Yahoo Finance

Brian West

Thanks, Kelly, and good morning, everyone. Let's start with the total company financial performance for the quarter. Revenue was $19.5 billion, up 18%, primarily driven by higher commercial delivery volume. The core loss per share of $0.49 was a significant improvement compared to last year, driven by higher commercial deliveries and improved operational performance across the business.
Free cash flow was a usage of $2.3 billion in the quarter, reflecting higher commercial deliveries and a working capital usage that improved compared to both the prior year and quarter. Our free cash flow was better than expectations shared last month driven by volume and favorable working capital timing. These financial results reflect only tariffs enacted as of March 31, which was not material.
Turning to the next page, I'll cover BCA. BCA delivered 130 airplanes in the quarter. Revenue was $8.1 billion, and operating margin was minus 6.6%, primarily reflecting higher 737 and 777 deliveries as well as lower period costs.
BCA booked 221 net orders in the quarter, 777-9s and 20 787-10 airplanes for Korean Air and 50 737-8 airplanes for BOCA. Backlog in the quarter ended at $460 billion, which was up more than $25 billion sequentially. This includes more than 5,600 airplanes that translate to over seven years of production. And importantly, the 737 and 787 are sold for into the next decade. Now I'll give more color on the key programs.
The 737 program delivered 105 airplanes in the quarter, including 33 in March. On production, the factory gradually increased rate during the quarter and monthly production was in the low 30s in March. Importantly, the operational KPIs continue to progress, and we still expect to be in a position to go to 38 per month over the next few months.
Spirit continues to improve the quality and flow of fuselages, which sets us up well for the reintegration and the deal is expected to close around midyear. More broadly on the master schedule, we continue to make adjustments as needed and manage supplier by supplier based on inventory levels.
Over the past year, our buffer inventory has grown to promote stability across our production system. As production stabilizes and rates increase over time, we plan to deliberately return buffer inventory to more normal levels. Today, we have about 30 737-8s built prior to 2023, which is down 25 from year-end and includes 25 airplanes for customers in China.
We still expect to complete the rework on these airplanes and shut down the shadow factory by midyear. On the 7 and 10, inventory levels were stable at approximately 35 airplanes and certification timelines are unchanged.
On the 787, we delivered 13 airplanes in the quarter generally in line with expectations outlined on our last earnings call. The program continues to stabilize production at five per month in the quarter, and we remain intent on demonstrating stability in the production system and supply chain prior to making the next rate increase to seven over the next few months.
Today, we have about 20 airplanes in inventory built prior to 2023 that required rework, down five from year-end. 4 of these 20 are for customers in China. Importantly, we finished the rework and shut down the shadow factory in the quarter and expected to deliver about half of the remaining airplanes this year.
Finally, on the 777X, the program took another important step in its certification timeline as it received approval from the FAA to expand flight testing activities. We'll continue to follow the lead of the FAA as we progress through the certification process and still expect first delivery in 2026.
777X inventory was up approximately $800 million in the quarter and will continue to grow as we move towards entering service as we've previously shared. Moving on to the next page, in BDS. BDS booked $4 billion in orders during the quarter, and the backlog ended at $62 billion.
Importantly, in the quarter, BDS was selected by the US Air Force to design, build and deliver its next-generation fighter aircraft, the F-47. This order was not included in our first quarter backlog, pending the completion of the source selection and evaluation review process.
Revenue was $6.3 billion, down 9% on planned lower volume, including the impact from commercial derivatives associated with the production restart. BDS delivered 26 aircraft in the quarter. Operating margin was plus 2.5%, up 30 basis points compared to last year and reflected stabilizing operational performance in the quarter.
We made important progress in 1Q and the game plan is to get BDS back to high single-digit margins over time. Our core business remains solid, representing approximately 60% of our revenue and performing in the mid-to high single-digit margin range. The demand for these products remains very strong supported by the threat environment confronting our nation and our allies.
The roughly 25% of the portfolio is primarily comprised of fighter and satellite programs, operational performance improved in the quarter, which drove favorable margin trends. Lastly, on our fixed price development programs that represent the remaining 15% of revenue, we continue to work to stabilize and mature these programs.
