Yahoo Finance

Thank you, Todd.
Good morning.
I will begin with the review of the fiscal first-quarter performance of each of our market sectors. Our expectations for each sector for the fiscal second quarter and some directional sector commentary for fiscal 2025. I will also review the annualized revenue contribution of our wins performance for each market sector and then provide an overview of a funnel of qualified manufacturing opportunities.
Starting with our Aerospace and Defense sector on slide 8, revenue decreased 13% sequentially in the fiscal first quarter, below our expectation for a high single-digit decline. Near-term market challenges in the commercial aerospace subsector and a delay in the ramp of a recent manufacturing win more than offset strength in the space subsector.
We expect revenue for the Aerospace and Defense sector to be up high single digits in the fiscal second quarter. Reflective of the broad-based increases in customer demand more than offsetting the near-term commercial aerospace market challenges.
Our wins for the fiscal first quarter for the Aerospace and Defense sector were healthy at $29 million. As evidence of our growing success and momentum in supporting our US defense customers and those of our allies, wins included our largest single award with any defense prime contractor. We also want the engineering development of a control unit for a defense aerospace program, reflecting our diversification efforts for our engineering solutions to enable growth. And finally, our position as the partner of choice for an existing customer was further strengthened with the award of a product line expansion for advanced air mobility and markets.
Although we anticipate a stronger second half of fiscal 2025, the reduction in near term commercial aerospace production rates is limiting the anticipated growth contribution among ongoing wins and share gains. Long term, we remain optimistic in delivering robust growth in the commercial aerospace subsector. Given a substantial backlog of demand for new and more fuel-efficient airplanes.
As such for fiscal 2025, we now anticipate modest growth for our Aerospace and Defense market sector with strong defense and space subsector demand being substantially offset by the commercial aerospace market production challenges and conservatism in our forecasting process.
Please advance to slide 9.
Revenues in our Healthcare/Life Sciences market sector was down 10% sequentially for the fiscal first quarter. Below our expectations of a high single-digit decrease driven by demand, softening inside the quarter.
For the fiscal second quarter, we expect the Healthcare/Life Sciences sector to grow revenue high single-digits, driven primarily by strength and new program ramps. Fiscal first quarter, sector wins of $130 million marked the third consecutive quarter of strong performance. Wins included a substantial expansion of our engagement with an existing customer which also establishes Plexus as a strategic supplier for this customer's ultrasound products. We will build this assembly in our Guadalajara, Mexico campus. We also won a substantial follow-on award for a monitoring device in our Penang, Malaysia campus.
An existing customer provided a significant award for our team in Scotland. The product is an AI enabled surgical visualization guidance system that supports robotic surgery. We will now be engaged with this customer in all three regions. All three of these awards resulted from our focus on operational excellence, which we define as zero defects and perfect delivery.
As we look to our fiscal 2025, we remain optimistic for a return to growth for the Healthcare/Life Sciences sector driven primarily from the strength of program ramps and share gains.
Advancing to the industrial sector on slide 10. Revenue decreased 2% sequentially in the fiscal first quarter. The result was above our expectation of a mid-single digit decrease and primarily driven by inside the quarter demand increases from customers and our semi cap and test and measurement subsectors.
Our fiscal second quarter outlook for the industrial sector of a high single digit to low double digit revenue decline reflects continued soft end markets, more than offsetting growth in the semi cap subsector.
The industrial market sector wins for the fiscal first quarter were $53 million. Included in this result is a significant win with a new customer for an enhanced industrial vision technology product to be built in our Guadalajara, Mexico campus. We awarded the work based on our proactive engagement and the breadth of our offering including engineering product development and automation services.
Our wins also included the addition of sustaining services for an existing manufacturing customer and the energy management subsector. This product is built in our Appleton Wisconsin facility.
We're also awarded a new product launch with an existing semi cap customer. The product will be built in our Penang, Malaysia campus. This strategic award is a reflection of the responsiveness and success we've demonstrated on prior product watches.
Supporting our outlook of growing semi cap momentum per Plexus, our wins this quarter included awards from all of our top five semi cap customers. Our expectation of growth for the industrial sector in fiscal 2025 remains unchanged. Share gains and new program ramps are driving growth for our semi cap subsector while the broader industrial markets continue to reflect instability and soft demand.
Please advance to slide 11 for a review of our funnel of qualified manufacturing opportunities.
The funnel of qualified manufacturing opportunities remains robust at $3.6 billion and reflects a mid-single digit sequential increase. In summary, the strength conveyed through our share gains and multiple new program ramps positive leading indicators from our engineering solutions and our robust, qualified funnel of manufacturing opportunities, creates optimism for growth. Even as many market subsectors are currently experiencing uncertain near-term outlooks or demand softness.
I will now turn the call over to Pat.

