Participants

Glen J. Weiss; Executive VP of Office Leasing & Co-Head of Real Estate; Vornado Realty Trust

Michael J. Franco; President & CFO; Vornado Realty Trust

Steven Roth; Chairman of the Board & CEO; Vornado Realty Trust

Steven J. Borenstein; Senior VP, Corporation Counsel & Secretary; Vornado Realty Trust

Alexander David Goldfarb; MD & Senior Research Analyst; Piper Sandler & Co., Research Division

Dylan Robert Burzinski; Analyst; Green Street Advisors, LLC, Research Division

Floris Gerbrand Hendrik Van Dijkum; MD & Senior Research Analyst; Compass Point Research & Trading, LLC, Research Division

John P. Kim; MD & Senior U.S. Real Estate Analyst; BMO Capital Markets Equity Research

Julien Blouin; Research Analyst; Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Research Division

Michael Anderson Griffin; Research Analyst; Citigroup Inc., Research Division

Michael Robert Lewis; Director & Co-Lead REIT Analyst; Truist Securities, Inc., Research Division

Nicholas Philip Yulico; Analyst; Scotiabank Global Banking and Markets, Research Division

Stephen Thomas Sakwa; Senior MD & Senior Equity Research Analyst; Evercore ISI Institutional Equities, Research Division

Presentation

Operator

Good morning, and welcome to the Vornado Realty Trust First Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. My name is MJ and I will be your operator for today's call. This call is being recorded for replay purposes. (Operator Instructions)
I would now like to turn the call over to Steven Borenstein, Executive Vice President and Corporation Counsel. Please go ahead.

Steven J. Borenstein

Welcome to Vornado Realty Trust's first quarter earnings call. Yesterday afternoon, we issued our first quarter earnings release and filed our quarterly report on Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents as well as our supplemental financial information packages are available on our website, www.vno.com, under the Investor Relations section. In these documents and during today's call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in our earnings release, Form 10-Q and financial supplement.
Please be aware that statements made during this call may be deemed forward-looking statements, and actual results may differ materially from these statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Please refer to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, for more information regarding these risks and uncertainties. The call may include time-sensitive information that may be accurate only as of today's date. The company does not undertake a duty to update any forward-looking statements.
On the call today from management for our opening comments are Steven Roth, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Michael Franco, President and Chief Financial Officer. Our senior team is also present and available for questions.
I will now turn the call over to Steven Roth.

Steven Roth

Thank you, Steve, and good morning, everyone. We've been busy. Let's start with Bloomberg. As a reminder, 731 Lexington Avenue, the mixed-use tower, whose 950,000 square foot office condo is Bloomberg's global headquarters is owned by Alexander's, a separately traded public REIT. Vornado owns 32.4% of Alexander's. The background facts are: Bloomberg lease expires in February 2029, and $500 million of debt on the office condo is due next month June 2024.
Yesterday, we announced that we renewed and extended the Bloomberg lease for an 11-year term to begin in February 2029 and take us through February 2040. So 16 years of term from now. As you can imagine, a redeveloper in town tried to poach Bloomberg. And of course, they looked at every opportunity as they must. We are delighted that they chose to stay with 731 Lexington.
By the way, the building is as much Mike's creation as mine. He had significant input into the design of the original building. The design of the building in Bloomberg's internal fit-out are on par with what we would have built today. But of course, now they don't need to.
The terms of the lease was filled out in yesterday's SEC filings, tenant concessions in the form of TIs and free rent have been established and the net rent will be the subject of an appraisal in 2029 with then rent adjusted up or down no more than 10% either way based on the rent market conditions.
We're in the process of refinancing this asset, but I must say, I am not excited about paying today's market rate of 7% or even 8% for debt with all the trappings of leasing reserves, cash suites as such, which are admittedly protective of the lender, but don't do much for our equity value. As we speak, my personal favorite is to pay the debt down and maybe even pay the debt off. We shall see.
Now let's focus on our credit lines. Traditionally, we've had 2 separate but similar credit lines with staggered maturities. One credit line for $1.25 billion has been renewed through 2027, and the renewal of the second credit line was finalized last Friday at a reduced amount of $915 million, with a term extended to April 2029. As expected in these times, several banks dropped out. We use our credit lines very sparingly, generally for short-term requirements with a known source of repayment and rarely have we exceeded 25% drawdowns.
Now to 280 Park Avenue. We own 50% of 280 Park Avenue. Since our joint venture partner has already reported, I'm guessing you are all pretty much up to date on the details. What we did here was extend the maturity of the senior loan for 4 years, keeping the rate constant with no pay down, but posting significant cash reserves for future leasing.
Several analysts have commented that the loan and the equity value pretty much cancel out and that fact allowed us to DPO the mezz loan at $0.50 on the dollar, realizing a $31.3 million gain at share, which we will recognize in the second quarter. This is not yet a big win, but it does create a cheap warrant on a wonderful asset located in Prime Park Avenue where there is already a very low 7% vacancy and a shortage of space. We think it's a first-class bet. By the way, we are leasing very well here.
We continue to protect our balance sheet with interest rate caps and swaps, but when a 3% loan matures into a 7% market, there really is no place to hide. We continue to prospect for good real estate in distress, where our best-in-class operating platform can be helpful to the lender. We expect these opportunities to accelerate.
The gold rush on the part of the luxury brands to own, control and dominate the very best locations is accelerating and the knock-on effect on prime New York City retail space is palpable. It should be noted that in New York, we have much more prime retail space than anyone else by a wide margin. Some commentators have noted that the Fifth Avenue and Times Square values seem to have recovered to the pricing of our retail JV sale 5 years ago, it would seem so.
I continue to strongly believe the contrarian bull case I made in my annual shareholders' letter that basically with frozen supply, i.e., no new developer office starts and none on the horizon, tenant requirements picking up and vacancies shrinking, I couldn't be more optimistic about the future. And also note that while the New York market has a huge 422 million square feet, when you cancel out the non-prime space, we really only compete in a much smaller 177 million square foot market.
Great things are happening in our PENN District. Come by and take a look. Our team here at Vornado couldn't be more optimistic.
Now over to Michael.

Michael J. Franco

Thank you, Steve, and good morning, everyone. As expected, the financial results for the quarter were down from last year due to items that we previously forecasted.
First quarter comparable FFO as adjusted was $0.55 per share compared to $0.60 per share for last year's first quarter, a decrease of $0.05. This decrease is primarily driven by lower NOI from higher net interest expense and no move outs, partially offset by lower G&A expense. We have provided a quarter-over-quarter bridge in our earnings release in our financial supplement.
However, from New York business, same-store cash NOI was down 5.1%, primarily due to the aforementioned expirations. As we indicated in our last earnings call, we expect our 2024 comparable FFO to be down from 2023 comparable FFO of $2.61 per share, primarily due to higher projected net interest expense of about $0.30 per share and the impact of known vacancies at certain of our properties, primarily at 1290 Avenue of the Americas, 770 Broadway, 280 Park Avenue.
We anticipate the impact of these expirations in 2024 to be roughly $0.25 to $0.30 per share. We expect this impact to be temporary as we have already leased up a good chunk of this space but the GAAP earnings from these leases won't begin until sometime in 2025. We then expect earnings to increase as income from the lease-up of PENN and other vacancies comes online and as rates trend down.
Now turning to leasing markets. The New York office market continues to show signs of strengthening. While first quarter office leasing in New York took a bit of a breather from the strong year-end, there is a healthy backlog of activity with a number of large deals in the works. Overall, tenant space requirements continue to trend upward, sublease space continues to fall, best-in-class renovated and amenitized product located in transit hubs continues to dominate leasing and the new supply pipeline is close to 0. These dynamics set the table for continued improvement and conditions in the upper tier of the market, which we are already experiencing in our best-of-class portfolio.
Overall, asking rents are stable, even rising in the top-tier properties but concessions remain stubbornly high across all submarkets. The financial services and legal sectors are continuing to drive the leasing activity as both are in growth mode. We are also seeing the first signs of life in the tech sector again after a couple of years of being on pause or downsizing. And our experience is when they grow, they tend to lease big chunks of space.
The Midtown and new West side markets are outperforming as leasing activity in Midtown is strong, not only on Park Avenue, but also on Sixth Avenue, in the Fifth Avenue, Madison Avenue Corridor. On the West side, tenant demand continues at pace. If you walk from Seventh Avenue to the Hudson River, you will see why.
Turning now to our leasing activity. After completing a slew of large leases in December 2023 and finishing last year with a market-leading 2.1 million square feet of deals, we expect that a more muted first quarter of completed transactions given where our deal pipeline stood in the negotiation process.
In the first quarter, we leased 291,000 square feet at a healthy $89 per square foot, reflecting the overall quality and premium locations of our properties. The highlight of the quarter was our 125,000 square foot headquarters lease with Major League Soccer at the new PENN 2. MLS had been in the market for some time, looking mainly in the Midtown core until late in their process when they toured PENN 2 and were wowed by what we've done with the building in the district. The project is now complete and really shows terrifically. Our new town hall event space is open. By the way, we hosted our first event just 2 weeks ago attended by 300 people. And the rooftop, pavilion and park are truly spectacular. Tenants are responding positively to everything that we've done and what's still to come. We have a significant pipeline of PENN 2 and are busy negotiating proposals with tenants across a variety of industry sectors.
In addition to the significant Bloomberg lease renewal of almost 1 million square feet we just completed, our leasing pipeline is strong with 370,000 feet of leases in negotiation and another 2.5 million feet of proposals out on the street in different stages. Much of this activity is not only addressing current vacancy, but also forward-looking expirations.
As discussed on the fourth quarter call, when we foreshadowed an occupancy decline due to the known Q1 move-outs at properties such as 1296 Avenue and 280 Park. We are pleased to report that we have already taken care of half of the 2024 and 2025 expirations in these properties with more activity on the horizon and [reach].
Turning to retail. The retail leasing market continues to recover. As we discussed in our last call, Prada's and Caring's blockbuster retail deals on Fifth Avenue that occurred in December demonstrated their long-term commitment to Manhattan and has further energized the market and there are other potential sales rumored to be in the works. Vacancy rates are now below prepandemic 2019 levels in most Manhattan submarkets and retailers are willing to pay top dollar for the best locations. Our retail leasing activity has picked up meaningfully in the last couple of quarters with almost all our assets seeing significant interest.
As evidence of the rebound this quarter, in addition to signing many leases in the PENN District, we completed an important long-term renewal at one of our Time Square assets at the highest annual dollar rent we've achieved in our portfolio since pre-COVID, over $15 million per year.
Turning to the capital markets now. While the financing markets still remain challenging, we are starting to see some stability for high-quality products. The CMBS market has begun to selectively reopen for office, lending at conservative metrics on quality assets with long weighted average lease term. Unsecured bond spreads for office continue to tighten.
The market is much more open for high-quality retail. That being said, coupons are still high. Banks remain on the sidelines and generally in workout mode, and there's more pain to come for all lenders given the volume of office maturities in the next few years. This will create opportunities for us.
We have been and continue to be very active on the capital markets front. In addition to the recent extensions on 280 Park and 435 Seventh, we are also in the process of extending our other 2024 maturities, which we expect to complete soon.
Finally and importantly, as Steve mentioned, just a few days ago, we finalized the recast of our revolver that was scheduled to mature in 2026 for $915 million. Completing this refinancing solidified a key portion of our liquidity through 2029 and gives us significant runway to deal with any challenges over the next few years. It also highlights the continued support of our key banks in this challenging environment. We thank them for their support.
Our balance sheet remains in very good shape with strong liquidity. Pro forma for the new revolver size, our current liquidity is a strong $2.7 billion, including $1.1 billion of cash and restricted cash and $1.6 billion undrawn under our $2.17 billion revolving credit facilities.
With that, I'll turn it over to the operator for Q&A.

Question and Answer Session

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Today's first question comes from Steve Sakwa with Evercore ISI.

Stephen Thomas Sakwa

Michael, I was wondering if you could just follow up a little bit on the comments you made about the pipeline? And just maybe help us think through how much of that 2.5 million square feet is maybe earmarked for our PENN 2 in the development? And how much is geared for, I guess, future rollovers? And how much is geared to kind of current vacancy in the portfolio?

Michael J. Franco

Glen, do you want to take the lead on that?

Glen J. Weiss

Sure. So I would say it's a very, very balanced mix of what you just described. We're seeing a surge in proposals coming in on PENN -- both PENN 1 and PENN 2 coming off the heels of our Major League Soccer lease. We're seeing expirations -- outbound expirations tenants coming to us to early renew just like we did with Bloomberg this week. And in addition, much of the pipeline is attacking expiration at the buildings where we have space available today. I'd say it's a healthy mix across the portfolio, PENN and otherwise.

Stephen Thomas Sakwa

Okay. And as a follow-up, Michael, just to -- I guess go back to some of the information you provided on kind of -- I guess, the earnings drag from the lost occupancy this year. Just to be clear, if you took the $0.30 hit from the interest expense and now you're sort of quantifying this $0.25 to $0.30 hit from the known vacate, some of which I know has been released and will rebound maybe in '25 and beyond. You're kind of suggesting that there's sort of $0.60 drag this year as we think about '24 and then other positive offsets that might sort of take that number a little bit up from, say, the $2 level?

