John Doyle; President, Chief Executive Officer, Director; Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc
Mark McGivney; Chief Financial Officer; Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc
Martin South; President, Chief Executive Officer of Marsh; Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc
Dean Klisura; President, Chief Executive Officer of Guy Carpenter; Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc
Nicholas Studer; President; Chief Executive Officer of Oliver Wyman Group; Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc
Gregory Peters; Analyst; Raymond James
Michael Zaremski; Analyst; BMO Capital Markets
Jimmy Bhullar; Analyst; JPMorgan Chase & Co.
David Motemaden; Analyst; Evercore ISI
Alex Scott; Analyst; Barclays Capital Inc.
Meyer Shields; Analyst; Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
Elyse Greenspan; Analyst; Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Paul Newsome; Analyst; Piper Sandler & Co.
Operator
Welcome to Marsh McLennan's earnings conference call. Today's call is being recorded. First quarter 2025 financial results and supplemental information were issued earlier this morning. They are available on the company's website at marshmclennan.com.
Please note that remarks made today may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and a variety of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such statements. For a more detailed discussion of those factors, please refer to our earnings release for this quarter and to our most recent SEC filings, including our most recent Form 10-K, all of which are available on the Marsh McLennan website.
During the call today, we may also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these measures to the most closely comparable GAAP measures, please refer to the schedule in today's earnings release. (Operator Instructions)
I'll now turn this over to John Doyle, President and CEO of Marsh McLennan.
John Doyle
Good morning and thank you for joining us to discuss our first-quarter results reported earlier today. I'm John Doyle, President and CEO of Marsh McLennan. On the call with me is Mark McGivney, our CFO; and the CEOs of our businesses, Martin South of Marsh; Dean Klisura of Guy Carpenter; Pat Tomlinson of Mercer; and Nick Studer of Oliver Wyman. Also, with us this morning is Jay Gelb, Head of Investor Relations.
Marsh McClennan had a solid start to 2025. As we said, coming into the year, results in Q1 faced headwinds due to several factors, and our performance tracked well with our expectations. Overall, we grew revenue 9% in the quarter, reflecting continued momentum and underlying revenue growth and contributions from an active year of acquisitions in 2024.
Underlying revenue grew 4% despite lower fiduciary interest income and a tough comparison to a strong Q1 last year, and we saw good growth in all four of our businesses.
Adjusted operating income increased 8% from a year ago. Our adjusted operating margin declined 20 basis points compared to the first quarter of 2024, reflecting seasonality at McGriff, and adjusted EPS grew 5%.
Turning to the macro picture, clearly the global economic outlook has become more uncertain since the start of the year. Ongoing trade negotiations will continue to create challenges for businesses, and this has led to reduced consumer and business confidence, as well as financial market volatility.
The outlook is likely to remain uncertain as stakeholders continue to assess the potential impacts on global trade and businesses pause new investments. As a result, expectations for GDP growth, inflation, interest rates, and other factors have become less predictable.
As far as the insurance industry is concerned, tariffs would likely be inflationary to the overall cost of risk. This comes on top of the increasing frequency and severity of natural catastrophes and rising social inflation costs.
We continue to support our clients by leveraging our expertise and solutions as they navigate challenges and make decisions in this period of extreme uncertainty.
In fact, we've been advising clients for years on risks to their global supply chains, which now includes disruptions in trade policy. Sentrisk, our AI-powered supply chain platform, which we've highlighted in past calls, is a good example of our work to assess clients' vulnerabilities to ongoing trade negotiations. In addition, through webinars and thought leadership, accessed by thousands of clients, we're helping them understand the complexity of the moment.
In times like these, our clients find value in Marsh McClennan's unique perspectives, talent, and capabilities across risk, strategy, and people.
And while we are not immune to shocks in the macroeconomy, we are well positioned to navigate these environments. Our track record of performance across economic cycles is a result of the strength of our business and the consistent demand for our advice and solutions.
I would like to share some thoughts on resilience and preparedness for natural disasters and the role of insurance. The earthquake that struck Myanmar and Thailand is just the latest tragic reminder that we live in a time of heightened exposures to catastrophes.
This tragedy, along with the California wildfires and recent flooding in the US, highlights the devastating human toll and economic impact caused by natural disasters, especially taking into consideration the significant proportion of losses that are typically uninsured. These events show the urgent need for resilience and risk mitigation planning in disaster prone areas.
Enhancing risk mitigation is essential for sustainable development and reducing the devastating impact of these events on individuals, businesses, and economies.
In catastrophe prone areas, we must invest in ways that strengthen our infrastructure and lessen the impact of future disasters.
To put this into perspective, a recent report from the US Chamber of Commerce shows that every $1 spent on resilience saves communities $13 in damages, cleanup costs, and economic impact.
US homeowners are increasingly reliant on state-sponsored insurers of last resort in catastrophe-prone areas. In these circumstances, pricing that accurately reflects the true cost of risk can often be compromised in favor of making insurance more available and affordable.
Governments and regulators can help by prioritizing resilience and creating the right economic incentives to mitigate losses and foster sustainable improvements in insurance markets.
