Yahoo Finance

Amy Schwetz

Thank you, Scott, and good morning, everyone. Turning to Slide 8. We delivered another strong performance with first quarter revenue of $1.1 billion, adjusted operating margin of 12.8% and $0.72 of adjusted earnings per share. representing earnings growth of almost 25% versus the prior period. For the quarter, we performed better than our expectations, driven by higher sales volume on improved revenue conversion and robust FPD margins on favorable mix and accelerating 80/20 benefits.
Overall, revenues grew 5% versus last year, with organic growth of approximately 410 basis points and 330 basis points benefit from the Mogas acquisition. While foreign currency translation negatively impacted reported sales growth by about 220 basis points. Original equipment and aftermarket revenues grew both 5% versus the prior period driven by FCB.
Shifting to margins. We generated an adjusted gross margin of 33.5%, representing a 180 basis point year-over-year increase and our sixth consecutive quarter of sequential margin improvement. We believe our operational and portfolio excellence efforts position us well to continue driving margin expansion. Higher gross margins, coupled with SG&A remaining consistent as a percentage of sales led to adjusted operating margin expanding 190 basis points versus the prior period to 12.8% and represented exceptional incremental margins. Adjusted operating income was $147 million, a 24% increase versus last year. Altogether, we delivered adjusted earnings per share of $0.72 for the first quarter.
Turning to our segments, starting with FPD on slide 9. We FPD delivered exceptional bookings growth of 21% versus last year, with double-digit growth in both original equipment and aftermarket activity. Growth was driven by continued strength in nuclear activity, along with benefits in general industries and energy end markets. FPD sales growth of 2% versus last year was modest but ahead of our expectations on healthy book and ship activity and improved backlog conversion. FPD generated adjusted gross margins of 34.7% and an increase of 180 basis points versus last year, driven by favorable mix, increased productivity and strong project management.
Coupled with SG&A leverage, FPD delivered an outstanding adjusted operating margin of 17.7%, a 280 basis point increase versus the prior year period. We've made tremendous progress in FPD driving growth and expanding margins. While FPD is now ahead of 2027 adjusted operating margin targets, we still see opportunities to expand margins from here. supported by disciplined price cost actions, continued aftermarket capture, our 80-20 complexity reduction program and an enhanced approach to commercial excellence.
Turning to FCB on Slide 10. SCD delivered strong growth in the quarter with bookings growth of 10% and sales growth of 14%. The Mogas contributed 1,100 basis points of sales growth in the quarter. In FCD, aftermarket bookings increased by 19% versus last year, while original equipment bookings were up 7% and driven by general industries, energy and power end markets. FCB adjusted growth and adjusted operating margins were 30.4% and 12.2%, respectively, an increase of 120 and 110 basis points versus last year, driven by higher aftermarket margins and mix. We expect FCD margins will continue to expand as we leverage our 80-20 programming, improve execution through operational excellence and accelerate Mogas related synergies.
Turning now to cash flow on slide 11. Cash from operations was a $50 million use of cash in the quarter driven by higher temporary working capital requirements. While our receivables increased in the first quarter due to the timing of milestone billings and collections, we expect days sales outstanding to improve in the remaining periods of the year. We also paid the majority of our 2024 performance-based incentive compensation in the quarter, which impacted the accrued liabilities account.
In contrast, last year's performance-based incentive compensation was paid in the second quarter. This difference in timing will be a tailwind for cash from operations next quarter. Overall, adjusted primary working capital as a percent of sales increased to 29.8%.
Our efforts around a standardized inventory strategy resulted in improved inventory turns during the quarter, and we believe it points to further working capital opportunities and efficiencies ahead. From here, we expect significant improvement in our cash from operations and working capital efficiency with full year cash flow to adjusted net earnings of 90% or more.
Turning to capital allocation on slide 12. With the recent market volatility, we view our share price at a discount to its intrinsic value. Guided by our capital allocation philosophy, we repurchased $21 million of Flowserve shares during the first quarter and bought an additional $32 million of shares during the month of April. In total, we have repurchased $53 million of shares year-to-date at an average cost of $45 per share. We continue to believe that M&A will play an important role in our long-term strategy, and we are maintaining a critical eye towards opportunities to create value from a purchase price, synergy and balance sheet perspective.
Altogether, our capital allocation framework will continue to guide us in fulfilling our commitments like the dividend and maintaining our investment-grade rating while deploying excess cash to the highest long-term return on investment. Including share buybacks, acquisitions and prepayable debt.
Turning to our 2025 outlook on slide 13. The first quarter represents a great start to the year, and we remain focused on driving significant shareholder value in 2025. As Scott mentioned, while our end markets remain largely healthy, and we're executing better than ever, we are operating in an uncertain and evolving macro environment. As we navigate the environment, we will symbol, leverage our significant intel capabilities and continue delivering value for our customers with speed.
With this backdrop, we are reaffirming our earnings guidance communicated in February, including organic growth of 3% to 5% and adjusted earnings per share of $3.10 to $3.30, representing an 18% to 25% increase over 2024 full year adjusted EPS.
With the recent weakening of the US dollar, the sales headwind from currency translation for the balance of the year should abate modestly. So given the 220 basis point headwind in the first quarter in volatility and currency rates, we expect the full year impact to range from 100 basis point headwind to roughly neutral. Our guidance assumes tariff rates communicated to date are in place for the year. Guidance also assumes that general economic conditions and flow control demand remained relatively steady during the rest of the year.
Considering the quarterly pace of performance, we expect second quarter results to be similar or slightly better than the first quarter. We anticipate modest year-over-year top line growth and Flowserve margin expansion with solid incremental margins though incrementals are likely lower than in Q1 based on the expected mix of business in Q2.
Similar to historical seasonality, we would expect the second half of the year to represent a higher contribution to earnings than the first half, given our near record backlog of $2.9 billion, accelerating benefits from the Flowserve business system and expected synergies from the Mogas acquisitions.
In summary, we are proud of our strong start to 2025 and the confidence it provides in delivering year-over-year earnings growth in 2025. We are well positioned to navigate the macro environment given our global footprint and the actions Scott outlined. We remain focused on executing our strategy serving our customers and delivering value for our shareholders.
Operator, we will now open the call for questions. Thank you.

