Maybe Biden should quit while he’s ahead

What if President Biden signed the big infrastructure bill Congress just passed … and then nothing much happened for the next 12 months? No more “build back better” legislation, no more Democratic infighting over social-welfare spending, no more kowtowing to Joe Manchin?

If Biden’s sole focus were regaining his popularity and giving his party a fighting chance in next year’s midterm elections, he might just abandon the huge green-energy and social-welfare bill Democrats are still trying to pass, which could cost as much as $2 trillion. This tax-and-spending package highlights a major rift between liberal Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and the rest of the party’s progressive wing, and moderates such as Manchin, the ubiquitous senator from West Virginia. Divisions are so deep that Democrats may not be able to muster a working majority to pass the bill, even though they have slim majorities, on paper, in both the House and the Senate.

[Click here to get Rick Newman’s stories by email.]

The infrastructure bill is popular, with 66% support—and 57% support among Republicans—in a recent Harris poll. The social-welfare bill is not so popular. In the Harris poll, 58% said they oppose it, while just 42% say they support it. Democrats are going to the mat for new policies that have no voter mandate and might backfire if Dems actually manage to pass them.

What are they thinking? Part of it is surely hubris, as if Biden’s win in 2020 was something much more than a rejection of Donald Trump’s corrupt presidency. Democrats seem to think voters will love more federal benefits and a bigger government role in the economy, if only they get a chance to try it out. But this we-know-better attitude is perilous. Biden’s approval rating has plunged recently, despite generous new benefits flowing into people’s bank accounts, such as the expanded child tax credit Congress passed in March. Democrats also seem oblivious to a similar mistake Republicans made in 2017, when they thought the Trump tax cut law would endear voters to them indefinitely. Instead, Republicans lost control of the House in midterm elections 11 months later.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer D-Md., accompanied by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., speaks to reporters at the Capitol in Washington, Friday, Nov. 5, 2021, as the House is considering President Joe Biden's domestic policy package. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer D-Md., accompanied by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., speaks to reporters at the Capitol in Washington, Friday, Nov. 5, 2021, as the House is considering President Joe Biden's domestic policy package. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana) · ASSOCIATED PRESS

Some Democrats may also feel morally obligated to pass legislation they feel would benefit millions of Americans, regardless of the political cost. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D., Wash.), who leads a group of progressive Democrats, recently said it would be worth losing control of Congress “if we’re making people’s lives better.” The flaw in that logic, however, is that Democrats would be ceding control to an opposition party that might undo their virtuous policies. Wouldn’t more moderate policies that keep Democrats in power be better?