Without increased resilience, the human toll will remain high, and the cost of risk will continue to be a significant tax on economies, diverting funds from other important societal priorities.
Turning to insurance market conditions, according to the March Global Insurance Market Index, rates decreased 3% in the first quarter, despite an elevated risk landscape. This follows a 2% decline in the fourth quarter of 2024. As a reminder, our index skews the large account business.
Overall, rates in the US decreased 1%. Latin America was down low single digits. Europe, UK, and Asia were down low to mid-single digits, and Pacific was down high single digits.
Global property rates decreased 6% year over year, following a 3% decline last quarter. Global casualty rates increased 4%, with US excess casualty up approximately 16% in the quarter. Workers' compensation decreased mid-single digits. Global financial and professional liability rates were down 6%, while cyber also decreased by 6%.
In reinsurance, despite the California wildfire losses, capacity remains more than sufficient to support compliant demand, including additional limits and loss impacted programs.
Throughout the first quarter, market conditions were consistent with what we saw at January 1. Strong reinsurer profitability, high ROEs, and increased capital levels have resulted in ample supply of property cat capacity and rate reductions. It was also a record quarter for cat bond issuance.
US property cat reinsurance rates remain competitive for the April 1 renewal period. Non-loss impacted rates were down 5% to 15%, while loss impacted programs typically experienced 10% to 20% rate increases.
In US casualty reinsurance, we continue to see a range of outcomes depending on loss experience, with primary carriers demonstrating limit, rate, and underwriting discipline.
In Japan, April 1 property cat rates overall were down 10% to 15% on a risk adjusted basis. Early signs for the June 1, Florida cat risk renewals points to similar market conditions seen in January and April with an anticipated increase in demand ready to be absorbed by more than adequate supply. As always, our focus is on helping clients navigate these dynamic market conditions.
Now let me provide a brief update on our acquisition of McGriff, which closed on November 15 last year.
Our colleagues at McGriff performed well in the quarter, and the integration remains on track. The team is quickly leveraging the broader capabilities of our company while bringing their own distinct advantages to the market. We are already seeing wins from bringing together the best of both.
As we said when we announced the transaction, McGriff is a business with outstanding talent and a track record of strong growth, and I'm excited to have them as part of our firm.
Now, let me turn to our first-quarter financial performance and outlook, which Mark will cover in more detail.
Revenue grew 4% on an underlying basis, with 4% growth in RIS and 4% in consulting. Marsh was up 5%. Guy Carpenter grew 5%. Mercer 4%, and Oliver Wyman was up 4%.
We had adjusted operating income growth of 8%, and we generated adjusted EPS in the quarter of $3.06 which was up 5% from a year ago. We also repurchased $300 million of stock in the quarter.
Turning to our outlook for 2025, we continue to expect mid-single digit underlying revenue growth, another year of margin expansion, and solid adjusted EPS growth.
Of course, this outlook is based on conditions today, and the economic backdrop could turn out to be materially different than our assumptions.
In particular, and as discussed earlier, the uncertainty and ongoing trade negotiations and their effect on consumer and business confidence could have a significant impact on the global economy and our results.
In summary, we are pleased with our results and are off to a good start in 2025. We are well positioned and have a resilient business that provides critically important advice and solutions, and we have proven our ability to deliver across cycles.
With that, let me turn it over to Mark for a more detailed review of our results.
Mark McGivney
Thank you, John, and good morning. Our first-quarter results represented a solid start to the year.
Consolidated revenue increased 9% in the first quarter to $7.1 billion, with underlying growth of 4%.
Operating income was $2 billion and adjusted operating income was $2.2 billion up 8%. Our adjusted operating margin was 31.8%. GAAP EPS was $2.79 and adjusted EPS was $3.06 up 5% over last year.
Looking at Risk and Insurance Services, first-quarter revenue was $4.8 billion up 11%, or 4% on an underlying basis. Operating income in RIS was $1.6 billion in the first quarter. Adjusted operating income was $1.8 billion, up 8% over last year, and our adjusted margin was 38.2%. Our margin in RIS reflected the impact of seasonality and McGriff's revenue we've previously guided to.
At Marsh, revenue in the quarter was $3.5 billion up 15% from a year ago, or 5% on an underlying basis. This comes on top of 8% underlying growth in the first quarter of last year. The US and Canada underlying growth of 4% for the quarter. In International, underlying growth was 6%. Latin America up 8%, EMEA up 6%, and Asia Pacific up 4%.
Guy Carpenter's revenue in the quarter was $1.2 billion, up 5% on both a GAAP and underlying basis. Growth remained solid despite softer reinsurance market conditions and came on top of 8% growth in the first quarter of last year.
In the Consulting segment, first quarter revenue was $2.3 billion up 5% or 4% on an underlying basis. Consulting operating income was $456 million and adjusted operating income was $491 million up 8%. Our adjusted operating margin in consulting was 21.2%, up 50 basis points from a year ago.
Mercer's revenue was $1.5 billion in the quarter, up 5% or 4% on an underlying basis. Health underlying growth was 7%, reflecting continued solid growth across all regions. Wealth was up 3% led by investment management.