This quarter's results reflected stabilizing operational performance, and we remain focused on retiring risk each quarter and ultimately delivering these mission-critical capabilities to our customers. During the quarter, the MQ-25 program successfully transported the first engineering development model aircraft to the new production facility in Illinois, where it began final assembly, the last production step before ground and flight testing begin later this year.
On the T-7A, we achieved the first two EMD performance milestones outlined in the MOA that was finalized with the US Air Force in January. This continues to be an important example of how we are working with our customers to find better overall outcomes for both parties.
Overall, the defense portfolio is well positioned for the future and we still expect the business to return to historical performance levels as we continue to stabilize production, execute our development programs and transition to new contracts with tighter underwriting standards.
Moving on to the next page, in BGS. BGS continued to perform well, delivering very strong financial results in the quarter. The business received $5 billion in orders and the backlog ended at $22 billion. Revenue was $5.1 billion, stable year-over-year. Operating margin was 18.6% in the quarter, up 40 basis points compared to last year on favorable performance and mix with both our commercial and government businesses delivering double-digit margins.
In the quarter, BGS delivered the 100th 767-300 Boeing converted freighter to SF Airlines and received a modification contract from the US Air Force to integrate electronic warfare systems for the F-15 Eagle. It remains a terrific long-term franchise focused on profitable, capital-efficient service offerings and continues to execute very well.
Turning to the next page, I'll cover cash and debt. Cash and marketable securities ended at $23.7 billion, primarily reflecting the free cash flow usage in the quarter. Debt balance ended at $53.6 billion, down $300 million due to the paydown of maturing debt and leaving $550 million of debt maturities remaining in the year.
The company maintains access to $10 billion of revolving credit facilities, all of which remain undrawn. We remain committed to managing the balance sheet in a prudent manner with two main objectives: first, prioritize the investment-grade rating; and second, allow the factories supply chain to stabilize. As you saw yesterday, we entered into an agreement to sell portions of our digital aviation solutions business for $10.55 billion, which is an important component of our strategy to focus on our core businesses and strengthen the balance sheet.
Stepping back, let me provide some additional context on the macro backdrop before getting into the free cash flow outlook. We continue to closely monitor recent policy developments and believe that the administration understands the aerospace industry's importance to our economy broadly and US manufacturing jobs specifically and is focused on keeping our US industrial base globally competitive for the long term.
Given our position as a significant US exporter, free trade policy across commercial aerospace remains very important to us. As noted recently on the supply side, roughly 80% of our annual commercial supply chain spend goes directly to US based suppliers, and we'll work closely with all our suppliers to ensure continuity of supply and pursue options to mitigate cost pressures.
Conversely, on the demand side, about 70% of our commercial deliveries this year are planned for customers outside the US. And importantly, the company has a large and diverse backlog of over $0.5 trillion with our key commercial programs sold out into the next decade.
Specifically on China, it represents approximately 10% of our commercial backlog, and if we need to redirect supply to more stable demand, a strong market backdrop across the rest of the world still supports our planned production rate increases. Regarding free cash flow.
We set a conservative plan for the year and had a strong start operationally, which we believe puts us in a position to largely offset any potential cash flow impact of China deliveries this year as well as higher expected input costs due to tariffs. Regarding deliveries, our plan for the rest of the year was to deliver roughly 50 airplanes to customers in China.
There is strong demand for these airplanes, and we are actively assessing options should we need to redirect the 41 China airplanes that are already built or currently in production. We will continue to monitor the demand situation and if tariff-related impacts expand beyond China, we would expect to see additional pressure.
Broadly, the markets we serve continue to be significant, and our backlog of more than $0.5 trillion demonstrates the strength of our core product portfolio. Long term, these fundamentals underpin our confidence in managing the business with a long-term view built on safety, quality and delivering for our customers.
And before I open it up for questions, I too would like to thank Matt Welch for his partnership over almost four years, and we all knew they weren't easy four years. He's a terrific Boeing leader and we wish him all the best in his new promotion, and we welcome Eric Hill in his IR role.
With that, I'll open up for questions.

