The theme "Back to Basics" featured prominently at a government summit marking the 30th anniversary of the promulgation of the Basic Law - the legal foundation of the "one country, two systems" governing model. But increasingly, there is an impression that a new paradigm is being imposed on Hong Kong, raising concerns that there is more than just returning to the fundamentals.
The unfolding new chapter has understandably stoked anxiety and even strong opposition from some quarters in society. At stake is not just relations with Beijing, but also the well-being and development of the city and the nation as a whole. We cannot move forward unless the political differences are resolved.
An immediate challenge is the way forward for the pan-democrats and the Legislative Council, after the highest state organ ruled that those who infringe on national security have no place in public office. A top mainland official went further at last Tuesday's summit, declaring that "those who are anti-China and causing trouble in Hong Kong are out". "This is a political rule under one country, two systems and has become a legal requirement now," he said.
Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China.
Whether there is still room for the opposition in Legco in future remains to be seen. Fifteen members resigned after four allies had been unseated under the new rules earlier this month.
Empty seats on the pan-democratic lawmakers side (right) after they announced en masse resignation. Photo: SCMP/ Dickson Lee alt=Empty seats on the pan-democratic lawmakers side (right) after they announced en masse resignation. Photo: SCMP/ Dickson Lee
The opposition camp has always been branded "anti-China" and troublemakers. Does it mean they would not be allowed to run in elections again? What about the district councils, which are dominated by the opposition at present? Would they play by the new rules and adjust their stance? Would they become even more marginalised, so much so that they would resort to more street confrontations?
There has been suggestion that the pan-democrats should become "loyal opposition", under which non-governing parties may oppose the actions of those in authority while bound by fundamental interests and principles and remain loyal to the source of the power, such as the monarch or constitution.
Reasonable as it seems, the concept usually comes with the possibility for peaceful transition of power between governing and opposition parties. There is clearly no genuine prospect for the pan-democrats to take power under the existing arrangements.