New market for liver disease spawns race for better testing

(Repeats for additional subscribers)

By Bill Berkrot

NEW YORK, March 16 (Reuters) - As drugmakers develop new medicines to battle a liver disease epidemic, they have created an urgent need for better diagnostics to select patients for treatment and assess their drugs' effectiveness.

About 30 percent of people in the U.S. now suffer from fatty liver diseases, such as NASH (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis), fueled by obesity, diabetes and over-indulgent lifestyles, according to the American Liver Foundation. Without treatment, sufferers can develop advanced damage, including the scarring known as fibrosis; cirrhosis, which destroys liver function; and even cancer.

For now, testing patients in trials of experimental medicines involves a liver biopsy, a painful, expensive and potentially risky test. Its accuracy is also limited as it draws just a tiny piece of the liver, which may not be affected uniformly by disease.

"It's a pretty nasty test involving a needle five inches long you plunge blindly into a patient's side," said Dr. Scott Friedman, dean of therapeutic discovery at Mt. Sinai Hospital in New York and one of the world's top liver disease experts. "We don't like to do them. You can't do more than one at the beginning, one at the end (of a trial). So there's this frantic effort now to develop (diagnostics) that will give us the information necessary to know if a drug is working."

More than a dozen drugmakers are working on new treatments for fatty liver disease. Frontrunners include Gilead Sciences Inc, a leader in the hepatitis C field, Intercept Pharmaceuticals and France's Genfit. If approved, each of their drugs could reap sales of $10 billion annually, Reuters reported last year.

They will find eager partners in several small companies, such as KineMed and Perspectum Diagnostics, often spawned from academic or hospital research, which are working on alternatives to liver biopsy.

Some of the new techniques use MRI scans that view the entire liver. Others involve blood tests to measure liver scarring or function. One diagnostic evaluates liver damage via exhaled breath. They could replace biopsy or be used to provide interim results during lengthy studies.

U.S. health regulators "recognize that biopsy is an inadequate way to power trials," Friedman said. "We can't get interim data about efficacy."

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration declined to discuss tests in development. The agency "supports innovation, especially where new tests and diagnostic procedures might eliminate or decrease the need for an invasive procedure such as a liver biopsy," a spokesman said.