than half of them. So I just said that momentum continues and we're able to continue to drive the strong spreads and returns.
Floris van Dijkum
Thanks, guys. And maybe my follow-up, and this is related more to capital allocation. But obviously, your bigger assets have grown -- particularly if you look at Southlake having grown NOI 50% over the past three years, bigger assets tend to grow at higher rates. As you think about deploying capital and other real estate, is that one of the key things that you consider when you're making investment decisions?
John Kite
Floris, I said that it's so specific to each individual asset. Obviously, if you're deploying more capital on a pro rata basis and you have the growth opportunity, that's going to move the needle more than a smaller deal. That being said, it really comes down to the individual quality of the asset.
And Southlake, as an example, was an asset that was kind of -- it was perfect timing in the sense of the merger and kind of applying our recent machine and being able to get those results. And we're seeing the same thing at One Loudoun. So I guess I would say that the bigger assets are intriguing in that way. But by the same token, we're really focused on the quality of the real estate.
And there's several large assets that we've looked at recently that we passed on based on the fact that we felt like the quality of the real estate in the long run wasn't going to support that growth. I mean we can get short-term growth, but we're really looking to get long-term growth.
Floris van Dijkum
Thanks, John.
Operator
Craig Mailman, Citi.
Craig Mailman
Hye, guys. Heath, you had mentioned bad debt came in a little bit better than you had expected. As you guys look out though over the next couple of months, I know the Container Store is being mentioned in the news now. They're not -- they're less than 1% of ABR for you guys. But like how are you thinking about tenant credit broadly, maybe for them specifically, over the next couple of months?
Heath Fear
Yes. So as we're looking out in the course of '25 and '26, nothing right now, Craig, that's giving us pause or wanting us to sort of separate and have a separate reserve for a particular tenant. We do compete now we go into next year that we're going to be able to manage and kind of fall out with a general debt bucket.
Now as it relates to Container Store, yes, it's (inaudible) of ABR. And if you've been following it, you'll see that they had a bit of a blip on their stock yesterday. For just some accounting notes, they have made a disclosure. But conversely, they also have a $40 million investment from the folks at Beyond. So there's good things happening there. Their debt extended -- this sponsor, the non-debt to be is actually even a huge amount, (inaudible) coming due in 2026.
And we think that on business in the brand is something that's going to survive. So we feel good that Container Store continues to do business. But this business is at seven spots in some of our best real estate. And if we have to, we'll release it. So again, we feel good about that. We think that's an under owned business. But of course, we monitor that closely.
Craig Mailman
That's helpful. And then I don't want to belabor the point on acquisitions here. But just maybe how you guys are thinking, you clearly have more runway in the near term with the SNO pipeline and the premium returns you're getting on that capital that's invested. But as you get through that, right, assuming your equity continues to trade where it is today, you will have the benefit of the higher cash flow as the leases commence.
But you guys are at a lower leverage point; you talked about potentially ramping that a bit. How do you think about if, say, the stock is still trading around this area and a year or two, right, you have a huge spread relative to debt. How comfortable are you or how high from a leverage perspective would you be willing to go to kind of grow the portfolio accretively even if cap rates are still inside of where the equity is trading? Or is that just a scenario where you guys are less interested in growing overall?
John Kite
So let me start with that. I think the bottom line is, yes, we're very aware of where our total cost of capital is. And we are aware that the equity isn't where it should be. That being said, we've been extremely prudent and, quite frankly, have done a great job in terms of what we've done in the bond market. So I think we're in a good position, Craig, to kind of see where this plays out.
We're still in that leasing mode. I mean we talked a lot about the accomplishments, that's great. We still have more leasing in front of us that can generate high returns on capital. And so that continues to be the highest return on capital.
As we move into late next year and into 2026, and as that starts to kind of absorb, then I think we're in a position, and we're generating even more free cash flow in '26 and '27, that all of this will come together and we will make some decisions around more treasury decisions, where are we investing the dollars. And to your question specifically, can we increase leverage? We can absolutely increase leverage. And frankly, if we let the 5.5, we'd still be low relative to the peers, and we're at 4.9.
So I think there's real movement there. And what we want to do is we want to increase leverage at all, we want it to be very accretive, obviously. And I think that will come to us. So I think we're in a great position.
