Melcor REIT Announces a Third Independent Proxy Advisor Recommends Unitholders Vote for the Plan of Arrangement

In This Article:

Melcor Real Estate Investment Trust
Melcor Real Estate Investment Trust
  • Endorsement from Egan-Jones follows earlier recommendation from ISS and Glass Lewis to vote FOR Arrangement

  • ISS cites “large premium cash exit” and “meaningful downside risks of non-approval” in its report

  • Unitholders who have questions or need assistance in voting should contact Laurel Hill Advisory Group by telephone at 1-877-452-7184 (North American Toll Free) or 1-416-304-0211 (Outside North America), or by email at assistance@laurelhill.com

EDMONTON, Alberta, Nov. 20, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Melcor Real Estate Investment Trust (“Melcor REIT” or the “REIT”) is pleased to announce that in addition to Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) and Glass Lewis’ recommendations, Egan-Jones Proxy Services (“Egan-Jones”) has also recommended unitholders of Melcor REIT (“Unitholders”) vote FOR the previously announced plan of arrangement (the “Arrangement”) with Melcor Developments Ltd. (“MRD”), whereby, among other steps, the outstanding trust units of the REIT will be redeemed in exchange for $4.95 per unit held (the “Consideration”), through a series of steps outlined in the management information circular mailed to Unitholders, filed under the REIT’s profile on SEDAR+ (http://sedarplus.com) and on the REIT’s website at https://melcorreit.ca/special-meeting/.

As an independent proxy advisory firm, ISS has approximately 3,400 clients including many of the world’s leading institutional investors who rely on ISS’ objective and impartial analysis to make important voting decisions. Egan-Jones, established in 2002 by Egan-Jones Ratings Co., is a leading independent provider of proxy vote guidance and vote issuance for a variety of retail, institutional, and governmental investors.

Together, the committee of independent trustees of the REIT (the “Independent Committee”), the board of trustees of the REIT (the “Board”) (with cross-trustees abstaining), ISS, Glass Lewis, and Egan-Jones have all reached the same conclusion: Unitholders should vote FOR the Arrangement.

Notwithstanding that ISS expressed some concerns with certain parts of the process, ISS has recommended that Unitholders vote in favour of the Arrangement for several reasons, including those outlined below, among others:

REJECTION OF USE OF IFRS NAV AS RELEVANT VALUATION METRIC

ISS went to great lengths to consider whether IFRS net asset value per unit (“IFRS NAV”) (as calculated by ISS) was a relevant metric to value the REIT, and their analysis concluded that there is no basis for relying on IFRS NAV in valuing the REIT’s unit:

…important to recognize that [IFRS] NAV appears to depart from: (i) how the REIT's units have traded on a historical basis; (ii) how the equity analyst community values the REIT; (iii) where the REITs peers were trading around the time of announcement; and (iv) how the REIT has been valued according to two fairness opinions and an independent formal valuation.