Unlock stock picks and a broker-level newsfeed that powers Wall Street.

Onco-Innovations’ Inka Health Publishes Roche-Sponsored Study Advancing Real-World Oncology Research

In This Article:

VANCOUVER, BC / ACCESS Newswire / April 10, 2025 / Onco-Innovations Limited (CSE:ONCO)(OTCQB:ONNVF)(Frankfurt:W1H, WKN: A3EKSZ) ("Onco" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that its subsidiary, Inka Health Corp. ("Inka Health"), has published a significant and novel study titled Quantitative Bias Analysis for the Assessment of Bias in Comparisons between Synthetic Control Arms (the "Study") published in JAMA Network Open[1] in March 2025, addressing a critical methodological gap in real-world oncology research. The Study[2], sponsored by F. Hoffmann-La Roche (Roche), the fifth-largest pharmaceutical company in the world by revenue[3], presents a novel approach to improving the validity of clinical comparisons drawn from real-world data. Specifically, it provides a method to adjust for unseen differences between patient groups that can lead to misleading results when randomized trials[4] are not possible.

As regulatory bodies increasingly turn to real-world evidence in evaluating new treatments[5], the Study contributes a significant tool for addressing underlying bias in real-world data sources, helping ensure that treatment effects observed outside of traditional trials can be interpreted with greater scientific rigor and confidence.

The Study was led by Alind Gupta, co-founder of Inka Health, in collaboration with Roche and internationally recognized experts in medical research, including Harvard Professor Miguel Hernán[6]. This research builds on Inka Health's efforts to address real-world challenges in oncology trial design, particularly in settings where traditional randomized trials are not feasible. Q-BASEL applies Quantitative Bias Analysis (QBA) to external control arm[7] (ECA) studies, which compare single-arm trial results to outcomes derived from historical or real-world data. These types of studies are increasingly used when randomized controlled trials are not feasible, such as in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC).

The Q-BASEL study emulated 15 treatment comparisons in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) by using real-world patient data to recreate experimental arms from previously conducted randomized trials. The research team applied Quantitative Bias Analysis (QBA) after adjusting for known baseline differences, using evidence from medical literature, clinical trial data, and expert input to account for unmeasured or mismeasured factors. The Study then compared the results from these real-world emulations to the original randomized trial outcomes. The findings showed that applying QBA meaningfully improved the alignment between the two, demonstrating its ability to reduce bias and enhance the reliability of external control arm analyses.