Thank you, Oliver. And good morning, everyone. Our fiscal first quarter results are summarized on slide 12.
Gross margin of 10.3% was to the top end of our guidance and consistent with the previous quarter. Selling and administrative expense of $49 million was slightly above our guidance. Primarily due to additional stock-based compensation expense. Non-GAAP operating margin of 6% was also toward the top end of our guidance and delivered on our target margin of 6% or above for the second consecutive quarter.
Our regional teams drove operational efficiencies and managed spending, which helped mitigate the impact of losing substantial fixed cost leverage given the lower sequential revenue.
Non-operating expense of $3.4 million was favorable to expectations due to improved foreign exchange performance and lower than anticipated interest expense as we deployed free cash flow to reduce debt. Non-GAAP diluted EPS of $1.73 exceeded the top end of our guidance due to the previously mentioned factors and a slightly favorable tax rate.
Turning to our cash flow and balance sheet on slide 13. We were extremely pleased with our free cash flow performance to start fiscal 2025. We delivered $54 million in cash from operations and spent $27 million capital expenditures resulting in free cash flow of $27 million. This result was above our expectations and represented our best fiscal first-quarter cash flow performance in five years.
We utilized our strong free cash flow to continue support of our share repurchase program, acquiring approximately 85,000 shares of our stock during the quarter for $13 million. We have approximately $37 million available under the current $50 million authorization.
Similar to the prior quarter, we ended the fiscal first quarter in a net cash position. We had $15 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility with $485 million available to borrow under the facility.
In addition to increasing our cash balance, we have also reduced our borrowing by more than half over the past year. Our gross EBITDA ratio is conservative at less than one.
For the fiscal first quarter, we delivered return on invested capital of 13.8%, which was 490 basis points above our weighted average cost of capital. Our invested capital base is significantly lower due to our efforts to drive sustained improvements in working capital. This combined with improved operating performance drove better ROIC over the comparative periods.
Cash cycle at the end of the fiscal first quarter was 68 days, five days favorable to expectations and sequentially higher by four days. This result represents close to a 30% improvement in our cash cycle days from one year ago.
Please turn to slide 14 for details on our cash cycle.
Lower revenue was a leading factor to the sequential increase in several cash cycle categories. While days and inventory sequentially increased, gross inventory dollars continued to decline this quarter by over $20 million. This reduction represents the fourth consecutive quarter of decline with gross inventory now of $360 million lower than the fiscal 2023 high point.
Days in accounts payable sequentially increased by 10 days due to the lower revenue and timing of supplier payments and inventory receipts. With the return of close to $85 million in customer deposits, we experienced a three-day reduction in advance payment days.
As Todd has already provided the revenue and EPS guidance for the fiscal second quarter, I'll review some additional details which are summarized on 515. Fiscal second-quarter gross margin is expected to be in the range of 9.7% to 10%. At the midpoint, gross margin would be approximately 50 basis points lower than the fiscal first quarter. This reduction is primarily due to our typical seasonal compensation cost increases and the reset of payroll taxes for US employees.
We expect selling and administrative expense in the range of $48.5 million to $49.5 million, which is consistent with the prior quarter despite seasonal compensation headwinds of more than $1 million. Note that the estimate for selling and administrative expense is inclusive of approximately $6.2 million of stock-based compensation expense.
Fiscal second-quarter non-GAAP operating margin is expected to be in the range of 5.3% to 5.7%, exclusive of stock-based compensation expense. Non-operating expense is anticipated to be approximately $4.5 million. We continue to anticipate low interest expense with our reduced borrowing.
For the fiscal second quarter, we are estimating an effective tax rate between 14% and 16% and diluted shares outstanding of $27.7 million. In support of anticipated program ramps, our expectation for the balance sheet is that working capital investments will increase compared to the fiscal first quarter. Based on our revenue forecast, we expect this level of working capital will result in cash cycle days in the range of 69 to 73 days. At the midpoint, cash cycle days would be sequentially higher by 3 but lower by 20 days compared to last year's fiscal second quarter.
With investments to support anticipated program ramps, we expect break even to a slight usage of cash for the fiscal second quarter.
Fiscal 2025 capital spending is still expected to be in the range of $120 million to $150 million, increase from the $95 million spent in fiscal 2024. Despite higher capital spending and investments in working capital to support growth, our strong fiscal first-quarter free cash flow positions us to now generate up to $100 million of free cash flow for fiscal 2025.
With that, Liz, let's now open the call for questions.

Question and Answer Session

Operator

(Operator Instructions)
David Williams, Benchmark.

Hey, good morning, gentlemen. Thank you for taking my questions.
I guess, maybe first, if you could talk a little bit about the industrial segment. And you talked about the semi cap being strong, but it degradation and some of the demand trends in the broader areas. Can you maybe run through that a little bit deeper? Maybe some puts and takes and where you're seeing that weakness? And is this something you expect to continue through the year or is this more short term. If any color there, I think would be helpful.

Yeah, David, this is Todd, and good morning. I'll start with a discussion around semi cap and then I'll turn it over to Oliver and he can get into some of the broader dynamics within the industrial market.
So semi cap, we're expecting a really strong growth here. I would say high teens on order for us as we look at it right now. We realize and understand that above market growth right now, but it continues a trend we've had over the past near decade of outgrowing the market because of share gains and new program wins. So, we expect to continue that trend and it's supported even further out as Oliver mentioned through the program wins that we had this quarter that are reflected across all five of our top customers.

Yeah, and it's reflecting on the broader industrial markets, really. I mean, we're seeing it across, David, most of our other subsectors. So communication, the measurement, electrification, automation, all seeing software demand. We do anticipate that in the longer term that it will rectify, but as Todd noted, that's currently offsetting from that semi cap growth.

Great, thanks. And then maybe secondly, I know that Aerospace and Defense has been an area that you've been really optimistic about just the growth trends there. And it seems like clear that the Palmero is having some way or weighing that down this year. But is there anything else we should be thinking about there? It feels like maybe that Boeing business should come back this year and just wondering if there's any catch up there and then if there's anything else within that Aerospace and Defense outside of that, that you're seeing real weakness in that gives you any indication that it's going to be a softer year this year. Thank you.

Yeah, I think, David, you're hitting on some of the key points. I think, long term, the dynamics in our Aerospace and Defense sector are fantastic and we're really bullish about the long-term growth prospects for the sector. We had been quite bullish about fiscal '25 entering the year. But with some of the production challenges and challenges getting production rates up within of the OEMs in that space, it's had a dampening of demand for this fiscal year that's offsetting some of our other sectors.
So if we look at our other subsectors, excuse me, if we look at those which Defense, Space and security all are showing nice growth trajectories this year, particularly Defense and Space. So, longer term outlook is great for the whole sector. I mean, one of the things I'd like to come back to is when we look at commercial aerospace, there's actually an 11.5-year backlog with the OEMs in that space. So that demand, it will pick up as the production rates pick up. One other point too is we've taken a conservative bias in our forecasting as well too because we really don't want to get caught by another slowdown of production within that space.

Great. Thanks so much. Certainly, appreciate it. I'll jump back in the queue.