Michael J. Franco

Yes. So look, in terms of your sort of detail there. I think that's accurate, right? We talked about interest last quarter and sort of reaffirmed the $0.30 this quarter. The $0.25 to $0.30 are sort of the known vacates and as we've mentioned, we've backfilled a lot of that already at 1290 and 280. Like we have a lot that we're working on. There's some things that could certainly make that number more positive. But I think we're trying to give you the downside version today. And so I can't tell you where exactly it's going to come out. But I think if you say, look, let's take sort of worst case, the $0.30 plus the [25 to 30] gets you down $0.55 to $0.60. I think that's a good baseline. And our objective is to beat that, but there's still a lot moving around.

Steven Roth

Steve, let me just tack on, on that for a second. So I mean, the numbers that you mentioned that and that Michael just mentioned, they're accurate for this year. Let's build from there and see what the company's future looks like on an almost certain basis.
So if you start with re-renting the vacancies and we get back from whatever we are now to our normal 96%, 97%, 98% occupancy, that adds a big number to our earnings. When 2 PENN comes online, that's another $100 million give or take of earnings that comes online that is brand new. If interest rates settle down into some kind of stabilized number, that also improves earnings enormously.
So the company has the earnings potential of being, we think, pretty spectacular. And that's what we're shooting for. So we're looking at it not 1 month on quarter basis, we're looking at what the company's earning power would be pick a number 2, 3 years out, okay? And we are extremely excited about that.

Operator

The next question is from John Kim with BMO Capital Markets.

John P. Kim

Michael, in your prepared remarks, you talked about tech sector coming back to the market in Manhattan and also referenced retailers potentially looking to purchase their flagship stores similar to Prada. Is your commentary more of a market commentary? Or do you see Vornado involved in either one of those 2?

Michael J. Franco

I think it's both, John. I mean we've got some of the best product in town in both categories. I think we've done more tech leasing than any other landlord in the city. We have all the big 4 in our portfolio. So we maintain an active dialogue with all those players. So I would expect that if the tech sector becomes active again, we're going to get more than our fair share.
And in terms of the pipeline, I think the tech sector was pretty dormant for the last 18, 24 months, either on pause or in some cases, downsizing space. And we've seen in the last 90 days, a real pickup there, started small and now we're seeing some more significant requirements. So we do think some of those will convert to activity, and we're quite optimistic about that sector turning on again.
On the retail side, I think you know better than anybody, given the discussions we've had in the past. We own the best retail in the city. So if you want to be on Fifth Avenue, particularly given the shrinking amount of availability, that's -- can be leased. We're the first, second, third call Times Square. We own both sides (inaudible).
So activity level has picked up significantly in both those submarkets, the animal spirits are alive and well amongst retailers. They see the Manhattan is thriving again, their sales numbers reflected and Prada and Kering's announcements obviously garner worldwide attention. And I think make every other retailer question, what are we doing, right, both from a leasing standpoint and buying standpoint. There's obviously been other transactions rumored but I don't think you've seen the last of the retail purchases. And obviously, given our portfolio, we're fertile ground. So we expect to be in the mix there.

John P. Kim

Okay. And my follow-up is on 350 Park Avenue. The leasing environment and the interest rate environment or the outlook has changed a lot in the past 1.5 years since you struck the deal. What is the likelihood that either Citadel or you exercise your options at this point?

Steven Roth

There's always a likelihood. But right now, we're on full steam ahead to build a world-class headquarters for Citadel. We've started the public approval process. And it's a couple of year process to design the building, complete the drawings, get through the public approval process and obviously, we will reappraise the financial markets at that time. Citadel's growing. They want the space. They're committed to the deal as are we.

John P. Kim

And can you confirm the starting rent for Citadel is reported at $35 million?

Steven Roth

No, sir, we can't. It's a formulaic rent, which depends upon what the cost of financing is at the time that we -- at the time we go into the financing market.

Operator

The next question is from Michael Griffin with Citi.

Michael Anderson Griffin

Michael, I wanted to go back to your comments around concessions being stubbornly high. I imagine that's the case for the market overall. But if you look at maybe better off submarkets like Park Avenue or even some of your properties on the West side, the PENN District, how are you seeing concessions there given that the environment seems to have improved?

Michael J. Franco

Glen, do you want to hit that?

Glen J. Weiss

Yes. Yes, sure. it's Glen. I would tell you no matter the submarket on new leases, TIs there's somewhere between $140, $150 a foot and free rent is somewhere in the 13-month, 15-month range. I think as it relates to submarket specific, it's really about the rent. So in some of the submarkets, we are seeing an uptick in rent where supply is tightening as you would expect.

