How Elon Musk stacks up to history's other idiosyncratic CEOs: Morning Brief

In This Article:

Has there ever been a businessperson as unhinged as Elon Musk?

Sure, history is full of them. And Elon is partly an American archetype: A rogue, over-the-top, business mogul.

Included here are some of our most impactful business leaders — Thomas Edison, William Randolph Hearst, and Ted Turner, among others.

Along with their accomplishments, these leaders stretched societal norms and rules, and their eccentricities were inextricably bound with their innovation and acumen. Some also strayed close to — or squarely into — deceit and fraud. Hurtful and illegal behavior seems to come with the territory, which is not to excuse any of them.

The scope of Musk’s global influence far exceeds these forebears, in part because of technology. I think you could also argue his narcissism and need for attention is greater. Same for his depravity.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MAY 02: 
  Elon Musk attends The 2022 Met Gala Celebrating
Elon Musk attends The 2022 Met Gala at The Metropolitan Museum of Art on May 02, 2022 in New York City. (Photo by Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for The Met Museum/Vogue) · Dimitrios Kambouris via Getty Images

Musk has also been anointed by some as the successor to Steve Jobs and America’s leading business light.

To a degree, this is true. But Jobs, who could be rude and unforgiving, wouldn’t have wasted his time with Twitter — either using it or buying it.

Jobs also had a holistic mindset. You don’t hear Musk and or any of his Paypal mafioso opining about calligraphy, rock music, Eastern religion, or much culture at all.

In fact, Musk is a mastermind of the post-Jobsian, engineer-driven, li-bro-tarian mindset prevalent amongst leaders in Silicon Valley. It’s data uber alles, fuzzy feelings be damned!

What has that given us? Some great technology, sure, but also a shocking disregard for privacy, democracy, and civility. Including, apparently, merger agreements.

And when it comes to Elon Musk and Twitter, this is where I think things stand today:

  • No one knows how Twitter v. Musk will turn out.

  • The lawyers will make tons of money.

  • No one knows what Elon wants — except to be in the spotlight.

  • Running a social media company is outside Elon’s core competency.

  • Not censoring content on Twitter is naive. You can’t allow pedophiles, opioid dealers and terrorists to run unfettered. You acknowledge there are limits and own them. Steve Jobs blocked porn from the Apple ecosystem.

  • The more Twitter frees up its content, which is supposed to grow the audience, the less valuable it becomes as companies don’t want their ads near junk.

  • Yes, Twitter is worth $28 billion and Meta is worth $445 billion. But let’s not forget Snap is worth $22 billion and Pinterest only $13 billion. Still, it’s fair to say that Twitter, with its huge influence in politics, media and celebrity — that those latter two don’t have — punches below its weight.