Is money safe in banks? More depositors are wondering after SVB collapsed

In This Article:

More people are wondering just how safe their money is in a bank after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.

Online searches asking that question have jumped as Americans worry their bank could be the next to fail.

That fear hasn't subsided even after major U.S. banks injected more than $30 billion of deposits in First Republic Bank last week and UBS bought Swiss banking giant Credit Suisse over the weekend.

Experts say there’s no reason customers should worry about money kept in banks that are covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, especially since very few depositors surpass the $250,000 limit on the insurance.

And with Signature and SVB, the government took extraordinary steps to insure deposits above that limit.

Clark Kendall, president and CEO of Kendall Capital, a wealth management firm, said the government's actions set a precedent for any other bank failures. "The FDIC will now step up and ensure all depositors," he thinks.

What caused the SVB collapse?

Silicon Valley Bank's collapse was tied to faltering tech stocks and interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve.

The bank’s customers – mostly startups and other tech companies – were in need of cash after venture capital funding started to decline. Those customers began withdrawing their SVB deposits to pay their expenses.

SVB didn't anticipate so many withdrawals at the same time. And when that occurred, the bank was ill-prepared with minimal deposits on hand and most of its money tied up in U.S. Treasuries.

Normally, this is considered a safe long-term investment, but the Fed’s interest rate hikes made the value of the Treasuries tumble.

A customer stands outside of the shuttered Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) headquarters on March 10, 2023, in Santa Clara, Calif.
A customer stands outside of the shuttered Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) headquarters on March 10, 2023, in Santa Clara, Calif.

SVB had to start selling those bonds at a loss to meet withdrawal requests, but it wasn’t enough.

Last week, the bank said that it suffered a $1.8 billion after-tax loss and would sell $2.25 billion in new shares, which spooked investors. The bank's stock plummeted and depositors moved to take out more money than the bank could provide. Two days later, regulators seized the bank’s assets.

Opinion: SVB's failure poses serious challenge for America's innovation economy

Opinion: Blaming Silicon Valley Bank collapse on diversity or 'wokeness' gives away Republican game

A week after the FDIC took over SVB, its parent company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

How is this different from 2008 bank collapses?

While SVB's meltdown and the stress rippling through the banking system may stir memories of the 2008 financial crisis, it has little in common with the earlier episode.