Michael Anderson Griffin

Got you. That's helpful. And then maybe just some color on lease expirations this year. It looks like there's a big one in the second quarter, about 3% of the overall rent. The space rent there right now seems pretty high. What's the likelihood of renewing or backfilling the space? Or is this one of those known move-outs that you described earlier?

Glen J. Weiss

It's the Meta space that comes back to us in June that we spoke about on our last earnings call. That's the least you're pertaining to.

Michael Anderson Griffin

And in terms of potential of backfilling or new in the space, what's demand looking like on it?

Glen J. Weiss

We have action on this space. That's part of our pipeline that we've described. We feel very good about the asset and very good about backfilling that space. It's the most unique asset in Midtown South, we feel good about it.

Operator

The next question is from Floris Van Dijkum with Compass Point.

Floris Gerbrand Hendrik Van Dijkum

Rather than get into the details on the leasing, which obviously is very important as well. But I wanted to ask a question on sort of the market and get Steve and Michael's view on the opportunity that's going to be presenting itself, I think, when the $200 billion of office loans mature over the next -- actually, in '24 as well as the other $100 billion next year. What do you see happening with some of those obviously are unlikely to be refinanced. And so where do you see Vornado in that situation? Do you have -- can you play a role in maybe buying some assets? And maybe does that hope -- cause some of the bullishness in Steve's tone on the outlook for the next 2 years?

Michael J. Franco

So like, I think in terms of the debt rolling over, which is significant over the next 2 years, as we all know, the capital markets are not there to support refinancing the vast majority of that. And so I think what happens there is going to take one of a few forms. It depends on the quality asset, the sponsor of the asset and what its future looks like. And we've seen some examples where the older obsolete buildings, where debt rolls doesn't have a future is an office building or certainly with that sponsor and the lenders have taken it back or there's been a consensual sale of some of those assets, something like a 1740 Broadway would be a recent example.
So I think we'll see a fair amount of that on some of those older buildings. Then there's a category where they just over leverage where there is a future. And again, I think the lender will assess whether the sponsor has the wherewithal and the capability to either re-tenant or support the asset. And in some cases, they will, in many cases, they won't.
We're talking to the lenders about that. And I think they'll look for solutions, right? I think lenders in general know that taking back assets and operating them certainly in the office space is not a winning strategy. Value deteriorates fairly quickly. Tenants don't want to go into those buildings.
So we do think there's going to be opportunity to work with existing lenders, be a solutions provider. We have a leading operating platform. We expect to deploy capital there. And I think it could be in either one of those buckets. It could be buildings that are -- that with our capabilities can be leased back up, stabilize, the value could be created or it can be assets that can be repurposed from office to residential potentially. So the answer is we are actively looking. We expect to play in that. And I think we're still at the beginning stages.

Floris Gerbrand Hendrik Van Dijkum

And I know it's early in terms of what transactions would look like. But presumably, for you to utilize part of your significant cash awards, which again sets you apart from some of your peers, you would have to have, I would imagine, returns that are in excess of the 7% plus financing rates that you would have to pay today if you were to theoretically get assets. Is that the right way to think about it? Your returns...

Michael J. Franco

Yes. I mean, look, I think our objective of deploying cash is not to invest in real estate is going to generate core returns, right? And this is an opportunity that is by the way, not for the faint of heart, right? I mean, you're taking risk and you want to get rewarded for that. So the returns need to be attractive. So yes, I think the stabilized yields, I think it depends a little bit on the nature of the asset and where you think ultimate cap rates settle out for particular assets. But no question that the required yield are in the neighborhood that you mentioned.

Floris Gerbrand Hendrik Van Dijkum

Great. Maybe one follow-up in terms of your retail segment, again, particularly your Fifth Avenue, which is, again, as you highlight, unique. Where do you think market rents are today? And I know you have -- 92%, I think, is your occupancy rate in your Time Square JV, sorry your Fifth Avenue in Times Square JV, but if you were to sign rent today in -- on Fifth Avenue, where would you say market rents are for that space?

Michael J. Franco

I think it's -- there's been a couple of transactions that we signed probably, I guess, last year. And now it indicates that rents at the time were in the mid- to high $2,000 per square foot, right? Now maybe there was a tick or a bottom in the $1,000, $1,500 neighborhood, but I think realistically, it's back into that mid-2s, maybe even low 3s, depending on the situation. And I think for luxury, given there's such a scarcity it could be higher.
So Fifth Avenue, it's hard to paint a broad brush. It's a very scarce asset class. And for the right situation, you can command rents that not too far off the peak. For the wrong asset with retailers don't think it configures well, you can achieve that. So look, I think rents have recovered quite a bit. They're continuing to recover. Obviously, the Times Square lease we signed recently, I think, is evidence of that. And so we expect that to continue.