Great. Thanks, David.

Operator

Jim Ricchiuti, Needham & Company.

Hi, good morning. A question just -- I'm sure you've been getting quite a bit from investors. How are you guys, as well as your customers, just thinking about and tariffs, which admittedly is a moving target? And maybe you can remind us of the impact during the first go around with this administration and you know, possibly the differences we might see this time around, again, recognizing that this is still pretty fluid.

Yeah, so Jim, good morning. This is Todd. I'm going to start and I'm going to talk about how we're thinking about tariffs today and I'm going to pass it over to Oliver and he can provide a little bit more detail as to what we did previously.
But I would say, as you mentioned, it's very fluid. So, what we do is we're continuing to monitor it very closely. One of the things we've done over the course of the past year is we've invested quite heavily in our trade compliance organization to monitor and help our customers. So we've invested in people, organization and tools to be better equipped to provide great solutions on that front.
A couple of things though that just to remind people of is one, from a footprint standpoint, we're in really good shape. So if we need to move products around based off of tariffs as they would potentially occur, we're well positioned to be able to do that. Also, point out that when we look at the cost of tariffs, those are costs that we pass on to our customers. So we're cognizant that it could impact demand overall, but we shouldn't bear those costs directly within our business. So that -- so again, we're continuing to monitor it very closely and just taking a wait and see, but we'll respond very rapidly as things occur and change.

Yeah, this is all maybe just to add a little more color and support of Todd's commentary there.
As Todd talked about our global trade organization, we've aligned that all under one global trade organization. And one of the things that enables us to do is be very nimble, consistently execute across the globe and flow resources to wherever they're needed. Todd also mentioned investment and tools, so specifically their trade management system and what that enables us to do is our folks are more efficient and they can focus on value-add activities for our customers. By way of example, we can assess their supply chain risk of a customer's bond; and then offer scenario planning, back to the customer.
And then the last thing I'll mention is the fact that just with our strong playbook and recent history here, we've got really strong customer engagements, trade organization, leadership to trade organization, leadership. And we think that will be far out well, here in the coming quarters.

And a couple of points I'll add on to, Jim, your comments about how do we address the tariffs last time. We ended up moving facilities on a few different products, not a huge amount. We certainly source components into different regions and these are primarily China impacted tariffs at that point so we did that. But also, again, going back to the whole cost of tariffs, we did not absorb cost when it came to tariffs.

Got it. Thank you. And I wanted to go back to the earlier question just about industrial and semi cap. You know, there are clearly some areas of strength and weakness in industrial which I think we appreciate.
It's a little interesting to hear you guys talk about the robust growth, you're anticipating in semi cap. Just given the increased uncertainty around the WFE market in the last couple of months, are you having, I assume you're having ongoing conversations with customers. Has anything changed with respect to what you're hearing from some of those customers?

Yeah, I wouldn't say it's changing markedly. And I think when we look at semi cap on a customer-by-customer basis, I think some are bullish and some are maybe a little bit more conservative based off of what their market.
You know, we're certainly not betting on WFE and Wafer fab equipment. And a lot of this again comes back to share gains that we've been able to take over the course of the last couple of years.

Got it. Okay. Thanks. I'll jump back in the queue.

Operator

Steven Fox, Fox Advisors.

Hi, good morning. I was wondering if you talk a little bit about, excuse me, trends in Europe. It looks like your revenues in Europe were down particularly strong. You just turned the corner in terms of turning that region profitable. So what was driving most of the decline? How -- what's the outlook for profitability out of the region this year? And then I'll have a follow up.

Yeah, I'll start and then see if any of my colleagues want to add anything, and this is Oliver.
Yeah. Just in terms of our outlook at Europe, what you're seeing is essentially of the same trends that Todd talked to from our various subsectors in Europe with the extra dynamic that I would say that the industrial softness that we're seeing on a macroeconomic basis is hitting Europe harder than our other regions. And so I think that's what you're seeing in the numbers there.