Our assets under management were $613 billion at the end of the first quarter, down 1% sequentially, and up 25% compared to the first quarter of last year. Year-over-year growth was driven by our acquisition of Cordano, positive net flows, and the impact of capital markets.
Career declined 1%, reflecting growth in international offset by continued slower demand in the US.
Oliver Wyman's revenue in the first quarter was $818 million, an increase of 4% on both a GAAP and underlying basis. Growth in the quarter was led by strength in the US and came on top of 13% growth in the first quarter of last year.
Fiduciary income was $103 million in the quarter, down $9 million from the fourth quarter, and $19 million compared with the first quarter last year, reflecting lower interest rates. Looking ahead to the second quarter, we expect fiduciary income will be approximately $100 million.
Foreign exchange was a $0.05 headwind in the first quarter. Exchange rates have been volatile over the past several trading days, making it challenging to predict their impact looking forward. However, based on current rates, we anticipate that FX will have an immaterial impact on earnings in the second quarter and the rest of the year.
Turning to our McGriff transaction, as John mentioned, our integration continues to go well. As we said last quarter, the first quarter is McGriff's seasonally smallest from a revenue perspective, which resulted in modest dilution to adjusted EPS in the quarter. We continue to expect that McGriff will be modestly accretive to adjusted EPS for full year 2025, becoming more meaningfully accretive in 2026 and beyond.
We still expect noteworthy charges associated with McGriff of approximately $450 million to $500 million in total through 2027, with the vast majority of these costs associated with retention incentives, a significant portion of which was put in place by the seller.
These costs flowed through our financial statements but were funded by the seller through a purchase price adjustment. As is our convention, we are excluding the riff from our underlying growth calculations for the first year.
As we mentioned last quarter, we are now excluding acquisition-related intangible amortization and the net benefit credit from our adjusted earnings. Last quarter we provided a supplement to our press release that recasts historical financial information on this new basis of reporting.
Total noteworthy items in the quarter were $91 million, the largest of which was $69 million related to McGriff. Interest expense in the first quarter was $245 million up from $159 million in the first quarter of 2024. This increase reflects higher levels of debt associated with the McGriff transaction.
Based on our current forecast, we expect interest expense will be approximately $250 million in the second quarter. Our adjusted effective tax rate in the first quarter was 23.1%, which compares with 23.9% in the first quarter last year.
Our tax rate benefited from favorable discrete items, the largest of which was the accounting for share-based compensation similar to a year ago. Excluding discrete items, our adjusted effective tax rate was approximately 25.5%.
When we give forward guidance around our tax rate, we do not project discrete items which can be positive or negative. Based on the current environment, we expect an adjusted effective tax rate of between 25% and 26% in 2025.
Turning to capital management, our balance sheet. We ended the quarter with total debt of $20.5 billion. In the first quarter of 2025, we repaid $500 million of senior notes that matured in March. Our next scheduled debt maturity is in the first quarter of 2026 when $600 million of senior notes mature.
Our cash position at the end of the first quarter was $1.6 billion. Uses of cash in the quarter totaled approximately $800 million and included $405 million for dividends, $95 million for acquisitions, and $300 million for share repurchases.
We continue to expect to deploy approximately $4.5 billion of capital in 2025 across dividends, acquisitions, and share repurchases. The ultimate level of share repurchase will depend on how our M&A pipeline develops.
Overall, we are pleased with our first quarter results. For the full year, we continue to expect mid-single digit underlying growth, margin expansion, and solid growth in adjusted EPS.
However, as John mentioned, this outlook is based on conditions today, and the economic backdrop, especially in light of recent uncertainty around global trade policies, could turn out to be materially different than our assumptions.
With that, I'm happy to turn it back to John.
John Doyle
Thank you, Mark. Andrew, we are ready to begin Q&A.
Operator
Certainly. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions)
Gregory Peters, Raymond James.
Gregory Peters
Well, good morning, everyone. Probably very appropriate to go back to the commentary around the tariffs and the trade issues and challenges. Maybe you can provide some additional color on which geographic areas, and might it show up inside the risk businesses and does this benefit the consulting business as well as your clients look for more advice?
John Doyle
Yeah, I'm sure, Greg. Look, I think it's difficult to say on a country-by-country basis what parts of our business might be more impacted. Obviously, there's much more in front of us all, in terms of those negotiations, and so, it's quite a fluid situation.
At this point anyway, I would say there's no real direct impact to our business, but of course there'll be indirect impacts. global GDP, may slow at least, until there's some resolution. As business confidence declines, we'll see market volatility, of course, in our investment business, and that's -- could create some challenges in our OCIO business but also creates some possibilities around the advisory work that we do on behalf of our clients.
And as I noted in my prepared remarks, it's likely to be inflationary on lost costs. Again, we'll see how things settle out, remains to be seen, of course, what it might mean to drug costs in the United States and our employee health and benefits clients here in the US. And obviously, for the global economy, a quicker resolution to these negotiations is important, so businesses and consumers can move forward with greater confidence.
But, as you mentioned, change is generally good for our consulting businesses and so again we're not immune at all to macro-GDP pressure, but we are a resilient business and again as we see it now, we continue to expect mid-single digit revenue growth, margin expansion, and solid growth in adjusted EPS.