Operator

The next question comes from Dylan Burzinski with Green Street.

Dylan Robert Burzinski

I guess just sort of going back to the acquisition point. Is there any desire to -- given the lack of debt financing available out there, just sort of go into it from a debt perspective and possibly from a loan to own? Or is this purely as you guys are looking at things more so looking at things on the equity side today?

Steven Roth

The easiest way to buy a building is through the debt. So that's obviously target #1.

Dylan Robert Burzinski

Got it. And then as you guys think about opportunities, is this purely -- are you guys purely focused on office? Or are there other retail opportunities that you guys think would also make sense?

Steven Roth

We're open to buy office, obviously, and retail, obviously. So those are the 2 areas that we specialize in.

Dylan Robert Burzinski

And then I guess just a broader capital allocation question. I know in the past, you guys have floated opportunistically selling assets. I guess, is that still on the table? Or are you guys now more focused on sort of going out and acquiring assets and growing the company on an external growth basis?

Steven Roth

We have, I think, basically 4 fairly significant sale transactions that are in various stages of conversation right now as we speak.

Operator

The next question comes from Alexander Goldfarb with Piper Sandler.

Alexander David Goldfarb

So 2 questions here. And first, Michael, good to hear about the rebound in street retail rents. That's really amazing what a journey it's been. So the first question is Steve, on the Bloomberg lease, so when we read the Q, the rents that are cited in there are basically a sliding scale that a negotiation in the future will address. So it's not as though we take that the one rent and then it slides up to the next. It's -- that's the range that the negotiation will be in?

Steven Roth

Alex, you still published something that said there was a 25% discount in the rent. I don't know how you got that math and that's incorrect. So the way the deal is structured is, the basic rent on that building is basically net. There's a very small portion, maybe 50,000 feet out of the 950,000 feet that's growth. But 900,000 feet of it is net. So let's call it a net lease. The lease has a bump between now and 2029. And so when we get to the end of 2029, where we basically start, the net rent is $98 a foot, which grosses up to well into the $150 a foot. So that's the starting point.
Now we established -- first of all, you recognize that we are renewing and extending a lease 5 years before the mature -- before the lease expires. And so you have to take -- affect the future -- unknown future and the contingency. So what we did there was we established what the tenant concessions, TIs and leasing commissions for, those are frozen. The starting rent is frozen. And then from that, there is a market-based appraisal as to what the proper market rate would be if we did (inaudible) then expiry of the lease in 2029, taking into account the already established tenant concession. But the color is though that it can't be more than 10% more than the $98 a foot net or 10% less.
So we have certainty on the bottom is what the rent would be and it will be established as the fair rent in the [zen] market, which we think was a very clever. By the way, both tenant landlord think was a fair deal and a clever way of handling the future. There's nothing in this deal whatsoever that contemplates any reduction in the rent. It will be a arbitration on the market.

Alexander David Goldfarb

Steve, thank you, and I apologize for getting that incorrect. That was -- my apologies. So your clarification is that the rent that's cited it...

Steven Roth

Wait a second, I accept your apology. That's very generous of you.

Alexander David Goldfarb

Well, [I mean it]. So basically, the way the rent is characterized now is the $29 million a quarter is characterized as gross, whereas the rents that are in the queue for the terms are now net. And it sounds like that's the confusion that I had on my end. Is that correct?

Steven Roth

I won't get into why you were confused. I'm just happy that you admit that you were confused.

Alexander David Goldfarb

Okay, Great. The next question is on the rents for this year to Steve Sakwa's question, Michael, you mentioned that originally it was down $0.25 to $0.30. Now it seems to be down $0.55 based on further lease move-outs, what have you. Was there some stuff that fell out of bed that was unexpected? Or what -- or did I not hear correctly? I just want to understand like was there stuff that came up and surprised? Or what drove -- what's driving the additional earnings impact this year?