Question and Answer Session

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Andy Kaplowitz, Citigroup.

Andy Kaplowitz

Maybe you can -- Scott, maybe you can talk about the sustainability of bookings as you see it. Obviously, you said April look pretty good. Aftermarket was very strong. You didn't put in the book-to-bill over one. I'm just curious about how you see the second half. I think you mentioned the funnel some of your end markets. improve. So can that sort of offset any project deferrals you seem to continue to have relatively solid bookings, especially aftermarket, maybe $600 million, the new $500 million in aftermarket bookings.

Scott Rowe

Sure. Let me just start with Q1 bookings. We had a fantastic start to the year. $690 million of aftermarket bookings is the highest level I've seen since I've been here. A little -- we had a $50 million nuclear award in that number, and so that won't repeat. But we've been holding $600 million now for quite some time in aftermarket. And then I'd just say as we kind of look forward, we feel pretty good about that run rate.
And then Q1 projects, we also had a nice healthy list of projects, two nuclear awards, one in the energy space. And so nice conversion on some of those projects. And then if we go from end of Q1 to today, even as of last week, our markets continue to remain relatively healthy.
Our run rate aftermarket bookings have remained elevated. We track this now. I mean we were talking about four on a weekly basis, I'm looking at it. Amy and I are looking at it far more than ever before on a weekly basis. And even through last week, that run rate business and aftermarket remained at a very healthy level.
On the project funnel on the forward look is at a high level. power, energy and chemical growth in our forward funnel for projects is sequentially higher. And then at this point, we've seen limited project pushouts. It's hard to say that if this is kind of normal project pushouts or maybe effect of some of the macro concerns. We've seen this in some select markets like mining and in the renewables space.
But I'd say nothing like too dramatic in terms of projects coming out. And again, that forward funnel is at an elevated level. And very similar to what we saw at the end of Q4. And then I'd say within our backlog as well, we haven't seen any cancellations that would be considered out of the ordinary. And so up until today, the market looks reasonably good for us. The question is about the forward look. And I'd say if the tariff program continues and the uncertainty caused by this dynamic environment continues, then we could potentially see a slowdown in the second half of 2025.
We haven't seen this yet. I think there's a little bit of a wait and see with our customers. We're obviously staying in close contact with them having a lot of discussions with our customers. We know that they're doing scenario planning on different things. But at this point, we don't expect them to stop capital dramatically.
But I'd just say, Andy, it's really hard to call kind of what our customer is going to do in the second half of the year given the amount of uncertainty that is out in the global market. And so we deliberately didn't put the full year book-to-bill over 1.0 in the prepared remarks.
Obviously, we started Q1 at 1.07, and so we're in a really good place. And I'd say if we continue to operate how we do today, then we're going to be way above 1.0, and we feel really good with that, if the environment worsens, then there's a chance that the back half slows down.