Do you have a follow up, Greg?
Gregory Peters
Absolutely, my follow up question just pivot back to the capital allocation commentary. One of your peers is also pretty active in the marketplace and encountered some, antitrust issues, with their, pending acquisition. And I know you've -- you have a robust record of doing acquisitions in North America and elsewhere. I'm just curious what your view is as you continue to evaluate the landscape of potential opportunities, how that might square or reconcile with growing antitrust potential risks?
John Doyle
Yeah, I'm not familiar with the details, of course, of that particular issue, and obviously, you can check with them. We're very thoughtful and mindful of antitrust risks and have executed very effectively. I also think it's pretty unclear where the current administration, may come out on our industry and broadly speaking on M&A.
As you point out, for a long time it's been an important value creator for us. We remain quite active in the market We did four small deals in the first quarter. Our pipeline remains strong, and we have a really attractive reputation as a partner in that marketplace.
And so -- and, last year again was, just an outstanding year for us. I talked about McGriff in my prepared remarks, Greg, but I would also note, we acquired 2 other top 100 agencies in MMA last year, Fisher Brown Bottrell and Horton, and in addition to that, we acquired Cordano and Vanguard's US OCIO business in our investment business. So you know it was really a terrific year for us in that respect.
So we're excited about the possibilities going forward. I'd also note, while we're on the subject, we're more likely to continue what's mostly been a string of pearls type strategy for us. We have the capacity to do something bigger, but we're not just looking to get bigger, we do want to grow, of course, but we want to get better along the way. And the businesses that I mentioned make us better, not not just bigger, and so, we're really excited and so far so good on all of them.
Thank you, Greg. Andrew, next question, please?
Operator
Mike Zaremski, BMO Capital Markets.
Michael Zaremski
Hey, thanks. Good morning. Maybe going kind of back to the macro backdrop, and, it makes sense in the prepared marks, the less predictable and uncertainty, unless those words were used. I guess when we -- historically when we look at Marsh's revenue growth, kind of sensitivity to the macro, the company's done a great job kind of managing its expenses to kind of manage through on the profit margins to make it kind of a more shallow of an impact.
I know over the years too that I think you've worked, Marsh's worked to make some of its businesses like career potentially also less macro sensitive, but I just kind of curious, are you guys adopting a similar playbook right now given the uncertainty to kind of manage your expenses and are using kind of the same playbook as the past or is it tougher now given just the unpredictability of certain factors?
John Doyle
Yeah, thanks, Mike, for the question. Let me talk about the quarter, just the first quarter, just for a second.
As I said, it was a solid start to the year. It was largely in line with what we had expected. And we guided to a slower start to the year, right? So we did anticipate slower GDP in the first quarter. Fiduciary income, of course, was going to be under some pressure due to lower interest rates. Mark talked about the impact there, and we anticipated a bit softer pricing in the PNC market. So all of that factored into our guidance and our expectations around the first quarter.
And then at the same time, last year we just had an outstanding start to the year, and it was our strongest quarter of growth during the year. And so we expected some macro headwinds and got them, and we had a very tough comp as well. But again, in line with our expectations.
Growth overall was good though. It was solid across all of our businesses, on a GAAP basis very strong again on the strength of some of the acquisitions that I mentioned from a year ago, and I thought we executed well in the quarter.
So -- and I've, shared our outlook, but yeah, we certainly model downside scenarios to revenue. We model upside scenarios too. I think it's important so that we're constantly doing that, so we're being as thoughtful about capital allocation, as thoughtful about expense management regardless of the environment. Again, whether we have tailwinds or headwinds, we're constantly doing that. It's a critical part of our management playbook.
And in downside scenarios, yes, we have levers to pull and we know what they are and we spent a fair amount of time talking about them, and so, have things, Mike, like incentive and sales comp that are naturally going to fall off in a slower revenue growth environment, we of course would look to slow discretionary spending, T&E, other outside services, as an example, and we can slow hiring, right?
Comp and ben is obviously a meaningful part of our overall expense picture and we can harvest voluntary turnover attrition as well. So and then in more severe scenarios, there are other levers to pull and so we model those things.
We're not, however, going to damage the business in the medium to long term, right? We want to grow our business and be there for our clients, and we know, not far down the road, there'll be a brighter economic picture than there is today. So and again, we have a track record across economic cycles. Again, we know the leverages to pull and we will pull them as we see data emerge that requires it.
Do you have a follow up, Mike?
Michael Zaremski
Yeah, quick follow up. I don't know if you have any -- I think you cited, in the Marsh Pricing Index that global property continued to decelerate kind of quarter over quarter. I know global property, if you look back over many years, pricing accelerated a lot. I'm just kind of curious, does it -- I know you guys are working hard obviously to get your clients better rate, but, would you expect, at a macro level global property rates to continue to be a negative territory, kind of assuming normal catastrophe levels just given just the extent of how hard that market was for a long period of time?
I don't know if there's any terms and conditions changes that are taking place or any color there it seems to be the -- I think we all know casualties is the problem child, but property seems like it continues to soften, so just looking for color. Thanks.