Michael J. Franco

Yes, yes. Maybe a little bit more confusion there, Alex. On the last call, we talked about that it was early in the year. I gave clarity on the interest reduction because a lot of that was baked in with hedges that were going to roll off. We knew those where those are going to roll off to. And we mentioned that there would be an impact from the known move-outs, right? And cited what those were. But obviously, there's a lot moving out.
So it was -- we didn't quantify what the impact of those numbers were. We're quantifying that for everybody's benefit on this call. So I don't think -- no surprises, right, just trying to put a little more precision on it now that we're in May as opposed to where we were. And look, there's going to be more that moves around and that number could be less.
But I think in terms of where we sit today, we have a known set between particularly 1290, 770, 280 that drive the bulk of that. Obviously, we've talked about re-leasing a lot of that and a lot of those deals have been announced. But just trying to get more precision to just the general statement we made last quarter.

Operator

The next question is from Michael Lewis with Truist Securities.

Michael Robert Lewis

I'm just going to follow up on that question about the re-leasing activity on some of the known move-outs. So I could probably triangulate an occupancy rate on that $0.25 drag. But could you share -- maybe just share how much square footage is related to known move-outs this year? And how much of that square footage you've already addressed?

Steven Roth

Do anyone want to take that or I take that?

Glen J. Weiss

So the bulk of the number is at 280 Park, 770 Broadway and 1290 Avenue Americas. At 1290 and 280, we've taken care of as Michael said in his remarks, 51% of the role, so call it 500,000 of 1 million feet. And as we said at 770 Broadway, we have Meta rolling in June. Along with the current vacancy, we have pipeline activity on that space.
So that's how we're approaching the big ones that are in that occupancy number. So as we've taken into account our pipeline of deals, as we take into account our expirations going through '24, we may see more of a dip in occupancy. And as we complete transactions during the next 6 to 9 months, we expect that occupancy to then climb back as we get into 2025.

Michael Robert Lewis

And then my second question is about THE MART. So occupancy dips down to 77.6% in the most recent quarter, prepandemic, that was always 95% to 100%. Could you maybe talk a little bit about kind of the road map there? And what you think stabilized occupancy or given that there's obviously some volatility with that asset. What may be like a stabilized kind of revenue figure might look like for THE MART?

Michael J. Franco

So I'll start, Glen, you jump in. Like the Chicago market is obviously challenging right now, probably one of the more challenging ones in the country. But we do have decent activity on the asset. I would say that alluding to some of the prior questions, there's quite a bit of distress in Chicago office. Many landlords do not have the wherewithal to lease our assets given the debt situation there. We have an asset that has no debt on it. And so I think the sponsorship, the strength is well known by the brokers and the tenants, and I think that's helping us.
We just finished what we call MART 2.0, which is the second stage of amenities that we have put in business conferencing, et cetera. And again, the reaction has been positive. So the market is tough, cannot dismiss that. But I think we're seeing more than our fair share there. And I think that's going to take probably 3 years to get back to stabilized occupancy realistically, maybe it's 2. But I think when the income fully comes online, it's probably in the neighborhood. And our objective is to get it back into the 90s percent occupied, get a 95-plus percent and get the income back up to that $90 million to $100 million cash NOI basis. So there's a fair amount of growth to come there. But the market is, as I said, challenging right now.

Operator

The next question is from Caitlin Burrows with Goldman Sachs.

Julien Blouin

This is Julien on for Caitlin. One quick one. Can you comment on whether the leasing spreads in the quarter benefited from the PENN District leasing? And what that leasing spread might have been ex-PENN leases?

Michael J. Franco

Yes. I think the answer is that the spreads, PENN 2 is majorly soccer with the big lease in this quarter. That's a new lease, first generation. So didn't affect the spread.

Julien Blouin

Okay. Good to know. And then a second one on the debt covenant, it looked like interest coverage and fixed charge coverage tightened a bit in the quarter. I know longer term, the metric is going to benefit from the occupancy gain you've talked about from PENN District NOI. And it also sounds like you have some sales underway. But can you give us a sense of maybe the trajectory over the coming quarters given the fact that -- I know there's that sort of big swap expiration at 555 Cal?

Michael J. Franco

Yes. No, you're accurate. I think the impact this quarter was predominantly -- the big item was the swap increase on PENN 11 this year coming up. I think if I go from recollection, I think it was 17 basis points, though, too bad that couldn't go forever. But that was the material item this quarter, a couple of other things as well. But that was a big one.
Next quarter, second quarter, if you will, you're accurate 555. We put in place another swap that would kick in an increase. So as we look forward, we continue to have sufficient cushion in our covenants, fixed charge will tighten up over the next couple of quarters, but we still have [vision] buffer there. And then as the income comes online from some of these leases that number will grow again. But it will tighten up a little bit based on the 555 swap rate increase.