Question and Answer Session

Operator

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions)
Doug Harned, Bernstein.

Douglas Harned

Good morning. Thank you. Kelly, if we go back to the first Trump administration, negotiations on subsidies across the Atlantic led effectively to a 0 tariff environment for aviation. And when you look at the recent tariffs announced and under consideration, I mean, we would say they do nothing positive for the industry.
I expect if Guillaume Faury were on this call, the two of you would probably be in violent agreement on this. But you commented earlier that the administration understands the importance of the industry, but can you describe how you and others are interacting with Washington to get around, get out of this tariff environment and what are you hearing back? What's your sense on how this might evolve in the US and even in Europe and China based on your interactions there?

Kelly Ortberg

Yeah, Doug, well, obviously, it's an important topic right now and very dynamic topic. I don't think a day goes by where we aren't engaged with someone in the administration including cabinet secretaries and up to POTUS himself.
So this is a dynamic environment. As you point out, we've had the luxury of operating for decades, actually since the 1979 civil aircraft aviation agreement on large aircraft in a tariff-free environment. So we're spending a lot of time making sure the administration understands the implications of either short-term or long-term tariffs on not just our company, but the overall aviation industry here in the US.
I would just tell you that they understand, they know this is extremely important to our trade, to the trade balance. Aircraft are such a significant part of our trade surplus. And if we see markets closing, that's going to be a big challenge for us.
So look, I'm very hopeful that we get to some negotiated agreements here and that we can move forward. Right now, China is our only problem and as we said in the prepared remarks, we're going to work our tail off to make sure the China issue doesn't implicate our recovery and particularly our or stability in our production system.
So we'll deal with that. Customers are calling, asking for additional airplanes. So this is really going to be just a short-term challenge for us to either have China reverse course and take the airplanes or get us in a position to remarket those airplanes. And as you know, to remarket them, we'll have to do some things like painting them and things like that. But having said that, look, I can't predict where this is going to go.
I don't know any better than anybody reporting. We do hear signs that indicate that negotiated settlements are opportunities for that. I just don't know the timing. And so again, we're going to take the actions we need to make sure if this takes a while, we don't get into a situation where it impacts our recovery. The one thing that we have to watch is to make sure we don't see more countries in a similar boat as where we are with China.
We're watching the EU. You made the comment on our competitor. And I think you -- I would agree with you wholeheartedly that both Guillaume and I would welcome a non-tariff environment for both of us. This isn't good for either company to be in this situation or the industry. So hey, we're working through it.
I can't tell you the timing of when this is going to all get resolved, but I can't tell you we're going to take proactive action and manage our way through it.

Douglas Harned

Very good. Thank you.

Operator

Myles Walton, Wolfe Research.

Myles Walton

Thanks. Good morning and congrats on the move, Matt. You survived a lot. So Brian, I think in January, you were expecting deliveries in the 37 in the low 400s and maybe 80 or so on the 787, does that still -- that framework still holds with the 50 aircraft from China not going to China specifically, as Kelly mentioned.

Brian West

Thanks, Myles. On the 37, yes, we still think that's the right ballpark of 400. You had a nice strong start to the year operationally and that should allow us to offset most of any delivery pressure that would come from the 25 airplanes already built in inventory and around six that are in production, airplanes that we plan to deliver this year.
And for the second quarter specifically, we expect to deliver in the high 20s for April and the quarter should be more or less in line with 1Q ex China, which is in the low to mid-90s. On the 87, you're also in the right ballpark.
We also are having a nice start to the year, and we expect to ramp to seven per month in the next few months and China would only be a handful of airplanes impacted. So we like the ballpark that you mentioned. And for 2Q, we've already delivered five so far in April, and we expect 2Q to be a bit higher than where we were in 4Q '24 delivery.
So things are going pretty well. I think what's really important is any delivery timing won't disrupt our production rate increases on these programs and we're making really good progress operationally, and we're tracking to achieve the right milestones that Kelly mentioned in both programs in the coming months.

Myles Walton

All right, thank you.

Operator

Seth Seifman, JPMorgan.

Kelly Ortberg

Hey.