John Doyle
Yeah, sure, Mike. Maybe I'll share a couple of high-level comments and then I'll ask both Martin and Dean just to talk about what they see in the market. So as I said, we expected a bit of a softer market, prices -- I'm not declaring it a soft market, just to be clear, but prices softened a bit in the quarter, we expected that, and it is, as you point out, welcome relief to our client after -- clients after five years of pricing.
I mentioned in my prepared remarks, you may have seen strong underwriting results for both insurers and reinsurers and, on -- given those results, they're more growth oriented maybe than they've been over the course of the last couple of years.
Property was the most notable rate of increased decline on the other side, as you point out, casualty, particularly casualty here in the United States and excess liability, that market is under some stress from our client's perspective.
But Martin, maybe you could talk a little bit about the insurance market in the quarter and share some thoughts with Mike?
Martin South
Of course, delighted to. And also, as we mentioned, our global rate index declined 3% in Q1. It's the third consequential quarter of rate declines. And overall, though, the composite rate index remains up 1.5 times since its inception in 2012. So to your point, it's been a long period of pain for our clients.
Just going through the lines of coverage, casualty saw rates of 4% globally, the most consistent for the last quarter. The US continues to see rate increase to the highest level, 8% across the board, and 16% in the umbrella and excess casualty. Property is down 6%, with the US and the Pacific experienced the largest decreases, followed by the UK at 6%. And all other regions saw low single digit declines. FINPRO is down 6%, cyber down 6%, reflecting previous trends.
But keep in mind that our index uses a larger account as we mentioned. We have a diversified business with large exposures to the middle market where pricing tends to be less cyclical. However, our focus is obtaining the best outcome for our clients with the most coverages and the best value, and we continue to do an excellent job doing that.
John Doyle
Thank you, Martin. Dean, maybe you can share some thoughts on the reinsurance market?
Dean Klisura
Great, thanks, John. And Mike, I'll give you a little bit of color on the April 1 reinsurance market, mostly focused on property cat here, which I think a key driver in the ecosystem of the market. But in April 1, we saw a continuation of market conditions that we experienced in January 1.
As John noted, we continue to see a very competitive market with a modest increase in client demand, mostly from personal lines and E&S riders that are both driving underlying primary insurance rate increases. As John noted, capacity in the property market has been ample, driven by very strong reinsurer returns in 2024, reported as 16% as in indices.
The reinsure appetite for property cat continues to increase. They're writing more. They've been more aggressive. But I think the real takeaway, the headline, Mike, is that the California wildfires had really little or no impact on pricing terms and conditions in the property cat market in April 1. John talked about US property cat. We saw 5% to 15% rate decreases for non-loss impacted accounts.
Turning to Japan, which John touched on, we saw a very orderly property cat renewal in April 1. Again, capacity was strong. Many of our cat programs were oversubscribed in the market. We see stable demand from clients in Japan really offset by greater increases in capacity, few structural changes, attachment points, that were hard fought two years ago, literally stayed unchanged in the Japanese marketplace, and property cap rates were down 10%, 10% to 15% on average in Japan. Again, really no impact from the California wildfires, on the Japanese market.
Capital is plentiful in the reinsurance market. We talked about at the January 1 renewal that dedicated reinsurance capital was up 7%. We see capital increasing. We see reinsurers deploying more capital. We see a very strong ILS market. John talked about record cat bond issuance. So all these things are adding up to additional capital and capital deployment in the property cat market.
John Doyle
Thank you, Dean. Mike, just one last thought is, the market's now pricing in well in excess of $100 billion of insured cat losses. So it's obviously early in the year, though, as you know, Guy Carpenter's biggest quarters are the first and second quarter, right?
So that's really a reflection of treat renewals and where they are in the calendar. So impacts to us will be really down the road if the cat season turns out to be very different than what we expect.
But thank you, Mike. Andrew, next question, please.
Operator
Jimmy Bhullar, JP Morgan.
Jimmy Bhullar
So I had a question just first on Oliver Wyman. And I'm assuming that the uncertainty and all the trade talk is creating some demand in certain verticals, but overall, is the environment and the increased uncertainty positive? Or is it overall a negative for all Oliver Wyman just as companies are sort of pulling back from budgets and just activities declining?
John Doyle
Yeah. Thanks, Jimmy. We had, I think, a good start to the year for Oliver Wyman. It was 4% growth on top of 13% last year. So just a big, big quarter a year ago, so a tough comp.
But sales have been solid. As you point out, it is discretionary spend. So maybe I'll ask Nick to share a little bit more color about what we're seeing in that market.
Nicholas Studer
Thank you, Jimmy. Maybe just a bit of context, which I know I often put in place first. But we do see this through the cycle as a mid- to high single-digit growth business, and we have been in a bumpier part of the cycle on the demand side, the geopolitical policy and economic uncertainty is not brand new. But also on the supply side, we've had a couple of years where oversupply in the industry has been working its way through.
And you'll have noted, we did not appear on the list of large suppliers to the US government but that has created some increased oversupply. But notwithstanding all of that bumpiness, the market continues to grow. We are very happy with the first quarter, as John said, given the high comp. Within that, as you note, there are some strong areas of growth.
