World

The Telegraph
The public sector will destroy what’s left of the UK economy
london commuters
london commuters

A kindergarten class voting for extra ‘break time’ perhaps? Or a crowded pub voting for free beer? There are probably more foregone conclusions we could all think of if we put our minds to it.

And yet when the Welsh government assembled a group of “experts”, consisting of senior public servants, to consider the weighty issue of whether they should all work four days instead five for the same amount, or even more, money, it was hardly a huge surprise that, after carefully considering all the evidence, they decided that on balance it was a great idea.

Even the normally lethal point that it might be “racist” – because four-day weeks might discriminate against “frontline” public sector workers more likely to be from ethnic minorities – couldn’t deter them. In reality, the UK’s already pampered and over-privileged public sector elite is drifting inexorably towards taking Fridays off permanently, and given the vast size of the state has reached as a share of the economy, that will destroy any prospect of economic growth.

With its growing reputation as a laboratory for batty Left-wing ideas, it was always likely to be Wales that took the lead on moving towards a four-day week. Under the leadership of Reg Kilpatrick, who has spent over 25 years working in different roles for the administration in Cardiff, it formed the Workforce Partnership Council to consider whether the country should switch to a four-day week.

The council included those world-leading thinkers in innovation and dynamism such as the trade unions, Unison, the GMB and PCS, plus the Powys, Flintshire and the Vale of Glamorgan councils, as well as Natural Resources Wales, the Hywel Dda University Health Board and the Velindre NHS Trust – all of whom, I can’t help noticing, are either organisations directly paid for by the taxpayer, or else are unions that overwhelmingly represent public sector workers.

Oddly enough, it doesn’t appear there were any major private companies involved nor, heaven forbid, any entrepreneurs trying to get a new business off the ground in Swansea or Wrexham, who might have provided an alternative point of view. The committee did pause to consider some of the drawbacks, such as whether a four-day-week might be discriminatory, or indeed whether it might mean that more staff were needed.

Even so, it concluded those obstacles could be overcome, and it was a fantastic idea: “A four-day work week can improve productivity, employee well-being, and environmental sustainability,” it said. Apparently “reducing work time by 20pc can lead to a 16pc reduction in carbon emissions, as well as lower costs for recruitment, training, and sick leave”, while it can also “enhance work-life balance, gender equality and mental health for employees”.