Finding work/life balance in the law; Leadership Academy speakers share their tactics
A Harrington hearing involves a scenario where one party alleges that the litigants had actually entered into an oral settlement agreement which the court should now enforce over the other party's objection. · ALM Media

Editor's Note: The following is a guest column from Maria C. Anderson, associate university counsel in the Office of the President for Montclair State University and a member of the NJSBA's Leadership Academy.

The latest session of the Leadership Academy presented information to assist the fellows in finding work/life balance in the law. The information was presented by six speakers, four of whom were female attorneys, who provided both practical tips on the personal and professional obligation we should all seek for individual self-discovery and assessment. As an attorney who has been practicing for 24 years, I found their shared insights and experience refreshingly honest and consistent with my own experiences. In summary, we were presented with these simple truths: We all must determine who we are and what we need; make choices consistent with our value system; then set boundaries and teach others where they are.

Simplify Life

First, New Jersey Supreme Court Justice Anne Patterson described her journey as a trial attorney that began as an associate in a large law firm, her move to the public sector, a return to private practice as a partner, and now a member of the New Jersey Supreme Court. She provided practical tips for eliminating activities that are time consuming to allow for a personal life. Specifically, she suggested living within a short commuting distance from the office to avoid traffic delays, refraining from work gossip and setting a timer when using technology or browsing the internet, all of which consumes hours in each day.

Hearing her speak reminded me of my own personal experience working for a law firm that required me to commute 40 miles on the Garden State Parkway, and my commute ranged from 45 minutes to four hours on any given day, which when added to a 12- to 14-hour work day, became a crushing burden. When I decided that moving closer to my job was not possible and I accepted a position eight miles from my home, the hours removed from my commute changed my stress level and my personal life overnight.

Focus on Wellness

Cedric Ashley, who is chair of the association's Law Office Management Committee, next presented material that focused upon taking care of yourself in order to regain life balance. He stressed, and I think correctly so, that there is no work/life balance, there is only life balance, and to achieve it we first need to determine what our values are; what we are and are not willing to do; and make choices that work for us.

As a law student, I always understood that there was one path to success: get high grades; be a part of law review; become an associate at a large firm; working day and night, with the ultimate reward of becoming a partner. As I progressed in my career and was lead further away from that path, Ashley's advice affirmed my choice to diverge from this path was the best decision for me. During his presentation, he was asked whether an attorney in a firm, particularly a young associate, has the power to object to certain work that contradicts their values, and it caused me to reflect on my own experience. As a young associate, or even as a newcomer to an organization, it can feel like we are powerless. However, in my experience, when you have demonstrated your ability and become an asset to an organization, it is possible to set boundaries when communicated appropriately. For me, this first happened during my 11th year of practice, while I was working for a law firm as a trial attorney and had a 98 percent win record. I was assigned to represent an individual accused of molesting children under the age of seven. My objection lead not only to the file being reassigned, but to the start of an intelligent conversation about the type of work the firm would handle.