Seth Seifman

Thanks very much, and good morning, everyone, and congratulations, Matt. Just wanted to ask a follow-up question on tariffs on the cost side. I guess if there's anything you could say to kind of size if we're thinking about the two impacts being kind of the China impact and the cost impact, maybe kind of sizing potentially those two impacts?
And then talking about the drawback process on the cost side, do you need to maybe manage the supply chain a little bit on the cost side, if there are suppliers down in the chain who can handle this as well as some of the larger and more well-capitalized suppliers. And also how you deal with -- I gather you're going to get a push from certain suppliers to kind of push through tariffs that they have with different surcharges and anything you can say about that process?

Kelly Ortberg

Yeah, Seth, let me start with kind of the process, and then I'll let Brian kind of quantify it. So as you point out, we do have the duty drawback opportunity. And as you know, about 80% of our airplanes go outside or delivered outside of the US. So we have the opportunity for those duties that we pay, those tariffs that we pay to recover that when we deliver the aircraft.
Now it creates a little bit of a cash flow timing issue that we'll have to work through. We are actively working as well with the supply chain because they don't have that opportunity. Their point of deliveries to us and that we, in turn, deliver the product outside of the US. So we are working to see if we can't, in effect, allow them to piggyback on our duty drawback. And that requires accounting processes to make sure we can track things.
And so we're working that right now. We do have some suppliers who indicated they're going to have some pricing increases associated with that. But it's not overly material, and we're working through that. The thing I'm really trying to make sure we're focused on is making sure that an argument over a 10% tariff who's going to pay doesn't turn into a continuity of supply issue.
So we really need to make sure that people are buying and bringing in the parts that we're going to need, and then we'll work through the financial implications. I'll let Brian kind of quantify that for you.

Brian West

Yeah, sure. So I think I'll start with the supply chain input costs, and then I'll get to the China piece. On the supply chain side, the net annual impact of higher tariffs on our input costs is manageable and within our plan, it's less than $500 million annually. And here's how to think about some of the pieces in addition to what Kelly described. We have elevated inventory levels that are all pre-tariff.
Aluminum and steel are typically 1% to 2% of the average cost of the airplane, which is virtually all US sourced. And with higher inventory levels and hedging strategies, that 1% to 2% is even lower in the current environment.
We do [ballify] on behalf of our supply chain partners, and those could be subject to some price increases as tariffs look higher, that we can't pass along, but that's a very small amount of money, nothing to worry about. As Kelly said, we do have this duty drawback opportunity to get you to that net a few hundred million dollars.
And I would point out that we have a global trade and supply chain team that have decades of experience with tariffs and duty recovery. And when you're one of the world's biggest exporters, we really have a good handle on this. So we feel confident in some of the ways that we've been describing this, I'd also say that keep in mind that over time, any input-related costs will work its way through to price escalators.
So it should mostly neutralize over time. And then in addition to what Kelly said about the suppliers, as you know, many are on fixed price life of program contracts where the import of record does pay the tariff. And as Kelly said, we're doing what we can to help them through this situation.
As it pertains to China specifically, we talk about 50 or so airplanes that's -- it could be north of $1 billion. But as I said, it's all contemplated within a conservative plan we put together.

Seth Seifman

Great. Thank you.

Operator

Scott Deuschle, Deutsche Bank.

Scott Deuschle

Hey, good morning, Brian. On the last call, you seem to reference that the free cash flow usage for the year will be somewhere in the $4 billion to $5 billion range. I guess can you give an update on how you're thinking about that specific range as well as some further characterization of the free cash flow cadence as we move through the year? Thank you.

Brian West

Sure, thanks, Scott. Let me start with the second quarter. So we expect the second quarter to be roughly in line with the first quarter usage. And as we've said, we expect the second half free cash flow to turn positive and then accelerate as we exit the year, driven by a few really important levers. The 737 production ramped to 38 per month and even potentially higher as we exit the year.
Higher 737 delivery volume. We've got the 787 production ramp to seven per month and also potentially higher as we exit the year. We have the higher 787 delivery volume, and we have customer receipts that will be favorable, and those are offset by a couple of things: higher investment levels, including the 777X and the potential impact of both China and this net impact from higher input costs from tariffs that we've discussed.
So in terms of the range that you mentioned, we're not going to adjust that full year range right now. We're good with where it's at. We had a really good start to the year. We need to execute on the production rate increases and we need more clarity on China and tariffs more broadly. So give us a little bit of time to see how things play out. The good news is that as Kelly said, we deliberately built the year to account for some unknowns. We're still comfortable with the plan that we've outlined.