And actually, as the market continues to improve, as lease-up continues to pop in, and the supply-demand characteristics are working in our favor, which I think at this point, looks like it will continue into next year. So we'll just be really selective and very good capital allocation decisions. And that's our primary job, is to make smart capital allocation decisions, and we'll do that and do it accretively.
Heath Fear
I'll just add, Craig, that kind of putting in perspective, we could acquire somewhere between $500 million and $600 million of assets, pick a cap rate and remain at 5.5 times, which is within our long-term target. And we think of that as we're doing that with debt. So when you think about the cap rates, we're very sort of sales and (inaudible) driven.
And I mean it's this context of a total when you have this cost to your capital, I mean, and it certainly not makes sense. A lot the based on our debt, we just issued a bond 4.95%, that allows us to lift the assets and use that to go to 5.5 and do something accretive and still maintain the quality that we want to maintain.
Operator
Andrew Reale, Bank of America.
Andrew Reale
Hi. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking our questions. Just on the Parkside acquisition, could you speak to the cap rate on that deal and the degree of compression after you lock that up? And your messaging continues to be that internal deployment is your best use of capital, but just curious if this latest transaction might signal a shift into more external opportunities?
John Kite
Yeah, sure. In terms of the cap rate, we didn't give a specific cap rate. I mean what we did say is that it was accretive to the assets that we sold in Chicago. And I would tell you that the cap rate that we were able to acquire it at is probably 50 to 75 basis points higher than it would be today based on the timing and the weight of time it took to -- for the seller to be in a position to close the deal. So it's a great deal for us.
And in terms of cap rates overall, my commentary there would be that they are compressed versus where they were three, four, five months ago in a significant way. And the type of assets that we own and the quality of assets that we own generally trades in the kind of mid-5s to low 6s. I mean that continues to be the market. But you gladly point that out as it relates to the imputed value of our stock price today.
What was the second part of your question, I'm sorry?
Andrew Reale
Just more broadly, I mean, your messaging it's still that internal deployment is your best use of capital. But just curious if that transaction is signaling a shift into a wider array of external opportunities?
John Kite
I think we do continue to be maintained -- maintain that desire to grow internally because it's very high returns on capital. And also, the overall environment is aggressive right now in terms of us trying to be able to find accretive opportunities.
That being said, the point we're really trying to make today is that we have such a strong balance sheet that we can lean into that at a time that we choose to. And I think as things -- if they move the way we think they're going to move, certainly in the next couple of quarters, that will be an opportunity for us to look to grow.
Heath Fear
I'll just add a comment to something that [Mark] said. At that at this point, we're seeing the light at the end of the tunnel. I mean all that lease -- and we really starting to think about what's -- our extended levers that we're going to pull. John talked about activating One Loudoun, and they're talking about a capacity acquisition.
So we're absolutely focused on what's happening after the (inaudible) is over. And that's going to be the main thing what we're going to be discussing in Las Vegas. So hopefully, you can make it, and then we'll talk some more details on.
Andrew Reale
Okay, thanks. And just a second question for me. Just curious what percentage of your 2025 leasing needs have been addressed at this point? And how does that compare to this time last year? And also, how far into the future are leases being signed for commencement beyond 2025?
Heath Fear
I would say about 50% of our leasing for 2025 have been addressed, which compares very selective last year. So I think we're on a very good track again, but the (inaudible) continues to be elevated.
John Kite
(inaudible) the timing and how leases are signed for delivery. So I think the answer to that is we are working on leases right now that could deliver in '26. So these periods can go out as much as one year just from a negotiation standpoint.
Operator
Daniel Purpura, Green Street.
Daniel Purpura
Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. You mentioned that you were focused on long-term growth instead of our short-term growth in your portfolio. In your experience, what would you say are the key variables that you look for as predictors of high long-term growth in a property, whether it be demographics or anything specific to the property?
John Kite
Yeah. I think for sure, first of all, it's the underlying quality of the real estate, then it comes down to the merchandising mix, the type of shopping center that it is, whether it's a lifestyle center or a grocery-anchored center or a community center, how much access we have to rents rolling over in the next three to five years and whether or not those rollovers have options associated with them, and are those options at a specific number, are they fair market value.