Andy Kaplowitz

Very helpful. And then, Amy, just to the guidance on Q2, the sort of similar or modestly better EPS. Maybe you could talk a little bit more. You mentioned sort of mix could hurt incrementals a bit. Is there any sort of issue where tariffs ladder in before pricing or other countermeasures? Or sort of what's going on there? Because usually, seasonally, Q2 is a pretty decent step-up from Q1.

Amy Schwetz

Yeah. So maybe to start with the tariff impact, which we see largely as a second half issue as that works through backlog. So as we think about the second quarter, a couple of things, similar or slightly better than the first quarter. We had really strong revenue conversion on our backlog in the first quarter, which is kind of impacting the spread of revenue across those two quarters. we obviously have really strong operational momentum coming from the first quarter. And we think that 80-20 and pricing actions that we took early in the year, those increases that Scott mentioned in January, provide some positive tailwinds.
And then I think that as we look at really margin performance, we're looking at something that's pretty close to what we saw in the first quarter of the year from both a gross margin and an operating margin standpoint. But we will have some mix headwinds that are in there based on what we see in the backlog today. So I think overall, what can work well for us in the second quarter of the year. book-to-bill staying at elevated levels will help continued strong revenue conversion will help. But overall, I think we're still seeing our earnings profile be weighted towards the second half of the year.

Scott Rowe

And then Andy, I'd just add, Q1 was a really, really strong performance across the board. And so we're starting at a very elevated level as we go from Q1 to Q2 we'd be really excited to keep that or be slightly better and then prepare to deliver in the second half of the year like we normally do.

Operator

Mike Halloran, Baird.

Mike Halloran

Good morning, everyone. One of my thinking about this in terms of the footprint, the competitive footprint, the ability to push price. Two-fold question. One, how do you view your footprint relative to the peer group? It feels like everyone buys cast these fittings overseas. So I don't know if there's really much difference there other than it seems like you're in a good position, but please would love your viewpoint there? And then also, how receptive has the market been to pricing as you sit here today?

