A pending Supreme Court decision threatens Apple's lucrative services business

In This Article:

FILE - In this Monday, June 4, 2018 file photo, Apple CEO Tim Cook speaks during an announcement of new products at the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference in San Jose, Calif. Since its debut 10 years ago Tuesday, July 10, 2018, Apple’s app store has unleashed new ways for us to work, play, and become lost in our screens. (AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez, File)
In this Monday, June 4, 2018 file photo, Apple CEO Tim Cook speaks during an announcement of new products at the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference in San Jose, Calif. (AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez, File)

Apple Inc.’s (AAPL) revised fiscal first quarter guidance Wednesday sent the stock into sharp decline and rattled markets, as investors evaluated whether the company’s justification for poor iPhone sales in Greater China was accurately placed in part on deceleration in the region’s markets.

In a letter to investors dated Jan. 2, Apple CEO Tim Cook wrote that the company’s fiscal first quarter revenue expectations would be adjusted to $84 billion from previous guidance between $89 billion and $93 billion.

Apple still to report record earnings

In the same letter, Cook informed investors that Apple would report record earnings per share, part of which Cook attributed, in an interview with CNBC, to the company’s services division that posted record sales and a 19% year-over-year jump in revenue. Some analysts point to Apple’s services division as a silver lining capable of buttressing sluggish demand for iPhones.

“Services has grown, you know, incredible amount,” Cook said in the CNBC interview. “We’re going to have — report over $10.8 billion and when we report later this month for last quarter. That’s a new record.”

App Store profits exposed to legal attack

Yet Apple’s App Store — part of its services division — hangs in a vulnerable position as the company awaits the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in a consumer lawsuit from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The case directly targets the App Store’s revenue stream, claiming App Store revenues are, at least in part, the ill-gotten gains of an illegal monopoly.

A man leaves an Apple store in Beijing, Thursday, Jan. 3, 2019. Apple Inc.’s $1,000 iPhone is a tough sell to Chinese consumers who are jittery over an economic slump and a trade war with Washington. The tech giant became the latest global company to collide with Chinese consumer anxiety when CEO Tim Cook said iPhone demand is waning, due mostly to China. Weak consumer demand in the world’s second-largest economy is a blow to industries from autos to designer clothing that are counting on China to drive revenue growth. (AP Photo/Andy Wong)
A man leaves an Apple store in Beijing, Thursday, Jan. 3, 2019. Apple Inc.’s $1,000 iPhone is a tough sell to Chinese consumers who are jittery over an economic slump and a trade war with Washington. (AP Photo/Andy Wong)

Cook told CNBC that services division gains were driven by App Store, Apple Music, Apple Pay, iCloud and search ad products.

“It’s very wide and each of the geographies hit a quarterly record,” Cook told CNBC. “So even in China the App Store hit a quarterly record.” Cook added that Apple picked up 100 more million active devices over the last 12 months.

Apple’s services arm generated $37.2 billion in fiscal year 2018. If the Supreme Court case, Apple v. Robert Pepper, is permitted to go forward in the lower court, it would give rise to an antitrust class action that would directly threaten profits for the division.

The consumers allege the App Store is controlling retail prices by charging developers a 30% commission passed on to app purchasers who have no alternative market in which to purchase iPhone apps.

If Apple loses at a subsequent trial, it could be a punishing blow.

Added risk comes from reports that companies are bypassing iOS app-generated subscriptions altogether in order to avoid Apple's 30% commission. A report from Tech Crunch says Netflix already rolled out a worldwide redirect taking prospective Netflix customers from the App Store to the Netflix website. According to the report, Netflix iOS app-generated subscription fees would have brought in around $256 million for Apple in 2018.