There's a lot of things that we look at as it relates to the ability to generate above-average embedded growth. And part of that is just how we go about doing the business. And that's why we made the comments about where we are this year versus last year, up 50 basis points in our embedded rents in the small shop portfolio as an example. And if you look out over the last couple of years, it's a huge increase in what we've been able to get in embedded growth.
So I think there's a good balance between our operating platform, which we think is one of the very best in the space. And I think if you look at our margins, and you look at our recovery ratio, and you look at our G&A to revenue, you look at real operating metrics, you'll see that we're one of the best, if not the.
And then it just comes down to the real estate. Can we impact the real estate? So I think there's a -- it's the fun part of the business. We're very good at it and we'll continue to look for those opportunities to find deals that we can push the growth.
Daniel Purpura
Got it. Thank you.
Operator
Dori Kesten, Wells Fargo Securities.
Dori Kesten
Thanks. Good morning. Is there any update you can provide on the process around the assets that you have held for sale? I guess are you finding that it's also rather competitive? And would you expect to close within the year?
Heath Fear
Absolutely expect to close within the year. And the asset is supposed to hit the market, I think, today or early next week. So it's imminent. And again, we're very confident we'll be able to transact within the one-year time period.
John Kite
Yeah, not within this year, within a year.
Heath Fear
Within a year, right? Within 12 months.
Dori Kesten
Got it. And then the percentage of small shop new leases renewals at over about 4% with the rent bumps. They continue to rise quarterly. It's pretty impressive. I think you're over about 7% for the year. Are you finding that you're going to -- that you have to give in other areas of the contract to achieve that? Or is the leasing environment purely supportive of that growth in your markets?
John Kite
No, not at all, Dori. We are -- in fact, we believe that we've improved our leases in terms of things that we've -- that always -- what's the right word -- negotiate with our customers, our partners. And I think that the environment has even gotten better as it relates to that.
So we're not actually foregoing anything in terms of the lease terms as it relates to what we're able to do in our embedded rent growth. And as you know, we've been very vocal around how important that is to our platform. And certainly, we believe that we've been the leader in our ability to generate internal embedded rent growth in the small shop business.
And now, we're obviously focused as well on the anchor side of the business, which, as you know, is harder, but we're making progress. And as supply and demand continue to move in our favor, it's only logical that that would get better. And I think that with the overall environment for retailers still being very strong, we should think that this can get better and continue.
Tom, you want to add to that?
Thomas Mcgowan
Yeah. The only thing I would say is be assured that our real estate team is not focused just on growth. It's one of their most important components as they come into real estate committee. But we care just as much about exclusives, about fixed-cam language, about making sure we have long-term flexibility in terms of surrounding areas around the entire parcel.
So we focus a lot of attention on that because those are the ones that from a long-term perspective, can create problems for the company. So our team does a great job of hitting growth in all the ancillary components with inside the document.
Dori Kesten
Great. Thank you.
Operator
Michael Mueller, JPMorgan.
Michael Mueller
Thanks. Just going back to the release when you talked about allocating more capital, retained cash flow to select developments. Was that comment just focused on the future Loudon opportunities or mixed use in general? And are there any projects that you're considering that are kind of really retail-driven and not mixed-use?
John Kite
Well, in terms of the comment, it was not just specific to One Loudoun. And I think what we were trying to say, Michael, is that as we're getting into the later stages of our lease-up of our existing platform, that cash flow can obviously increase over that period of time, and we can deploy free cash flow into development and redevelopment at very good yields on a risk-adjusted basis. That's always the goal.
And redevelopment, obviously, we believe that the risk-adjusted yields are probably going to be better. But ground up, as it relates to adding on to existing centers or even adjacent land to an existing center, can make a lot of sense. So I think we do believe that we can pivot into that direction and do it without doing any harm at all to the balance sheet.
So as we move forward, I think that that's important. As it relates to retail specifically versus mixed-use, again, that comes down to the product itself. I mean we recently delivered a retail-only development in Florida that was on a parcel of ground adjacent to a large center that we own in Port St. Lucie, as an example. That was a small grocery acreage center anchored by Fresh Market.
And they're doing extremely well. It's a good sign that we can find those opportunities. And as we generate more and more free cash flow, this is just going to be a really nice opportunity for us to drive value.
Michael Mueller
Got it. Okay, thank you.