Scott Rowe

Sure. Let me just start. I'll level set everyone on the Flowserve kind of the layout. Two thirds of our business is outside of the US. And from a manufacturing perspective, about one third of that roof line is in North America. We've got good coverage in kind of that Europe and the Middle East region, and then we've got good manufacturing presence in Asia Pacific. And so I think from a manufacturing standpoint, and we put this as one of our mitigating actions, we are regionally positioned and we can typically manufacture our product in the region where our customers need it.
And so we're not getting tariffs essentially on finished goods. So we're not -- we don't ship a whole lot of stuff from Europe into the US as a finished good or a finished pumper valve. The impact for us is mostly on our supply chain.
And so I'd say from a footprint standpoint where we can manufacture, that's actually a competitive advantage. And we're still cleaning up our roofline and we know we've got some more work to do with that. But right now, it actually gives us an advantage and allows us to manufacture in a region that may have a less tariff impact than some of our peer groups.
And so I'll talk about going on the offense here at the end. But let me hit castings and forging. So castings and forgings are coming primarily from China, India, Mexico. Everybody does that. So we're in line with the peer group within Flow Control. And what we're trying to do is just find a scenario or a modeling that gives us the lowest tariff impact as we think through that.
We do a little bit of that material in the US, but it's just the capacity in the US just isn't there to support the overall business. And so I'd say we're in line with the peers of where do you go for that raw material. And then on the component level, it's motors and sensors and essentially, everyone is buying from the same place. And so I don't think there's a big competitive advantage with the supply chain.
The one thing I would say is that with the reorg design in 2023, we bolstered our supply chain and operations team we're performing better than we ever have from an operational excellence standpoint and the ability to pivot and migrate that supplier base. We've been in that work over the last two years in earnest. We've already seen some of the supply chain movements taking place and putting us in a really, really good position as we go forward.
And then on your second question on price, Mike, we do our annual price increase at the beginning of the year. That's always reasonably sticky. It's always a modest level that goes in that we start to see a little bit of that impact in Q2 and Q3. When we put that in, in the beginning of the year, we felt like that was very much a number or an amount that put us squarely above price/cost and felt very good about our ability to stay positive in that ratio.
And then with the tariff situation escalating, we went pretty aggressive in March with another price increase and did that at the product family level. And so we really focused on exactly where the tariffs were impacting, we are very clear with our customers of exactly why this price increase was going in and that we would monitor the situation globally. We did that at the base level. We didn't do it as a surcharge. And typically, we find that a little bit stickier when we go that way.
And so I'd say we don't know exactly what the stickiness is at this point. We'll start to get some data points on that in the second quarter. the feedback is most of the peer group is doing something similar. We're relatively in line. And I believe that, that will go in relatively smoothly.
The other thing on price, I just want to add, Mike, within the 80-20 framework, we've been moving prices up in our Quad 2 and Quad 3, and those are very, very healthy price increases. And so at this point, we feel relatively good about the pricing lever. We feel good about the ability to generate the price/cost ratio moving up with the aggressive price actions we've taken thus far this year.

Mike Halloran

That's super helpful. Last one for me then. Just based on the comments, you seem very confident in the ability to manage margins in the backlog. So just maybe talk about the mechanics there, whether that's hedging, price change in orders, whatever it is and how that dynamic plays out.

Scott Rowe

Yeah. So again, obviously, price is an important part of that. We're a little bit early on moving in March. And so the intention there was to get that in front of the cost impact. And then with our projects in backlog, we've done a nice job updating our terms and conditions from what we learned in the COVID crisis and supply chain crisis.
And so we've got the ability now in projects that are in our backlog to reprice that backlog given some of the macro dynamics. And so we're aggressively looking to do change orders on our cost position that got impacted by tariffs for things that are in the backlog.
And sometimes that's a little bit of a negotiation. But again, with our terms and conditions position, we feel very good about our ability to get that priced in. There is a piece of business that wouldn't be able to do price or wouldn't be able to do change orders, so our nonproject work that's somewhere in that kind of four to six-week window, and then that's where we're looking for the general price increase to overcome the tariff impact.

Operator

Deane Dray, RBC Capital Markets.

Deane Dray

Would love to continue this topic, following up on Mike's question. So on pricing, just some of the nuances you parse between aftermarket versus OE. Just kind of talk about your pricing power between the two. Switching costs for a customer, demand elasticity, at what point would they walk away? And just because it sounds like you've moved early and you have the ability to reprice backlog, which is fabulous. But just some of the nuances here, aftermarket versus OE and demand elasticity.

Scott Rowe

Sure. I think on the aftermarket side, it's obviously stickier Typically, lead times, speed of quoting making sure that we can deliver on time are far more important than price. And so I feel really good about our ability to get the price within the aftermarket. So that impacts our seals business. It's our pump parts. It's a lot of the components within the control valve that have a heavy aftermarket content there.
And so I'd say that part, we feel really good. The pricing dynamics in the backlog with our change orders for projects, we feel good about our ability to get that done. Again, a little bit of a negotiation, but I feel confident in our ability to overcome the tariff cost. And then I'd just say on the price side with the go-forward projects, that will be the one that we'll see what happens as we go forward.
And so these tariffs globally have put an inflationary pressure on all costs. It's us and our peer groups. And so as our customers start to process the new cost profile within their project spending and their project budgets, that will be a discussion.
Obviously, we're getting some pushback with our customers on wanting to share some of those inflationary costs similar to what we're doing with some of our suppliers. But I don't think there's an alternative. And so at this point, we feel that these projects continue to move forward despite the inflationary pressures with their cost profile we feel like we're in a good position to continue to win the work that we feel we're entitled to win there.