The US and Canada, Mark called out, but also our insurance and asset management and actuarial practices, which are increasingly working closely together, have standout growth. We saw good growth in consumer telecoms and technology, also very strong growth in transportation and advanced industrials and our banking practice as well did well.
And our finance risk and restructuring practices were also in double digits, less even growth elsewhere. I think to get to the number of your question, as you know, we have a relatively short visibility. When the big questions for our clients change, that tends to be very good for our business.
When there's a lot of confusion and short-term uncertainty, that is less so. It can often lead to a little bit of a freeze. I don't think current events necessarily pressed a tougher period ahead. It's a bit too early to tell. So we're on watch.
But for now, we remain very busy. We're confident in our ability to help our clients in their most transformative moments when the big questions change.
John Doyle
Thank you, Nick. Jimmy, do you have a follow-up?
Jimmy Bhullar
Yes. Maybe just for Dean, you gave some good color on renewals recently, 1/1 in April as well. Should we -- are you expecting midyear renewals to be similar in terms of terms and the changes in attachment points and pricing? Or do you expect a change one way or the other?
John Doyle
Dean?
Dean Klisura
The answer is yes. We expect a continuation of market conditions that we experienced at January 1 and April 1. The market in Florida remains very stable despite the hurricanes last fall. So we expect cap pricing to be very, very similar as 1/1 and 4/1.
We see an adequate supply of capital in the Florida market. And certainly, the active cat bond market has kind of bolstered that impact to capacity. We see clients buying more property cat limit at the -- sorry, it's June 1 renewal. And we're starting to see benefits from the Florida legal reforms really lowering frequency and severity in the Florida market. So definitively, yes, to your question moving forward.
Operator
David Motemaden, Evercore ISI.
David Motemaden
Just another question, just given the macro environment and some of the policy questions. Could you help me think through how much exposure Marsh has across the company to government consulting or government contracts?
John Doyle
Yeah. Thanks, David, for the question. Nick talked about it touched on it a bit in terms of US governments at Oliver Wyman. We do work for governments all over the world.
And most of that work is in Oliver Wyman than Mercer, but Marsh and GC have a little bit of it as well. A lot of that work is really important advice. I talked about resilience and sustainable development in my prepared remarks, a lot of the work is around that, those subjects. But what I would say to you, David, is that overall, that work is not material to the company overall.
David Motemaden
Great. And then could you just help me think through the underlying revenue growth slowdown in Marsh within US and Canada specifically? I know the comp was tougher, but I'm wondering, was it all just the pricing slowdown? Or was there any impact from maybe a little bit of overlap with McGriff and some of the existing Marsh book. Just looking for a little bit of color there.
John Doyle
Yes, for sure. And I'll ask Martin to jump in, but unrelated at all to McGriff and as Mark noted, McGriff's not in our underlying revenue calculation, and we couldn't be more pleased with how McGriff has gone to date. We've got a lot of work still in front of us, but so far, so good and remain very, very excited about that. But Martin, maybe you could talk about growth in the US in particular.
Martin South
Of course, John. Yeah, so solid start to the year with 5% growth, which, as you say, was on top of a big comp. And in the US in particular, US growing up 4%, which is on top of 8% in 1Q '24. Still strong performance in MMA. And whilst McGriff is now in our underlying growth, we're thrilled to their start of the year, specialty performance was particularly strong. We saw an uptick in FINPRO.
Offsetting this performance, there was weakness in construction and proxy. Construction really is a reduction in new business driven by some of the uncertainty around the geopolitical environment and the cost to rebuild, and property rates accelerated their decline to 9%.
So whilst we don't look at one quarter to growth to evaluate performance over time, our US business has seen tremendous growth in the post-pandemic area. We're very well positioned in the future and our international business, continues to grow well, 6% on top of 8% in the first quarter of '24 so strong new business growth. Latin America, 8% on top of 8% in Q1 last year. EMEA 6% on top of 9%; APAC 4% on top of 6%. And particularly strong growth in our Benefits business, which is performing well around well.
John Doyle
Thank you. Thanks, Martin, and thank you, David. Andrew, next question please.
Operator
Alex Scott, Barclays.
Alex Scott
I think a couple of different times, you mentioned how much your indices kind of skewed towards the larger end of the market. So I was wondering if you could give maybe some color on what you're seeing in your middle market business and just if there is a divergence, how big is that diversion you're seeing in terms of how cyclical the businesses are to pricing?
John Doyle
Yeah, Alex, thanks for the question, and good morning to you as well. It is interesting. I mean I think it's not a recent phenomenon, but really over a long period of time where the middle market tends to be -- tends to provide much more consistent pricing from year to year. So middle market pricing was essentially up a couple of points in the quarter. You'll hear underwriters, of course, ensurers report on rate change throughout the earnings season here.
The biggest difference between what they report and what we report is new business. And so we have a view because it was our client a year ago of how that rate change materialized. And typically, new business will trade at a better -- slightly better price than from the client's perspective than a business that has renewed.
So but the gap is what you see. A couple of points favorable in the middle market is what we observed here in the United States. And large account market can move much more in a cyclical fashion.