Scott Deuschle

Appreciate it. Thank you.

Operator

Sheila Kahyaoglu, Jefferies.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

Good morning, Kelly, Brian, and thank you Matt so much. So maybe just on that last thought, assuming the skyline is largely intact outside of China, and there's no demand impact with tariffs, how are we thinking that production ramps outside 2025 with the 37 and the 87 rates? And how you're watching the biggest risks in the supply chain and the master schedule and how that correlates to cash flow expectations as you continue to benefit from volume ramps, but also on-time deliveries?

Kelly Ortberg

See, let me take the demand side, and now I'll let Brian comment. So we don't see any change in the overall demand here. Our backlog is well over $0.5 trillion. It's everybody wants the aircraft. So we're going to work through this China situation, maybe have to redeploy some aircraft, but we don't see any pullback whatsoever in demand for the aircraft.
So our rate increase plan is remains unchanged. We'll go to 38 a month here. We'll get to the stability. And then our first rate increase will be from 38 to 42. And then we'll do five per month increments after that. So 42 to 47, 47 to 52. Those rate increases would be no earlier than probably six months in between. But again, it depends on -- each one will require that we have stable KPIs.
And the more you move up the rate, the more difficult it is to make sure you maintain stable KPIs. So if we go to one of those rates and we need to stay there for a little longer to be mature, that's what we'll do. But I don't see any change in our long-term rate plans.
All the KPIs on 787 right now are all green, look good. So we'll make this next rate increase in the coming months on 787 and then there are future opportunities there. As you know, we've invested additional capital, $1 billion here in our Charleston facility. That's where we are today to expand our production capacity here.
So we definitely want to get the 87 back up to double-digit production rates. And none of what we're seeing right now is not going to stop those plans.

Brian West

And on the supply chain side, as I mentioned, we have a lot of inventory, enough inventory that is there for us to achieve the rates that Kelly is mentioning. And we've got really good alignment with our key suppliers, fuselages, engines, everything looks pretty good.
Yes, we have to get through some discrete moments around this tariffs and ensuring the continuity of delivery, which we'll work through, as Kelly mentioned. But as we look a little further out, good alignment, plenty of inventory. We feel pretty confident about the supply chains side of it.

Sheila Kahyaoglu

Thank you.

Operator

Scott Mikus, Melius Research.

Scott Mikus

Good morning.

Kelly Ortberg

Hey Scott.

Scott Mikus

Kelly, congrats on the F-47 win. I have a quick question there. There was a comment from the administration about the EMD phase being cost-plus, but there were some competitively priced options for LRIP. So I'm just wondering, are those options fixed price? Do they have inflation escalators built into them?
How should we be thinking about the risk from those options?

Kelly Ortberg

Yeah, hey Scott. On the F-47, we're not at liberty to disclose anything relative to the contract structure beyond what the Air Force has said. So the only thing I can say is what they've read, what you've read there is the extent of our disclosure. Clearly we haven't come off our strategy of ensuring we're entering into the appropriate.
A contract type for the appropriate type of work. So I wouldn't worry that we've signed up to undo risk like we, like we've done in some of our past fixed price programs, but that's about all I can say on that right now.

Scott Mikus

Alright, thanks for taking the question.

Operator

David Strauss, Barclays.

David Strauss

Good morning.

Kelly Ortberg

Hey David.

David Strauss

Hey Kelly. Could you maybe dig in a little bit more on the status of the six KPIs, specifically the progress you're seeing there, I guess, maybe three months ago, both on the MAX and the 787, I think you had highlighted there was one on the 787 that was kind of out of line a little bit. If you could just touch on that. And then how you've gone about mitigating risk around the Jenkintown, the fire there? And how do you feel like how you've got that kind of captured in the guidance as well? Thanks.