Amy Schwetz

Yeah. And I think one other thing just to point out from a global perspective, a number of our projects are coming from bookings outside of the US. And so we continue to use our global footprint to serve our customers. So with two thirds of our business outside of the US, we do view sort of a ring fence around the tariff concerns.

Deane Dray

I appreciate all the precision in these pricing, the pricing strategy and how it's being implemented. And my follow-up question is more on the M&A side. Would love an update on Mogas integration, early read and what kind of contribution you're expecting?

Scott Rowe

Sure. I'll start, and maybe Amy can jump in on a couple of points. Look, we're still excited -- we're very excited about the Mogas business. The product is highly differentiated. It puts us -- it positions us incredibly well within the severe service ball valve market.
The bookings in the quarter were a little lighter than we would want. And most of that was driven by project bookings. And so what we've seen is a bit of a slowdown in project bookings over the last two to three quarters. We have good visibility to project bookings on the forward look, and we're pretty excited about the order rate as we look in the back half of the year.
With that said, the margins are at the gross level -- gross margin levels are accretive to what we see at FCD. We like what we can do there. The aftermarket business remains incredibly strong. And so we're seeing good MRO work, good aftermarket at really high margins. And we feel like we can pull through a lot of the Mogas product on the back of the Flowserve network and certainly our QRC network.
From an integration standpoint, it's progressing ahead. In fact, we're ahead of pace in terms of some of the cost-out actions that we identified early on, and we feel confident in our ability to deliver our synergy target number as well as being accretive to earnings in the first year.

Amy Schwetz

Yeah. And the only other thing that I'll point out to what Scott added on synergies is just the acceleration of those synergies and getting up to run rate levels is part of the first half back half story for us from an earnings perspective. And so we're seeing that play out with Mogas being accretive to earnings in the first quarter, and we can continue to think that, that will accelerate over the course of 2025.

Operator

Nathan Jones, Stifel.

Nathan Jones

I guess, starting off with a question on the visibility into the project pipeline. I think typically, when you're booking project orders, those projects are fairly advanced. And so if you were to see a drop off in project orders. it probably does happen in the first quarter, it doesn't happen in the second quarter. It might not even happen in the third quarter of this year, but maybe a bit further out. Do you guys have visibility to those projects that might turn into orders for Flowserve of 6, 12, 18 months ahead? And is that where you would see project pushouts if they were to occur?

Scott Rowe

Yeah. I think it's a really good point. And again, I want to reemphasize what Amy said, a lot of our projects are outside of the US, and we're well positioned to manufacture that work with our global footprint and manufacturing presence outside the US.
But to your point on timing, it's a really good one. And so when we think about project visibility in the second quarter and even into the third quarter. A lot of those projects have already received FID and they're well, well down the line of engineering, procurement and construction. And so unwinding that project, pausing that project, we really don't ever see that. Even in the COVID downturn, you don't see a whole lot of that.
And so our funnel for kind of Q2 and Q3 would remain kind of as is. And obviously, we're competing for that work and we'll put our best foot forward. But we're very confident in that visibility in moving those projects forward.
The FID decisions that could be made in the second quarter or potentially delayed given some of the global environment would impact our bookings in 2026 and maybe even in 2027. But again, we haven't seen that at this point. We typically will get kind of a one year out visibility for these large projects. We'll get a little bit on the commentary from some of our larger customers. They'll talk about it in earnings calls or investor presentations, but it's difficult for us to see that type of visibility beyond kind of a 1 year.
Now the one market that is a little bit different would be nuclear. We get very, very long visibility into our nuclear orders. We'll typically start to track those projects two years, maybe two and a half years before we would get the order. And because of it's such a long nature type. And I'm talking about really about nuclear power generation, so big traditional nuclear power plants.
So we'll get strong visibility for up to two years there. That funnel is still incredibly robust, and we still feel that we're going to continue to have outsized nuclear bookings as we go forward. And those obviously are dependent on governments and energy security, and I really don't see those trends changing as we go forward.