Do you have a follow-up, Alex?
Alex Scott
Yeah, and thanks for that response. The other one I wanted to ask about is just when I think through a lot of these numbers you've thrown out, property, there is a bit of a headwind there in terms of pricing, good your clients are getting some relief, but do we need to think about 2Q and just being a more property heavy renewal quarter? I mean how much seasonality -- I guess it's not a typical seasonality, but just how much year-over-year do we need to be thinking about for property specific to 2Q because of that concentration?
John Doyle
Yeah. Look, I think it's hard to predict future markets. Dean talked about it in terms of reinsurance. There is a seasonality to the reinsurance business, right? So with a lot of property cat exposure, of course, being in the United States and because insurance companies want to have some level of certainty around what their reinsurance programs look like as they pursue their goals during the course of the year, the beginning part of the year is where really almost all of the action is from a reinsurance perspective.
So Dean spoke to that, it's been a competitive market. And it's really a reflection of what's been very strong underwriting results at insurers and reinsurers. And as I said, many of them are looking to grow given the results they've printed the last couple of years. So we expected that for sure. At Marsh, it's going to be, in a retail business, it's going to be more account to account and driven by some market forces, of course, but ultimate loss experience by clients.
So again, we continue to see an increase in frequency and severity of nat cats, not just here in the United States, and we see inflation continuing to be a challenge. So over time, we think the cost of risk is continuing to rise. It's why I was spent some time in my prepared remarks talking about the need for communities to invest in resilience, right? There's, in my view, too much discussion about how to find cheap insurance or subsidize insurance. Of course, insurance costs are important to a local economy.
I'm not trying to discount the importance of that. But ultimately, the way to deal with that is to bend the risk curve, and we need investment. We have more -- much more exposure to cat prone areas than we've had in the past. And so we'll manage through the cycle of pricing. We expect it to be more competitive throughout the year. But over time, those costs are continuing to grow.
Thank you, Alex. Andrew, next question, please.
Operator
Meyer Shields, KBW.
Meyer Shields
From an external perspective, in other words, from our perspective, how should we think about the impact of reinsurance pricing impacting Guy Carpenter's organic growth? Is it comparable to what we see in primary insurance, are dynamics different there? And how does the, I guess, significant amount of loss-impacted accounts coming up for renewal at midyear impact organic growth prospects for Guy Carpenter.
John Doyle
Yeah, thanks, Meyer. What I would say is, if you recall, when reinsurance pricing was going up meaningfully, we talked a bit about this because I think you all were trying to get a sense of revenue growth to the upside, our business there. We get paid in commission at Guy Carpenter. But of course, we're very transparent with insurance company clients. And so we negotiate essentially an outcome.
And so in some respects, it can act fee like. But again, with pricing pressure, does impact our revenue line overall. But we thought we had a terrific start to the year at Guy Carpenter, some of the market forces that helped what's been just an outstanding period of growth over the last couple of years have subsided. But again, we've factored that into our guidance. And the work we do on behalf of insurance companies is absolutely critical helping them navigate the complexity and the volatility that economies.
And of course, natural catastrophe is a huge part of that. So again, think commission but also think negotiated outcomes.
Meyer Shields
Okay. That's very helpful.
John Doyle
Do you have a follow-up here?
Meyer Shields
Yeah, just a quick one. You talked about the overall EPS impact on -- from foreign exchange. Did that impact either the segment's margins materially?
John Doyle
Mark, maybe you can jump in.
Mark McGivney
Yeah, Meyer, no FX was not a story for margins in the quarter. And actually, the impact even on earnings segment to segment was pretty even.
John Doyle
And Meyer, I would just add -- yeah, Meyer, I would just add that the headwinds on margin expansion came from M&A, right? And primarily McGriff, but the other deals that I mentioned last year as well -- and there's -- Mark and I both have mentioned the seasonality of McGriff revenues, all those businesses clearly make us better. So happy to trade a quarter of margin contraction for what will become a bigger and better business as a result of those deals.
Thank you. Andrew, next question, please.
Operator
Elyse Greenspan, Wells Fargo.
Elyse Greenspan
My first question, I wanted to go back to Guy Carpenter. On the 5% organic growth in the quarter, I was just trying to get a better sense of what's driving that? I know you guys are talking about pricing demand, et cetera. But what kind of drove the slowdown there in the quarter? And I'm particularly interested if you can give us a sense of new business as well as renewal trends in the Q1 within that 5%.
John Doyle
Sure, sure. So Elyse, again, we are pleased with the start to the year at Guy Carpenter's 5% growth. We had an excellent start to the year. Last year, we had 8% underlying growth in the quarter. Client demand for our services remains quite strong.
Obviously, as we just talked about with Meyer, pricing impacts growth at least in the near term. But Dean, maybe you could share some thoughts on where we see opportunities for growth and some of the contributing factors aside from price that impacted us in the quarter.
Dean Klisura
Yeah, thanks, John. And good morning, Elyse. As John noted, property cat is a growth headwind in the quarter and moving forward. again, we saw a very balanced growth globally across our regions and our Global Specialty business. we're driving outstanding growth in Latin America and the Middle East, where we've invested heavily.