Kelly Ortberg

Okay. Look, on the KPIs, as I mentioned, on 787, when we talked at the last earnings call, we had one of the KPIs that was below threshold, and that was in final ticketing the number of snags the final ticketing. That's all gone green. So we're looking really good that -- the 87 team has done a really, really nice job of focusing on that.
We are still burning down some rework associated with pre-strike level inventory aircraft. We're getting close to that -- I switched to 737 now. And so we still have a little bit of work on one KPI, and that's on rework relative to the 737 MAX.
However, it's coming down the rework is coming down per our plan. So I feel pretty good that as we continue to go through from the low 30s to 38, and we get the cleaner airplanes flowing through the factory that will actually be green on all of our metrics. So look, as I sit here right now, things really look good.
We had as I said in my prepared remarks, we had Secretary Duffy and the acting administrator, Chris Rocheleau here, in Seattle. They spent time out the floor, talking to FAA people, talking to our machines and things look pretty good.
I think we're really aligned on what we need to do to get to the rate increases. So far, so good. We can't claim victory. We got to get to 38 and show stable performance there. But our plan seems to be working, and we'll make any adjustments we need to.
Regarding the SPS Fire, the team has done a very, very nice job of reacting and jumping all over that issue. And it's a combination of finding alternate source, requalifying finding inventory and getting it in the right place. And it's not just us, as you know, it's some of our major suppliers as well who this impact.
I think we're going to be able to scramble our way through this. I don't think we'll be at the inventory levels we want, but I don't see right now that any aircraft program is going to be held up over these fasteners. So the team, every time I meet with them, they've burned down the open issues to fewer and fewer. And it looks like we're going to be able to manage our way through this.
Now it's going to take a while to get this capacity back into the system. So we're going to just have to stay diligent as we manage this and particularly as we ramp up in rates.

Operator

Noah Poponak, Goldman Sachs

Noah Poponak

Hey, good morning, everyone.

Kelly Ortberg

Hi, Noah.

Noah Poponak

Kelly, how did you reduce traveled work by 50% in a few months? And how did you have a positive defense margin despite the tanker news in the quarter? And really, the bigger picture question there is, were some of these improvements inevitable with time? Or how much have you changed specifically since you've come on board with the blocking and tackling of the operating performance of the business.
You've laid out how you're going to turn the battleship, but curious if you could talk about the shorter-term simpler blocking and tackling improvements you've made and I thought maybe those would be two that would be helpful to hear more about.

Kelly Ortberg

Yeah, so let me address the traveled work first, Noah. First of all, I don't build any airplanes. So the team is doing a great job. It's not me. That's what the team is doing. And we've put in a major new process in the way we're building the aircraft.
For any -- before we move the aircraft, and you know these are moving lines. So before we move the aircraft, we now have what we call a travel-ready process. And what that requires that any work not done on station, any traveled work has to be evaluated in a risk -- safety risk assessments done against that.
And if it induces safety risk like we saw with the door blow out, we're not going to move the airplane. And the last I saw, and I know these numbers are probably higher right now, but the last I saw the numbers we had implemented that process on 800 airplane moves, and we had stopped the airplanes 200 of those 800 times.
So long-winded, that's how we're not getting the traveled work. We're not traveling the airplanes. And so if the work is not done, we're getting it done. We're holding the airplanes and getting it done and being much more disciplined. Now I'll also say our supply chain is in much better shape than it was prestrike.
So we're not dealing with near the number of shortages that we were prior to that. Look, on the defense side, it is around this new focus on working with our customers to get these contracts so that is a win-win. We've made real good progress as I've talked about, particularly like on the T-7, VC-25, the Starliner.
I think we've got all these programs now well contained in terms of what our ETC. Now I'm not claiming victory here yet. We've got a lot of work to do on the ETCs on a lot of these programs. But I do think our disciplined cost risk management and active management with our customers to get to a win-win on these programs is helping.
And obviously, our goal here is to get our defense business back up to a high single-digit kind of performing business. And there's no reason I see that we can't do that. So this is a good step, but we've got to continue to have good EAC performance to make that happen. And the team is really focused on doing that.

Brian West

And on the tankers specifically, Noah, that crack on the leading edge. The team identified it very quickly, determined it wasn't a safety of flight issue, the population that they had to go do was small the rework they could get to that very quickly. So it really wasn't a big deal. So it didn't disrupt the quarter at all.

Noah Poponak

Okay. I appreciate all the detail. And Matt, congrats on the promotion, and thanks for all the help over the years.

Matthew Welch

Thanks, Noah

Operator

Peter Arment, Baird.

