New Millennium Responds to Dissident Shareholders

CALGARY, ALBERTA--(Marketwired - Mar 3, 2016) - New Millennium Iron Corp. ("NML" or the "Company") (NML.TO) has responded to the information circular recently issued by a group of dissident shareholders who have requisitioned a special meeting in an attempt to effectively take control of the Company through significant changes to the Board's composition that include four director nominees. The special meeting will be held March 15, 2016, in Toronto.

Howard Lutley, an independent director of NML and Chairman of a Special Committee responsible to coordinate and oversee the Company's response to the requisition notice from the dissident shareholders said, "The dissident group continues to make misleading statements in their effort to take control of NML's Board. In the face of difficult market conditions over the past two years, NML has taken appropriate steps to balance its short- and long-term interests, including restructuring to preserve liquidity, Board renewal and management team succession, and building on past investments to create a new strategy for monetizing the Company's taconite property assets in the Labrador Trough. In attempting to stop this momentum, the dissidents are jeopardizing NML's future and reputation by failing to acknowledge the reality of project lead times in our industry and the need for maintaining relationships with prospective business partners, governments, First Nations and communities in general."

In a letter being mailed to shareholders, NML reiterated concerns stemming from the dissidents' information circular:

  • NML's highly qualified Board already brings many years of relevant mining and capital markets experience, whereas the dissidents have nominated directors who collectively do not possess a similar level of qualification.

  • The dissidents, up to now, have presented no detailed plan for building shareholder value or developing NML's taconite assets. Instead, they suggest placing NML in care and maintenance, a costly step that would prevent the application today of know-how from recent investments to new strategic considerations, and leave the Company unprepared for a timely response to market opportunities as iron ore prices recover.

  • Comments in the dissidents' circular on activity in the Labrador Trough, executive compensation and NML's corporate governance are misleading or demonstrate a lack of knowledge of the issues.

  • The dissidents state that they may enter into agreements whereby brokers are paid solicitation fees for common shares voted in favor of the removal of NML's current directors, fixing the number of directors at seven and the appointment of dissident nominees. This would be tantamount to buying shareholder votes.

  • Payment to brokers for soliciting votes in a proxy context is a practice that has been actively discouraged by market regulators. Shareholders should question not only why the dissidents feel the need to consider paying solicitation fees, but also whether this is an indication of the questionable decision-making that would prevail if the dissidents were in control of NML.

  • While citing what they view as poor disclosure by NML, the dissidents have not disclosed whether they plan to reimburse themselves for proxy solicitation fees, including solicitation fees paid to brokers, if they gain control of NML's board.