Yeah. And Steven, from a profitability standpoint, I mean, we have seen improved utilization. We have done some restructuring in that region. We've had a real focus on profitability with customers. And I think that's starting to show through with the profitability and our expectations for the remainder of this year.

That's helpful. And then just as a follow up, I know it's early days with the new Trump administration. But is it affecting maybe what type of end markets look attractive to you? Maybe over the next couple of years, obviously, you've had some electrification winds, policies changing, maybe diverting resources based on that or based on what your customers are saying. Is that something we should be watching for as maybe this year unfolds?

Yeah, I think its potential there, Steve, that it could impact markets. I mean, one of the things that we're seeing in electrification in particular is there's extreme softness in Europe. There's actually a bit of a growing demand in the US just from the standpoint that it's starting from zero in essence. So while it may slow the ramp, I think it'll help us from an end market standpoint, but we're going into our strategy planning process right now. And we're looking pretty deeply at markets and where do we think we need to potentially expand our markets and our market focus a bit further than what it's maybe been today. And that will certainly have an impact on what happens within the Trump administration and what I would say becomes more favored industries.

Great. That's all helpful.

Operator

Steve Barger, KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Hey, good morning, gentlemen.

Hey, Steve.

For semi cap, I hear you on outgrowth due to share gains. But for your existing programs, does this seem like a really durable demand increase or does it feel like some of these orders are in excess of demand to build some inventory?

Yeah, I don't think it seems an excessive demand. Now, as I mentioned though, Steve, it varies on a customer-by-customer basis. I mean, certain process steps and certain customers have more bullish demand than others do and it varies. So, I wouldn't call it necessarily a strong demand environment in semi cap right now, but it's certainly stable on aggregate.

And presumably see sequentially increasing as you think about the back half of the year?

Modestly.

Okay. And then you mentioned conservatism in your guidance for Aerospace and Defense several times. Can you just talk about what that means from an internal modeling process? How are you approaching those assumptions and staging the production arm relevant to that conservatism?

Yeah, I'm going to start here, Steve, and Shawn may have some stuff he wants to add as well too. But when we look at the Aerospace and Defense sector, we have a really good understanding of what we build, what planet goes on, in essence, so we understand where it's headed what the end markets are. And when we talk about conservative, what we do is we look at production rates for certain models and we derate those based on what we think could be more of a call it a worst-case scenario.

Understood. Shawn, anything?

Nothing bad.

Thanks.

Operator

Ruben Roy, Stifel.

Yes, hi. Thank you for letting me ask a question.
Todd, you talked, I think, probably about my question a bit here so sorry if I'm repeating. But I did want to tie back some of the commentary around customer discussions, tariffs, et cetera to one of the comments you made in your prepared remarks, which was you were seeing some changes in customer forecasts. So talk about Aerospace and Defense being down a little bit more than you had expected and then Oliver talked about demand softening inside of the quarter in Healthcare and Life Sciences. Just wondering if that's driving the bulk of the changes in customer forecasts or if it was broader based, if the customers are pausing a little bit, given some uncertainty out there. Would love a little more detail around that comment. Thank you.

Yeah. I mean, what I'd say, Ruben, is that there's just a fair amount of volatility particularly around well the Healthcare and the Industrial sectors, some ups, some downs. Probably slightly biased to down and then Aerospace is really commercial. Aerospace is the trend that has been impacted and that's just a result of production rates that are going on within commercial aerospace right now.

Yeah. Hey Ruben. It's good to hear you on the call. It's Shawn.
I would say of the volatility, of the variances we had seen in customer forecast in the quarter, there was almost no mention of the change in administration or tariffs or anything of that nature, either pushing out demand, pulling in demand. It was a rounding year if that occurred. And so, the changes we've seen forecasts are more based around the market fluctuations Todd mentioned than any other factor.

Great. I appreciate that.
Just quick follow up. It's great to hear about the engineering solutions and getting to your high. Wondering, you did talk about increasing diversification, I would imagine that gives you a little more visibility as well into shorter of revenue albeit, could be further out. But am I thinking about that correctly? You know, as you get involved on the solution side, are you gaining more visibility into the timing of program ramps and that type of thing?