Amy Schwetz

Yeah. And the other thing that I just comment on the nuclear funnel, Nathan, which is is comforting in uncertain times is we've had 3 quarters in a row over $100 million of nuclear bookings. And that does impact the amount of our backlog that ships within the next 12 months. So it starts to provide us visibility into revenue, not just in the current year, but in upcoming years. And I think particularly environments -- in environments like this, it's a nice piece of business to have.

Nathan Jones

Excellent. I guess second question on -- I guess this is on tariffs. You said $90 million to $100 million of gross unmitigated impact. Can you talk about what you intend to offset with price and what you intend to offset with other supply chain initiatives or manufacturing initiatives?

Scott Rowe

Sure. Yeah. I'll just let me make sure folks understand. So it's $90 million to $100 million of gross tariff impact that's unmitigated, and that's the annualized number. In our headquarters here that we -- we watch very carefully because that number has changed a lot over the last month and a half.
And then what we do is also track the activities toward mitigating that. And so obviously, price is a big lever there. We think prices could mitigate potentially half of that. And then we're really deliberately working through those supply chain actions to make sure that we're repositioning the supply chain to the lowest tariff impacted country or potentially moving that into the region where there is no tariff impact.
And then secondly is the repositioning of the manufacturing that I talked about earlier, we feel like with our vast manufacturing network, we've got a bit of a competitive advantage to move things around the world and reposition them where we need to. And so I think that's actually an opportunity in this dynamic time to win a little bit more work and take some market share given our presence in the region.
And then finally, I would just say, I want to touch on 80-20 and while it might not be obvious that, that would be a help here. Any time you're reducing the complexity in your portfolio, it allows us to focus on the areas that make the biggest impact. And so when we talk about moving supply chain or repositioning some of that assembly, we're really talking about our Quad 1 products.
And now that's dramatically a much shorter list dramatically less complexity than what we've had in the past, and it allows us to move with speed as we're doing some of this repositioning. So we feel very good about our ability to mitigate. Obviously, we're leveraging trade agreements as well. And so there's been a lot of work on just making sure that all of our coding is in the right place and making sure that we can capitalize on those trade agreements.
And so we feel that the combination of efforts does allow us to fully mitigate the impact. We think the timing could be a little bit mismatched as we work through the quarters. But overall, for the full year of 2025 -- and we said this in the prepared remarks, we feel like we can mitigate the full $90 million to $100 million.

Amy Schwetz

And Nathan, just to double down on one point with core or 80-20 and other sort of benefits from the way we run the business through the Flowserve business system we see playing out over the year. When we reiterated guidance, we're reiterating our margin expansion as well for the full year. And so we said in February, 100 basis points of operating margin expansion year-over-year. Our Q1 operating margin performance was actually 100 basis points better our full year 2024 operating margin performance. So we feel like we've got a really strong start to the year from that perspective.
Now what I will say is as we look at tariffs, there is a bit of a disparity in terms of our segments that are impacted. So a higher proportion of our tariff exposure is actually on the flow control side of the business, the valve side of the business than on as we look at margin expansion playing out over the course of the year, we may see valves being slightly more pressured than pumps in this area.

Nathan Jones

And just a quick clarification. The timing being a bit mismatched would imply that there's a bit of margin pressure in the second quarter and a bit less in second half.

Amy Schwetz

I would consider the margin pressure to be more between the third and fourth quarters. So I think second quarter, as we look at our backlog, a lot of that is going to be fulfilled with materials that are in inventory already. And so really, the second half, I think, is where we see more pressure coming in and that price mismatch probably occurring more between the third and fourth quarters.

Operator

Andrew Obin, Bank of America.

David Ridley Lane

This is David Ridley Lane on for Andrew Obin. Last quarter, you said that inventory positions at your distributors were at pretty normal levels. Wondering if you saw any prebuy activity from your distributors maybe ahead of the March price actions.

