Five New Watchdog Appointees Cleared Chief Judge of Ethics Violations
The Sept. 29 decision by Georgia's newly reconfigured Judicial Qualifications to dismiss ethics complaints against a judge and sharply criticize those who had complained was handled by five new appointees two judges, two lawyers and a commercial real estate developer.

A Sept. 29 decision by Georgia's newly-reconfigured Judicial Qualifications Commission to dismiss ethics complaints against a chief superior court judge, which sharply criticized those who had complained, was handled by five new appointees to the beleaguered watchdog agency.

The quintet of two judges, two lawyers and a commercial real estate developer were appointed July 1 to the third version in less than a year of what was once a constitutionally independent commission but is now under the aegis of the Georgia General Assembly.

Last year's initiative of the state House Judiciary Committee chairman to abolish the independent JQC and place it under the Legislature's control which was backed by House Speaker David Ralston resulted in the passage of a constitutional amendment that, for the first time, gave the Legislature sole power to re-create the JQC and control its operations.

The original seven-member agency was abolished Dec. 31, 2016. Imprecise, often contradictory language in the amendment and the enabling legislation led to the creation of an interim agency with a majority of members appointed by the House speaker and the state Senate president, who is also the lieutenant governor. On June 30, that interim commission, too, was abolished and replaced by a new 10-member commission.

The new commission was, for the first time, split into a seven-person investigative panel where appointees by the speaker and senate president hold the majority a three-member judicial panel, two appointed by the state Supreme Court and a third citizen member appointed by the governor.

The investigative panel reviews judicial ethics complaints and may recommend formal charges, dismiss them or arrange private deals with judges to resolve them without notifying the public. The judicial panel only activates if formal ethics charges are recommended by the investigative panel to preside over ethics tribunals.

In one of its first official actions, the investigative panel reviewed four ethics complaints against Appalachian Chief Superior Court Judge Brenda Weaver that had languished for a year. Weaver was the JQC's chairwoman and president of the state Council of Superior Court Judges when she successfully sought felony indictments in June 2016 against a North Georgia newspaper publisher and his lawyer, a Hiawassee attorney. The indictments, which Weaver soon asked to be dropped, sparked the complaints. But they quickly were sidelined when the entire commission recused last year and then failed to bring in anyone to investigate in their stead.