Yeah, definitely, Ruben. And I mean, one of the things that's important is that when we take on an engineering program, it's almost a near certainty that we're going to manufacture that program as well too. So, it tends to be a nice predictor for, call it future manufacturing wins and future manufacturing growth, and we particularly like the increased diversification from a couple of different fronts. One is, I think, it gives us an ability to be able to grow that service faster and it's also a high margin in addition to driving revenue growth. And it also gives us better insights into the rest of our markets as well, too.

Good stuff. Thank you.

Thank you, Ruben.

Operator

Anja Soderstrom, Sidoti.

Hi. Thank you for taking my questions.
I'm wondering about the CapEx spend for the year, you guided that to be up this year compared to last year. Do you still expect that? And how should we think about that for 2026?

We do expect that, Anja. And we had mentioned last quarter that we do have a new facility going up in Malaysia and that's about $60 million of that range of 120 to 150.
For '26, I think we'll see that come back in line and if you look at capital spending the last couple of years, the way I look at it is trying to peg between 2.5% to 3% of revenue. Fiscal '23 and '24 were below that range. Fiscal '25 may be slightly above that range. On average will be with pretty much right in the middle of that 2.5% to 3% range
I would mention, though, I think it's important to note that even with that higher capital spending and some investments in working capital for our program ramps this year, we're going to deliver a really nice free cash flow year of up to $100 million. So pleased with the results this year, especially coming off the year last year where we saw a lot of reductions in working capital.

Okay, thank you. And then just in terms of the growth margin, it seems like that's going to be hit a bit this quarter from the marriage case or sub compensation. How should we think about that for the second half?

Yeah. We, typically, I mean this quarter, we're going to be hit with about 60 basis points of margin from the compensation and payroll reset. We, typically, start to see productivity improvements even this quarter to help absorb that impact. And so growing the margin back up to around 10% gross margin the rest of the year I think is is reasonable to model.

Okay. Thank you. That was all for me.

Operator

(Operator Instructions)
Jim Ricchiuti, Needham & Company.

Yeah. I wanted to go back to some of the larger program wins you alluded to, congrats first on those. What I'm trying to understand is, I assume that this also started with engineering services activities you had with these customers. And you know what, when did the original work start to the point where you actually are in a position now where you see the program, you see the size of the program, I mean, trying to get a better understanding of that lag that you guys had talked about between engineering services and seeing those program revenues.

Yeah. Yeah, Jim, this is Oliver. I'll start and then if any of my colleagues want to add anything in.
I would say that for some of the specific programs that I've mentioned here today, relative to the larger wins, those were not engineering developments. And then the other thing I'll point out is that from a sales cycle, it can be long. So from the first mention with the customer that there's something there that they might have interest for us to produce for them to the point at which we have that closed a contract, a forecast and we can announce that to yourself as a win could be multiple quarters.

And then, Jim, once we announce that manufacturing win, it can be from a year and a half to three years before we're producing product close to the expectation of normalized volume depending upon the regulatory dynamics associated with the product where it's being launched.
And so just because we win something today, the likelihood of it actually affecting fiscal '25 is low, but '26, '27 gives us a lot of momentum. And so if you think back the last year of all those Healthcare wins, that provides us a lot of momentum. But let's say, for example, within the Healthcare/Life Science sector in years to come.

Just one real quick, Jim, example of what Shawn is talking about there is if you compare a win with a customer versus a target with a customer, it's likely they might have engaged us earlier to start allowing us to pipeline the supply chain, which can obviously be a number of quarters long. Whereas if it's a new customer to collect, we're only going to start that after we get the program award. So, that could also cause some variation across program.

But some of the major things you talked about today potentially could impact the business in fiscal '26.

Yeah, definitely. Definitely. It could even be a little bit in late '25 but it'll be small compared to '26.

Okay. And then final question for me. Pat you know, the improvement that you are seeing in cash flow just relative to a few months ago, how much of that is due to just Q1 being better or is it? And I assume it's due to greater working capital efficiencies, did you think about the year as a whole?

Yeah. I'd say that's the case, Jim. I mean, we were really pleased with the first quarter around activities around past due receivables, aged inventory collections from customers for deposits. A lot of effort put in. And I think the last four years, we've seen negative free cash flow in the fiscal first quarter and this is the first time in five years we've seen positive. So there is some movement probably from Q2 to Q1 of that improvement, but we're still overall improving the full year for free cash flow.

Just to add a little extra color there. This is Oliver. Part of what we're experiencing today is the sustained work and benefit from the focus that we put on free cash flow across the organization in fiscal 2024. So we talked about some of that previously, we really drove organizational awareness and education down into the organization at the decision making level. Lots of good visual management tools to help connect action to outcome. And all of that, I think, created momentum for us and part of what we're experiencing here is the continued momentum from us as we built that into our systems of management.

Thanks. Thanks a lot.

Operator

Melissa Fairbanks, Raymond and James.

Hey, guys. Thanks so much.
At the risk of belaboring a subject, I wanted to kind of dig in a little bit on what you're seeing in Industrial. On the semi cap side of things, excuse me, are you willing to quantify how much semi cap or maybe semi cap plus test is as a percentage of the total industrial revenue?

Yes, it's right around half of the overall industrial revenue.

Okay, great. That's super helpful.
On the comps side of things, I know that business, you had seen a little bit of tailwinds there, that business tends to be a little bit more cyclical than maybe some of your other broader based or less mature end markets. I was just wondering if you could give a little bit of detail what you're seeing there on the comps side. I know it's a relatively smaller piece of the business, but still, obviously impactful.

Yeah, it's a small chunk and probably the best way to describe it if I was going to use a word would be choppy. It was up and down is kind of the way I would call it. So we're looking at that, I mean, there's still the potential of some of the efforts around the Beat initiative too, that could provide some upside as we look further out.

Okay. How short cycle does that business tend to be? I mean, do you get at least a little bit, I've dealt with choppy in that end market for my whole career. But it tends to be a little bit shorter cycle than some of the things that you see in Aerospace or the rest of Industrial.

Yes. As you well know, forecast change in order. And so that market there is a long term trajectory there, there's technology transitions which we are participating. But the intra quarter and quarter-to-quarter dynamics can be, I said choppy.

Okay, great. Good to know that hasn't changed.
Maybe one quick question for Pat. just looking at the tax rate, you had a little bit of a favorable tax rate benefit in the December quarter, March quarter, we're looking at full tax. Is that geographic mix based or is there something going on there that we need to contemplate going forward?

No, you're right. It's geographic. There is nothing significant that jumps out in the last couple quarters impacting that tax rate. It's more the profitability we're recognizing in certain countries that may have a benefit from a tax holiday. And obviously we're watching closely the new administration and what that could mean for tax legislation over the next several years.

Okay, great. Thanks. guys. That's all for me.

All right, thanks, Melissa.

Operator

There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back over to Todd Kelsey, President and CEO, for closing remarks.

All right. Thank you, Liz. I wanted to take us back to our expectations around fiscal '25 before exiting the call. And what I want to point out is that our expectations haven't changed much from what they were a quarter ago, other than the exception of commercial aerospace. So, we're still expecting low to mid-single digit revenue growth in the year and growth across each of our market sectors.
We started off the year in Q1 with hitting our target margin of 6% non-GAAP and we anticipate that we'll get back to that level as we move through the fiscal year. And that's despite the 70 or so basis point headwind that we faced from merit and US payroll Q2 of which we've already overcome a piece of that as we're entering into Q2.
The other thing I want to remind is our free cash flow is looking strong and approaching $100 million. So when you combine all those factors together, we're expecting solid EPS leverage throughout the fiscal year. And finally, again, I would like to thank everybody who joined us today, our shareholders, investors, analysts, and our Plexus team members so we appreciate your support.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.