Scott Rowe

Sure. We'll talk about our distributors, and these would be the stocking distributors that are primarily in the valve business, but we have a little bit of this in pumps and our mechanical seals. They have been under a lot of pressure on inventory management over the last one and a half years. And so we really didn't see a whole lot of prebuying. We know there is a little bit of it with a few of our distributors but really nothing material and no big boost to kind of the February or March bookings levels through that distribution channel.

David Ridley Lane

Understood. And then do you see any need to add to your capacity as you are seeing these elevated nuclear orders continue? And maybe would you need to add to capacity on some of the more specialized LNG or power generation projects, which are?

Scott Rowe

Sure. We're blessed and cursed with a large roof line. And so at this point, we don't see any scenario where we need to add incremental roofline. In fact, we're continuing to take roofline out of the global network. With that said, there are a lot of things that we can do to expand capacity within the sites that we have. And so obviously, we've got dedicated nuclear facilities to support the rigid quality plans that are required in the nuclear product space. And in those sites, we are looking to expand that capacity.
But we can do that with minimal investment. It's more through process change and staffing effectively. And a lot of that work really relies more on the front end with your project management and your engineering. And so we've got a pretty good view of forward product demand. We'll ensure that we can continue to increase capacity more through our operational excellence program as part of the Flowserve business system than needing to drive incremental roofline or add facilities into the network.

Operator

Joe Giordano, TD Cowen.

Joe Giordano

So maybe I'll start. The 3D bookings, obviously, have a lot of momentum here. How do you square that with like some of the actions taken from a policy standpoint. I think recently, DOE is same like cutting something like $10 billion in funding for clean energy projects spanning carbon capture and hydrogen and some of the stuff that you've been doing very well and at customers that you serve. So how do you see that interplay?

Scott Rowe

Sure. Those would all fall in our decarbonization line. We continue to see a lot of activity around decarbonization. I would say, it's changing. The mix is changing a bit in terms of less focus on kind of the things that were further out like a green hydrogen. But we're seeing continued support for carbon capture.
And obviously, Europe has been a big rig proponent of the energy transition type bookings or the decarbonization type bookings. But the US activity hasn't changed either. And so I think companies are pretty focused on reducing their carbon footprint and ensuring that their assets are running at a reasonably clean type level.
And so we haven't seen any slowdown in our forward funnel there. We have seen some projects come off the list that were never economical or never were going to make a whole lot of sense. So I'd say even for US decarbonization activity, we still think that moves forward.
I'd just say we also have LNG within our decarbonization lane. And obviously, the rhetoric in the United States very, very promotional around natural gas and around the LNG export side. And so we feel pretty good about the visibility to LNG projects globally, but certainly kind of a resurgence in the US LNG activity.

Joe Giordano

And then the second question on -- just I want to understand what's embedded in the guidance from a macro standpoint. I know the slide deck says you're assuming that kind of general economic conditions stay largely the same.
But at the same time, I guess, you're raising prices here. It seems like you built in somewhat of a contingency on volumes going down as a result of price because the organic growth is the same despite the higher price component. So like -- is it fair to say that if macro conditions really do stay the same and you're booking like [1.1], [1.2], like under normal circumstances you'd probably be raising now?

Amy Schwetz

So I think we talked a lot about our guidance range internally before today. And I'd start with saying that our strong execution in the first quarter gives us a little bit -- a lot of confidence in our ability to perform over the course of the full year.
So we factored into our guidance is what we know today. So tariff climate as it is today, inflation is what we know today and demand signals that we're seeing through kind of the last several weeks. We also considered our risks and opportunities, and we feel like we have a very clear path or I should say, actually pass to delivering on our original guidance. And it might help to kind of frame this within the context of what the low end of the range and what the high end of the range might look like.
So if we were to deliver at the low end of our range, which still, by the way, provides 18% earnings growth year-over-year for Flowserve, that would include some mismatch in tariff impact and mitigating actions over the course of the year and it might include some level of demand destruction in the back half of the year.
Delivering at the high end of the range means that we execute well on our mitigation actions. And we continued the strong book-to-bill business that we've seen in the first quarter of the year and into April, and we see continued momentum under the Flowserve business system with both operational excellence and the 80-20 activities.
I think either way, we're going to see margin expansion year-over-year. And I would say the other wildcard out there is certainly around FX. The current environment. And when I say current, I'll say, the last week has been very favorable. Obviously, that's been volatile as well. But the US dollar remaining at relatively weak levels in comparison to the first quarter could be a tailwind as well.