To your point, Elyse, we had very strong new business in the quarter, including record cat bond issuance Guy Carpenter placed eight discrete bonds in the quarter, totaling $1.8 billion of limit, maybe our strongest quarter ever in the cat bond market. We're seeing great opportunities from our new capital and advisory practice.
And we started a small boutique banking practice. We're raising capital for clients, we're providing M&A advisory or designing sidecars, reciprocals and other capital structures for clients, and that business is really going well. And we do see clients purchasing additional property cat limit, given favorable market conditions.
And so as you know, and Meyer asked the same question, the first quarter is 50% of our year revenue-wise. So that's out of the way. And we feel solid about our prospects for growth through the balance of the year.
John Doyle
Thank you, Dean. Elyse, do you have a follow-up?
Elyse Greenspan
Yeah. My follow-up question. I was hoping maybe you'd be willing to disclose the revenue growth McGriff saw in the quarter. And then is there seasonality we need to think about in the other three quarters of the year? Or is it more consistent revenue in relative to, obviously, there was a negative seasonality in the Q1?
John Doyle
Yeah. I'm not going to get into disclosing revenue by sub business and sub business quarter-to-quarter. But as we said, it was a good start to the year for McGriff. We're very, very pleased with the results to date. And while McGriff -- again, it's a business we admired for a long time.
We've had a similar approach to really creating client value to our company. colleague retention and notably, producer retention has been outstanding to date. So it was a good start. It extends our reach to the middle market, which we really like. They had industry and specialty capability that we know can strengthen MMA as well.
That now positions MMA as about a $5 billion business on an annual basis. And so -- and the possibilities for us to bring scale benefits to middle market clients is a real opportunity there. So I don't think there's any kind of big lumps up and down, Mark, but maybe you can talk more about the seasonality for McGriff the rest of the year.
Mark McGivney
Yeah, Q1 is their softest quarter from a revenue perspective. Q2, Q4 tend to be their biggest. So Q3, so obvious --
John Doyle
Smaller. Yeah, it wasn't so -- it was good growth. It was good growth, right?
Mark McGivney
Q3 will be a little bit of a seasonal lull as well, but nothing on the order of what we saw in Q1. So the trend we saw in Q1 will moderate as we go through the year.
John Doyle
Terrific. Thank you, Mark. Thanks, Elyse. Andrew, next question, please.
Operator
Paul Newsome, Piper Sandler.
Paul Newsome
I was hoping to focus a little bit more on M&A and if you have any thoughts if the increased uncertainty will change the M&A outlook either for you or for the market?
John Doyle
Yeah. Thanks, Paul, for the question. No, I don't think so. I mean we're, again, quite active in that market. There are businesses out there, much like I've described McGriff that we've admired for a long time and we think can make us better. We think we can bring benefits to those businesses as well.
And so, it's -- when we acquire companies, we know them, right? We spend a lot of time thinking about culture, thinking about fit and thinking about the possibilities for growing together. So we have a long-term view of it. What the macro environment does to the cost of capital or for other investor interest in some of these businesses is a different thing, who knows. But we're 150 years old this year -- 154 years old -- excuse me, this year.
We've been a consolidator for 154 years, and we continue to see that as an opportunity. And it doesn't just deliver it for the shareholder. Well, of course, we want to deliver growth for all of you. As I said before, we can bring scale benefits to the middle market that can enable greater economic sustainability and greater success for clients in the middle market. And so it starts with client value and acquiring talent that can help us make that happen.
Do you have a follow-up, Paul?
Paul Newsome
I do a little bit more of a detailed question. There's a lot of wonderful commentary about the property cat reinsurance market. One question I had was about whether or not you thought the firm thought that the total reform in Florida was having an impact as well given that's a peak -- obviously a peak month for property cat insurers.
John Doyle
Yeah. Thanks, Paul. I think Dean mentioned it very briefly, but it's early, but the early signs have been positive, right? And I chose to spend a little bit of time in my prepared remarks talking about resilience and the importance to invest in resilience by communities. And in the case of Florida, they're obviously largely focused on the property cat market, those reforms.
There are important reforms in Georgia that are being rolled out now. that attack more viability issues. I mentioned the rising cost of risk, and I referenced in my prepared remarks, social inflation. Some of the insurance companies that we do business with, don't even like that label. They prefer to call it legal system abuse.
And -- but the litigation environment here in the United States is clearly attacks on our economy. And so we're working to have -- to support sensible reforms by state and at the federal government level because it continues to be a challenge. But I think the steps Florida took are helpful. We'll see ultimately where it goes. Keep an eye on what happened there in Georgia.
I think that's -- those are important steps as well. And of course, state by state, you got different challenges, different -- the legislature makeup is going to be different state to state as well. And so -- but we're investing against those issues to try to help our clients navigate what's a very expensive litigation environment here in the US. Thank you, Paul.
Andrew, with that, we're ready to wrap up. Thank you all. I want to thank you all for joining us on the call this morning. In closing, I want to thank our colleagues for their hard work and dedication.
I also want to thank our clients for their continued support. Thank you all very much, and we look forward to speaking with you all next quarter.
