Plans to force bank refunds for all fraud victims ‘will backfire’
bank customers being targeted by fraudsters
bank customers being targeted by fraudsters

Plans to force banks to refund all scam victims will backfire, experts have warned, as sophisticated fraudsters will take advantage of the new rules.

Those who are targeted by “Authorised Push Payment” (APP) fraud will be entitled to get their money back in all but a very small number of cases, when new rules come in later this year.

But industry experts have warned the new rules will mean that fraudsters could pretend to be legitimate victims in order to claim reimbursements. People could also be “puppeted” by scammers, who could talk them through the reimbursement process before going on to steal that money too.

Riccardo Tordera, of the Payments Association, which represents financial firms, said: “These changes will only serve to exacerbate the issue, enabling malicious actors to pose as victims to exploit the system.”

This has not been a problem for firms that are already signed up to a voluntary compensation scheme, it is understood. But there will be more payment providers to which the new rules will apply, offering more potential targets for fraudsters.

There have already been warnings that the new rules, which come into force on October 7, could delay bank transfers for as long as four days if they are deemed suspicious, in order to give the sending bank time to reclaim the funds. Currently, banks have only 24 hours to spot and investigate fraud.

Mr Tordera said: “The new regulation may well result in the rejection of many legitimate transactions to avoid liability. Mitigating for these concerns will therefore result in slower payments, which would not necessarily result in a safer industry – just a slower one.”

APP fraud is sophisticated and can take many forms. It includes romance scams, purchase scams, such as when fake tickets for concerts are sold, and investment scams, where the victims are often sent “dashboards” that purport to show the performance of their money which has in reality disappeared into a complex labyrinth of crypto accounts.

Under the new rules, unless a victim ignores warning messages from their bank, fails to promptly notify their bank of the fraud, refuses to share information about the fraud with the payment provider or refuses to share details with the police, they will be entitled to a refund of the money they lost.

To deny a payout, the onus will be on the bank to prove that the victim acted with “gross negligence”. And if the customer is vulnerable, it will be even harder for payment providers to refuse a refund.

The payment provider sending the money will share responsibility for compensating the victim with the bank the money was sent to.