Scott Rowe

Yeah. So just to reiterate what Amy said, this is -- we put the guidance out there, given everything that we know today, Obviously, this is a very dynamic environment. But right now, we feel very confident that we can deliver. And as a reminder, that guidance for 2025 is 18% higher on the low end and 25% higher on the high end, which would be outstanding performance in any operating environment. And so we'll monitor the next 90 days here, and we'll get a chance to talk about guidance at the end of our second quarter. And if things change, we'll certainly update the guidance to reflect those changes.

Operator

Saree Boroditsky, Jefferies.

Unidentified Participant

This is James on for Saree. I wanted to understand 1Q and 2Q dynamic a little bit more here. So you talked about strong backlog conversion in the quarter, that is kind of impacting the like spread between 1Q and 2Q. So can you talk about what drove the strong conversion? I think you talked about there wasn't really a prebuy. So I just wanted to understand why there was such a strong conversion in backlog.

Amy Schwetz

Sure. So it really -- the conversion in backlog was really around things that were already in backlog entering the year in our more engineered business. So just continuing to well from an operational excellence perspective, hitting milestones, delivering kind of what we say we're going to do for our customers or in some cases, even overdelivering in those instances. And I think that this is really just an indication that operational excellence is in a really good place within our platforms, and that's really the conversion that we saw in the first quarter.

Unidentified Participant

Got it. And I guess I wanted to touch on the margin side a little bit more. So I think -- going into the year, I think you were expecting FCD to show little bit better margin expansion compared to FPD, but it seems like FPD can perform better in the quarter. So how should we think about the margin expansion in each segment?

Amy Schwetz

Sure. So FPD has been on a really great run. The results that we posted in the first quarter of this year, the best that we've seen since that segment has been in existence as it is today. So we really can't say enough about the performance from that segment. And we think there's still more gas in the tank there.
So we're just starting to see the benefits of 80-20 come through the system there. They continue to focus on operating and operational excellence under the Flowserve Business System and delivering on the benefits of that as well. They've also seen a strong mix benefit in the numbers with really the focus on growing the aftermarket and investing in the right type of engineer to order projects.
And so we think there's still more room above the levels that we saw in Q1. And we're at our long-term target levels for 2027, we're going to continue to try and surpass those and determine what we think is the art of the possible in terms of margin performance in FPD.
Turning to FCD. We have made important structural changes within FCD to bring our margins up. And under normal circumstances, we do or we would see FCD margins expanding more than FPD in the current year. And just to kind of outline what those are. It's really around footprint decisions that were made and executed in 2024. It's around the Mogas acquisition, which already is accretive at the gross margin level. And it's about really selective bidding in margins and backlog that we saw coming into 2025.
The headwinds that we face are what I referenced in one of the earlier questions, which is just that the tariff impact and exposure is greater on the FCD side of the business. That's in part because they've done a nice job shifting their supply chain to low-cost countries and also manufacture more in low-cost countries in certain instances than FPD. And so as we work our way through the course of 2025, the risk around the mismatch of timing between mitigating actions, and our order delivery is greater on that side of the business.
And then I want to finish what's a long answer to a simple question by saying, just to reiterate, we feel very good about overall margin expansion for Flowserve of 100 basis points or better in 2025, and we're going to continue to deliver that, knowing that is incredibly important to our investors.

Operator

And that does conclude the question-and-answer session. I'll now turn the call back over to Brian Ezzell for any additional or closing remarks.

Brian Ezzell

Great. Thank you to everyone for joining the call today. We look forward to seeing many of you at upcoming conferences and then again, when we report Q2 earnings. If you have any questions following the call, please reach out to the Investor Relations team will be happy to connect.
And with that, we appreciate the time. Have a great day.

Operator

Thank you. That does conclude today's conference. We do thank you for your participation. Have an excellent day.