LinkedIn To Acquire Glint: Major Move in Employee Engagement Market

Originally published by Josh Bersin on LinkedIn: LinkedIn To Acquire Glint: Major Move in Employee Engagement Market

This week at the LinkedIn Talent Connect conference, LinkedIn announced a groundbreaking move: plans to acquire Glint, one of the market leaders in employee engagement solutions.

Glint, which is a company I’ve been talking with since its formation, provides one of the most scalable and AI-driven solutions for employee surveys and sensing, and the company has been growing rapidly. The CEO and founding team have Silicon Valley technology pedigrees, so they took a technology-centric approach to this market from the beginning.

While it may seem simple to build an employee survey (there are hundreds of tools to do this), actually deploying a “listening architecture” that collects data from annual surveys, new hire surveys, exit surveys, and dozens of other moments in an employee’s career, is actually very hard. IBM acquired Kenexa in an attempt to go after this market, and after two years of R&D essentially gave up on the platform and decided to exit the business. So did CEB (now Gartner).

Why is this so hard? Because the problem of surveying and collecting data is really more of an analytics and AI problem than it is a survey problem.

Every time you collect data from your employees you need to know what department they’re in, what activity you’re surveying, and all sorts of demographic data about their location, time of day, and other work-related information. Did you know that opinion surveys taken in the morning are more positive than those taken in the afternoon? Or that people who take surveys on mobile devices are often more positive than those who sit at their computers?

Then, as you collect all this data, you want to combine, compare, and aggregate it with lots of other information. How can we correlate survey data against sales productivity? Turnover? Customer satisfaction and retention? All these are common questions companies ask, and when the platform is clunky companies have to build their own data warehouses or do lots of extra work in Excel or another tool.

Third, there’s much more analysis to come. Now we want data on organizational network analysis (communication patterns), sentiment (tone and tenor of surveys and emails), and even want to compare data on work activity. One company installed heat detectors under the desk to determine when people were sitting at their desks (they were trying to get people to come into the office), and many now look at badge-reader data, travel data, and even smart badges that sense stress in your voice.