Meet Crypto’s New Best Friend: Fiat

This post is part of CoinDesk’s 2019 Year in Review, a collection of 100 op-eds, interviews and takes on the state of blockchain and the world. Halsey Minor started CNET, and was involved in a string of companies. Today he leads Live Planet VR and the VideoCoin Network, video infrastructure for the blockchain-enabled internet.

I started in the crypto industry in 2013 launching Uphold, the payment service and exchange that created one of the first stablecoins. It still allows users to buy and trade bitcoin and 15 fiat currencies today. At the time, Coinbase required traders to sell bitcoin and send the money back to their bank accounts. It had no USD service. We wanted to give traders the ability to convert bitcoin to their native fiat currencies and back again without leaving the ecosystem and to send funds all the way back to their banks. Back then, holding fiat “stablecoins” on a service like ours was not well liked in a bitcoin-or-nothing world.

In 2019, as traders sought more pricing stability, we saw the rise of Tether and its many competitors. Stablecoins have become the solution to move fiat among exchanges without using banks directly. Fiat trading on blockchain has exploded and US dollar-backed stablecoins have attracted more than $4.5 billion of investment. What this proves is that fiat and crypto were never enemies. They were complementary in any effective trading ecosystem, and both have prospered.

Related: It’s Time to Walk-the-Talk on Decentralized Governance

For convenience, crypto-users need to be able to use their bank accounts to pay for products and services. If, instead, you force them to open an exchange account and to use some new, volatile form of money with low liquidity just to use your service – then you’ve created significant friction. If blockchain-based businesses are to succeed, they must be as convenient to use as non-blockchain services.

At VideoCoin, a company building a decentralized video infrastructure platform, we asked ourselves a simple question. If Paramount Pictures or 20th Century Fox were a VideoCoin customer and they wanted to spend $100,000 a month on our video encoding service, would they be willing to open an exchange account, hire a trader to avoid driving the price up at acquisition, and then deposit funds whose value on our services would fluctuate every minute of every day? You see the problem, here.

Our competitors at Amazon Web Services let customers use a regular bank account in all its forms – credit card, wire transfer, ACH, and so on. These methods are simple to use and the value they deposit does not fluctuate significantly from moment to moment. Even though we are building a service that is dramatically lower priced, the payment friction would be so great it would substantially hurt our ability to compete.