Peter Arment

Yeah, thanks. Hi Kelly, Brian. Congrats Matt. Kelly, I guess maybe just to wrap up a little bit on a lot of questions around the rate breaks. But -- when you get to 38 and obviously, your -- the FAA is reviewing the KPIs with you.
How do we think about that when you're moving beyond rate 42 or rate 47, is that something you're doing in concert with the FAA? I know you mentioned the field that you're looking for stability first on all those. Is it just keeping them in the loop or are they more involved in the process? Appreciate it.

Kelly Ortberg

No. Our current plan is that unless -- until the plans change, we will go through the same process with each rate break. So the metrics, they have access to the metrics. We have a digital dashboard. They look at them on a daily basis.
So it's not just looking at one point in time. They're regularly looking on these. So that's why I said when we go from 42 to 47. If we're not stable for a couple of months, we'll stay at that rate until we get the stability. And so we think the fastest we'd want to go would be about six months in between rate breaks.
But it really -- we do have to have a stable production system. And they're going to be the same KPIs that we're using on the initial rate break. I said this last quarter, and I think it's going to still be true is that I think the first rate break will be, maybe take the longest just because it's not something we've collectively done before.
I think we've got a good plan to do it, but that may take a little while to get through that plan. Then I think it's going to be much more standard work, and we've always had a process with the FAA, we call it capstone reviews, where we do a major FAA review before we go higher in a rate increase. So this isn't really a new thing to sit down with the FAA as we go through rate increases. We just have a new process here to do it.

Noah Poponak

Thanks for all the call. I appreciate it.

Operator

Robert Stallard, Vertical Research.

Robert Stallard

Thanks so much. Good morning.

Kelly Ortberg

Hey Rob.

Robert Stallard

Congrats, Matt, on the move. A quick question on the sale you announced yesterday. Brian, maybe give us some idea of what the impact could be on future EBIT and free cash flow dilution as this exits the business? And what you expect your net cash proceeds to be after tax from the sale? Thank you.

Brian West

Thanks, Rob. So on the margin question, this is not going to disrupt our long-term view as to be in the mid double-digit margins for the business. It's just not a very big impact. So I'm not worried about that at all. And the service business will continue to perform in that grow in the mid-single digits revenue and deliver nice mid-teen margins, so that will be consistent.
This is nothing to do with that. In terms of the deal itself, the -- there's not a lot of leakage on this. So you can think about it being $10 billion net. So it's going to be pretty close to the full purchase price. And then I'd also add that the way this deal got done is that it's all cash.
So it's important to know that we're not going to take any risk between signing and closing, which I think is good for the company and good to get this behind us.

Peter Arment

Okay, thanks so much.

Matthew Welch

And Rob, we have time for one final question.

Operator

Richard Safran, Seaport Research Partners.

Richard Safran

Thanks. Kelly, Brian, good morning, Matt. Congrats. I think you guys have talked several times about your portfolio shaping. I thought maybe you'd update us on where the Jeppesen sale leaves you as you look forward. Is there anything else that you're considering on any other items on the list. And on Jeppesen specifically, I think it's a pretty important digital asset. So I was just wondering how you think about where to set the perimeter of the deal.
I was wondering if you kept what you needed to ensure you have a strong digital capability going forward? Thanks.

Kelly Ortberg

Yeah, so that's a good question. We spent an extraordinarily long time looking at the boundary of this and ensuring that we're retaining access to everything we need for the future of our aircraft. You're right, it's a great digital asset. We'll continue to do business with Jeppesen even post divestiture.
It's a great. It's a great asset. But I can assure you that all the things that we need for the success of our cockpits and our future aircraft support and maintenance we've retained either access to that or it was outside of the perimeter of what we're talking about in the divestiture.
We do have a couple more, Rich, that we're looking at. I would say that they're probably not going to be as big as Jeppe, but we've got a couple more things that I'd like to action in the portfolio. I am done with the review. So I kind of have our mind on what we need to do here. I think a couple more smaller activities are probably in the cards, and we'll just have to see how those play out over time.

Richard Safran

Well, thanks very much.

Kelly Ortberg

Thanks, Rich.

Operator

And that concludes the Boeing Company's first-quarter 2025 earnings conference call. Thank you for joining.