Operator

The next question is from Nick Yulico with Scotiabank.

Nicholas Philip Yulico

I just wanted to go back to the $0.25, $0.30 impact this year from vacancy. So I guess that adds up to about $55 million, $60 million of NOI versus your total NOI share last year of $1.14 billion. So it's somewhere like a 5% NOI loss on that math, that's correct.
So I guess I'm just wondering, how does that -- are there other moving parts here besides just some of the vacancy impact you talked about? Because if I look at your supplement, in the fourth quarter, you had 5% of your rent expiring in New York, and you're obviously not all expiring. So the 5% NOI loss number seems a little bit high relative to what your expirations were this year.

Michael J. Franco

There may be one tenant that expired December 31 last year. But like I think in a nutshell, that's it. I mean it's pure and simple. The vast majority of it is 1296, 280 Park and 770 and you get to that sort of number. I mean there's a little bit of positives, a little bit of negatives, but those are the 3 main drivers.
So we just -- we came through a period where there were some known move-outs, and we're backfilling those as we discussed. But that's it. And it just occurred at various stages everywhere from December 31 through probably the last one is Meta, which is in the middle of this year.

Nicholas Philip Yulico

Okay. And then I just wanted to be clear on the way to think about occupancy and Michael, last quarter when you're talking about sort of a flattish occupancy this year. Does that mean that by the time we get to the fourth quarter of this year, it's a sort of a flat year-over-year occupancy? I'm assuming it's not a sort of average occupancy for the year that would be flat year-over-year based on that.

Michael J. Franco

Yes. Yes. I would say by the end of the year, I mean, again, it depends on timing of certain things. And I don't know that I can [pay you] with precision. This will happen by the fourth quarter as opposed to January, what not. But we think rough numbers will end up there.
So -- but we'll see, there's still -- we're still in the first half of the year, and we just have to see how it plays out. But I think like occupancy, it's down now. It's going to trend down a little bit more, given, for example, the Meta move-out in June, but we have some other things in the works that we can pick that up. So we'll see where it comes out in total.
I think as we look at the front line, it will -- we think it increased meaningfully over time. We are going to bring PENN 2 into the numbers next year. Depending on where we are from a leasing standpoint there, that number could bring the average down. But obviously, that's sort of an extraneous event being added to the denominator. So we'll evaluate it as we get closer.

Operator

The next question is a follow-up from Michael Lewis with Truist.

Michael Robert Lewis

I just have one more. You sold 2 condo units at 220 Central Park South for about $32 million. Are the remaining 4 units similar in value, roughly $16 million a unit? I don't know if you have -- maybe you have a penthouse left or you have smaller units. I was just wondering about that.

Steven Roth

No. The remaining 4 units are smaller, lower view impaired, so they're much less valuable. Basically, that job is basically sold out.

Operator

The next question is a follow-up from Alexander Goldfarb with Piper Sandler.

Alexander David Goldfarb

Thank you. Steve, with the new office to conversion incentives, does this open the door for you to contemplate either assets from the existing portfolio or perhaps assets that are -- that you've always eyed is would be great for conversion and seem to maybe have a motivated owner who would be willing. Just seems like the incentive package that they passed is pretty lucrative for office landlords to convert.

Steven Roth

Alex, yes, the answer is yes, of course. So there's a couple of things. First of all, the building that you're going to be converting, the target building has the price somewhere in the neighborhood of [some $200 a foot or sub-$200 a foot]. So these are really distressed office building. They're not -- they're distressed office building. Let me leave it at that. So the pricing and the economics really don't allow you to pay more, maybe even a pinch more, but probably not. So that's step number one.
Step number 2 is, is that obviously, if those are the economics and those are the target building, these are the B and C buildings in the office market. So when those buildings are taken out of the conventional office market, they really don't tell the prime A market because the tenants that we deal is who are interested in A space don't really ever look at that.
So the answer is, is that we will be able to, as an industry, convert a decent number of buildings. It will make a dent -- not a big dent, but a dent in the residential market and the demand for residential space. But it will have a marginal effect on the conventional Class A open market.
But clearly, we're looking at that. It's an interesting activity and it's something that we will look at. I'm not 100% sure that the returns on capital are going to be what some people think they are. But anyway, we are looking at it pretty aggressively.

Operator

Thank you very much. There are no further questions at this time.

Steven Roth

Okay. Thank you all very much. We appreciate you joining us this morning, and we will be anxious to -- we always learn from these calls, and so thank you for that. We are excited about the next -- the quarter and the future, and we'll see you in the next earnings call. Thank you.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.