Operator
Alex (inaudible), Baird.
Hi. Thanks for taking my question. First one for me is, which retail categories are being the most aggressive for new space in your centers?
John Kite
Tom, do you want to hit that?
Thomas Mcgowan
One of the categories we've had tremendous success with as of late, and we just took a trip out West to work on this further, is on the grocery side. We are finding many opportunities with some of the best names in our space. And that spans about three or four different category users.
So we've been extremely happy with that. We've continued to do very strong in your basic core box components, the Total Alliance, the Dick's, the Ross, recent deal with LL Bean, HomeGoods, Trader Joe's. So we feel like we've had an extremely successful approach in terms of diversifying the base while increasing the credit quality.
And that's been one of the top priorities as we've moved to lease up this portfolio. But I think the word all in all is just tremendous diversity of use with strong credit.
John Kite
Yeah. The only thing I would add to that is one of the benefits of the strength of our portfolio and the diversity of our asset base in our portfolio is that we're -- we have strong relationships with customers that span all types of retail.
And I would tell you that the pool is deeper than I've ever seen it in our -- really in the history of this business, in our ability to do transactions with everything from luxury retailers to service retailers. So open air is definitely positioned very well over the next several years to take more and more market share, and we're going to be a part of that.
Helpful. And for a second one, it looks like the total portfolio composition is about 47% to 53% anchor or shop. As the portfolio gets fully leased, what do you expect that breakdown to be moving forward?
John Kite
Well, assuming the portfolio doesn't change a lot, it won't change much. I mean we're generally going to be kind of in that 50-50 range, plus or minus. Remember, we also have almost 10% -- a little less than 10%, actually of our revenue as ground leases.
So that skews that number out a little bit. But bottom line, I think this composition is a really good composition because it's that balances both ends of the spectrum in terms of growth and stability.
Right now, everybody is focused on growth. There are certain times where stability is more important. And that's why we own lifestyle, we own mixed-use, we own grocery, we own neighborhood, we own community centers and a little bit of power. You put that all together, it's a pretty good portfolio.
Got it. Thank you. That's it for me.
Operator
Brendan Cutler, Jefferies.
Linda Tsai
It's Linda. Regarding Container Store, I know two are in your highest quality locations, One Loudoun and Southlake. Do you think these will lease up faster than the other five? And then what do mark-to-market rents look like overall?
John Kite
Hey, Linda, it's John. First of all, I think as Heath pointed out, it's not just those couple that you mentioned. I mean generally speaking, Container Store historically was a tenant that was pursued quite aggressively in high-quality properties. They generally are not in a property that wouldn't be viewed as very high quality. So I think all seven of them are positioned very well.
We're not at the stage where we're looking at mark-to-market based on the fact that, what Heath walked you through that we think that, at this point in time, there's nothing that would indicate that things are radically going to change in the near term.
That being said, there's lots of optionality on these particular boxes based on the real estate they're in. Also, the size, we could split these boxes, we could lease them to one particular user. The market still remains really strong. We hope we're not doing that. We hope that we just continue as is. But we're very confident that it would be very productive to get the space back.
Linda Tsai
Thank. And then (inaudible) mark-to-market cash spreads and higher contractual rent bumps, would you consider providing GAAP spreads in your disclosures going forward?
Heath Fear
It's kind of funny you ask that, Linda. We used to provide GAAP spreads and have it, but something that we're -- that's under consideration. So stay tuned. But needless to say, the GAAP numbers, especially when we're embedding 4% bumps on the shop side, would be much higher than our cash spreads.
John Kite
Yeah. I mean my personal thought there is now we have another metric out there that everybody doesn't report in the exact same way. But bottom line is our cash spreads, Linda, are very strong, and that represents the business gap. Obviously, we certainly can talk about what our GAAP spreads are, but they're a lot higher. Now whether that matters, I don't know.
Linda Tsai
Probably does. Thanks. (laughter)
Operator
I would now like to hand the conference back over to John Kite, Chairman and CEO, for any further or closing remarks.
John Kite
Well, again, I just want to thank everybody for joining us. Really appreciate your interest in the company. And we, hopefully, look forward to seeing a lot of you in Las Vegas at our final installment of Four in '24. Thank you.
Operator
This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating, and you may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
