Paramount Gold's First Drill Results Support Potential for Grade Enhancement at Gold-Rich Grassy Mountain Deposit

WINNEMUCCA, NEVADA--(Marketwired - Jan 30, 2017) - Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (NYSE MKT:PZG) ("Paramount") today announced that the first results from its current drill program at its Grassy Mountain Project are exceeding expectations in terms of grade and rock quality for mining purposes.

The results to date are confirming the high-grade core of the deposit which is surrounded by a larger envelope of lower grade gold mineralization. Paramount's plan is to construct an underground mine to exploit the high-grade core. The current 29-hole drill program is part of an ongoing Pre-Feasibility Study ("PFS") required to raise resources to proven and probable reserves and complete the mine permitting process.

As reported in November 2016, Paramount began a drill program using one reverse circulation rig and two core rigs. The program was designed in conjunction with PFS consultants Mine Development Associates ("MDA"), Golder Associates ("Golder") and AUSENCO to:

  • Better define the high-grade core for underground mining and potentially expand its size and grade;

  • Acquire material for PFS-level metallurgical testing to design the recovery process including studies to better define the crushing equipment and milling circuits necessary to optimize gold recoveries;

  • Obtain geotechnical data on rock quality for underground mine design and mining methodology.

For resource confirmation and metallurgical drilling, the reverse circulation rig is being used to drill the upper portion of the holes while the two core rigs are being used to complete the lower portions of the holes in the targeted high-grade core. For geotechnical data, core rigs are being used for the entire hole employing a triple tube technique to preserve the in situ characteristics of the rock. Paramount believes that triple tube drilling and logging at the drill site provide a more accurate assessment of rock competence encountered in actual underground mining compared to the previous methodology of manipulating and transporting drill core prior to logging, which can generate additional fracturing.

Results for the first four holes completed to their targeted depths are as follows (see the map below for drill hole locations):

Hole-ID

Type

From
(ft.)

To
(ft.)

Width
(ft.)

Width(1)
(m)

Au
(g/T)

Ag
(g/T)

GM16-02

RC

130

400

270

82.4

0.60

3.2

Core

450

525

75

23.0

1.69

9.85

Core

545

685

140

43.0

47.51(2)

12.68

GM16-03

Core

85

415

330

100.7

0.53

2.0

Core

455

785

330

100.7

2.17

5.0

Including

500

672

172

52.5

3.35

7.5

Including

500

545

45

13.7

3.41

7.1

Including

605

633

28

8.5

5.96

8.7

GM16-04

Core

130

681

551

167.9

1.12

5.1

Including

520

601

81

24.7

2.48

7.3

GM16-14

Core

367

750

383

116.8

2.20

9.1

Including

546

579

33

10.1

7.51

18.0

Including

613

679

66

20.1

3.56

9.2

(1) These holes were oriented to intersect the target at true thickness.

(2) Intercept includes 5 ft. (1.5m) @ 1090 Au g/T

RC= Reverse Circulation sample; core= core samples

Average grades are calculated using uncapped lab assays

The following table provides the objective and observations for each of the reported holes: