Leading Independent Proxy Advisory Firm Glass Lewis Joins Institutional Shareholder Services in Recommending MMLP Unitholders Vote "FOR" the Transaction with MRMC

In This Article:

Glass Lewis Report Highlights Robust Conflicts Committee Process, Premium Value Delivered through Transaction and Risks Associated with Standalone Plan

MMLP Urges Unitholders to Follow the Recommendations of the Leading Proxy Advisory Services; Vote "FOR" the Pending Transaction on WHITE Proxy Card Today

KILGORE, Texas, December 18, 2024--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Martin Midstream Partners L.P. ("MMLP") (Nasdaq: MMLP) is pleased to announce that leading independent proxy advisory firm Glass Lewis & Co. ("Glass Lewis") joins Institutional Shareholder Services Inc ("ISS") in recommending that unitholders vote "FOR" the pending transaction with Martin Resource Management Corporation ("MRMC") in advance of the upcoming MMLP Special Meeting of unitholders, which is scheduled for December 30, 2024.

In its report dated December 18, 2024, Glass Lewis stated1:

  • "…we believe the Conflicts Committee undertook a reasonably comprehensive review of all available and actionable strategic alternatives, successfully negotiating a meaningful increase in the merger consideration offered by Parent. In light of the findings from the financial advisors’ valuation analyses of the Company, as well as our review of the Company's relative performance to its peers, we believe the merger consideration represents an attractive exit valuation and premium for the Company's unaffiliated unitholders."

  • "…we recognize that the only available and viable alternatives for the Company were to either negotiate a going-private transaction with Parent or to continue on a standalone basis."

  • "…the Company is not expected to make any material increases to its distributions in the near term, as it prioritizes shoring up its balance sheet. Furthermore, the Company’s limited growth prospects only serve to underscore the necessity of a near-term focus on deleveraging. Considering these circumstances, we believe that pursuing a going-private transaction at a meaningful market premium is likely to be superior alternative for the Company's unaffiliated unitholders compared to maintaining the status quo."

  • "…we believe that the Conflicts Committee’s efforts to negotiate improved terms demonstrate a good faith attempt to balance the interests of unaffiliated unitholders with the inherent structural limitations imposed by Parent’s control over the General Partner."

  • "For clarity, the Dissidents are not unitholders and thus do not hold any voting rights in the Company."