Unlock stock picks and a broker-level newsfeed that powers Wall Street.

LIFT reports laboratory metallurgical recoveries averaging 79% producing a high-quality spodumene concentrate grading 5.83% Li2O at the Yellowknife Lithium Project

In This Article:

Li-FT Power Ltd.
Li-FT Power Ltd.

VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Sept. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Li-FT Power Ltd. (“LIFT” or the “Company”) (TSXV: LIFT) (OTCQX: LIFFF) (Frankfurt: WS0) is pleased to report results from the metallurgical sampling program completed in 2023 and 2024 across eight spodumene deposits within the Yellowknife Lithium Project, Northwest Territories, Canada. Metallurgical test work comprised of heavy liquid separation (HLS) testing, dense media separation (DMS) testing, and batch flotation testing was executed by SGS Canada Inc. (“SGS”) in Lakefield, Ontario. Testing was completed on samples from the Big East (BigE), Big West (BigW), Nite, Ki, Echo, Fi Main (FiM), Fi Southwest (FiSW), and Hi pegmatites.

Table 1- Summary of Results

Sample

Flowsheet

Wt.

Assays (%)

Recovery (%)

(%)

Li

Li2O

Fe2O3

Li

Fe2O3

BigE

Two-stage DMS + Flotation

21.1

2.7

5.79

0.76

87.4

29.3

BigW

11.1

2.67

5.75

0.76

81.4

16.0

Nite

22.4

2.69

5.78

0.74

89.3

28.7

Ki

18.4

2.8

6.02

0.58

84.8

22.8

Echo

15.7

2.87

6.17

0.85

87.1

13.8

FiM

Single-stage DMS + Flotation

15.8

2.6

5.59

0.49

60.8

14.7

FiSW

17.9

2.68

5.76

0.45

72.3

14.5

Hi

16.7

2.69

5.77

0.46

70.1

14.6

 

 

 

 

5.83

 

79.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Spodumene Concentrate Grade (Li2O %)

5.83

 

 

 

Average Global Lithium Recovery (%)

79.1

 

 

 

Francis MacDonald, CEO of LIFT comments, “We are very pleased to report that the comprehensive metallurgical testing studies in preparation for our upcoming Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) yielded positive results. Studies notably included pilot-scale DMS testing that indicated that this lower-cost separation method is suitable for the spodumene-enriched pegmatite dikes that are targeted for the more accessible early mining sites that we envision could comprise lithium production in the district for a generation or more. As such the results of these important studies underpin the high value potential for our Yellowknife lithium project.

Details of metallurgical program

Lithium chemical analysis of the metallurgical samples was performed by sodium peroxide fusion digestion followed by inductively coupled plasma optical spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Whole rock analysis (WRA) was performed by borate fusion and X-ray Fluorescence (XRF). Elemental compositions of the pegmatite samples are presented in Table 2. Pegmatite sample grades ranged from 0.86% to 1.46% Li2O and from 0.24% to 0.48% Fe2O3.

Table 2: Chemical analysis of the metallurgical samples

Component

Composition (%)

BigE

BigW

Nite

FiM

FiSW

HI

KI

Echo

Li
Li2O
Fe2O3
SiO2
Al2O3
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2O
MnO

0.63
1.35
0.44
73.6
16.2
0.16
0.24
4.06
2.56
0.06

0.40
0.86
0.34
73.8
15.7
0.07
0.28
4.52
2.88
0.05

0.67
1.44
0.48
73.9
16.0
0.06
0.24
3.77
2.55
0.10

0.68
1.46
0.27
73.0
16.4
0.07
0.30
3.93
2.57
0.02

0.62
1.33
0.29
74.0
16.1
0.07
0.26
3.97
2.76
0.03

0.63
1.35
0.39
73.4
16.2
0.08
0.30
3.83
2.63
0.03

0.60
1.29
0.24
73.5
16.1
0.08
0.28
3.92
2.79
0.02

0.56
1.20
0.33
73.1
16.4
0.10
0.24
4.53
2.53
0.04

The mineralogical compositions of the metallurgical samples were determined using the semi-quantitative XRD and are shown in Table 2 . Spodumene concentrations in the pegmatites ranged from 11.0% to 18.3% and are in line with lithium concentrations (i.e., spodumene is the dominant lithium-bearing mineral identified). Minor amounts (1%) of triphylite (LiFe(PO4)) was detected in the FiM sample. Muscovite concentrations in the pegmatite samples ranged from 4.5% to 7.8%. Minor quantities (<1%) of iron-bearing minerals (e.g., chlorite, chlinochlore) were detected.