Las Cruces is not immune from rental scams
Gary Sandler
Gary Sandler

A few years ago, the Las Cruces Police Department reported that three local families had fallen victim to rental fraud. In one case, a family who was relocating to Las Cruces from California was scammed out of $1,000 while trying to rent a home listed on Craigslist. In another report, an NMSU student was conned out of $500.00 by someone pretending to be the owner of a property.

This is not breaking news. Both the Office of the Attorney General and LCPD have asked landlords and tenants to be especially diligent when transacting business to rent or lease a home. The warnings apply to both landlords and tenants because both are subject to being scammed. Here are a couple of examples of how the rip-offs are perpetrated.

In Taos, a landlord became suspicious when he received a check for $5,000 from a Craigslist rental applicant who was only required to tender a deposit of $1,500. The prospective renter later emailed the landlord to say that his “sponsor” had uncovered the overpayment “situation” and instructed the landlord to wire transfer the $3,500 difference to a furniture company that was handling the move for the tenant. As you might have guessed, the prospective tenant’s check was bogus. The landlord was lucky that he uncovered the scheme before sending the perpetrator $3,500 of his hard-earned wages.

A few years ago, the Las Cruces Police Department reported that three local families had fallen victim to rental fraud.
A few years ago, the Las Cruces Police Department reported that three local families had fallen victim to rental fraud.

In another case, an Albuquerque man nearly fell victim to rental fraud when he responded to a Craigslist ad for a two-bedroom, two-bath home in the Northeast Heights area. The notice was purportedly placed by a property owner whose ad read: “JUST TRANSFERED TO WEST AFRICA, WE ARE LOOKING TO RENT THIS HOME TO A RELIABLE TRUSTWORTHY TENANT.” The prospective tenant was asked to send a $1,000 deposit to the property owner. After unsuccessful attempts to locate the property in question, the wise tenant decided to terminate negotiations with the fictitious landlord. This was the very scam used to steal the $1,000 from the California couple.

Situations such as these constitute many of the run-of-the-mill types of con jobs that have been perpetrated against landlords and tenants for decades. Over the past few years, however, cases in which property owners defraud their own renters have also been reported to authorities. In those instances, landlords fleece their tenants by contracting to rent or lease their homes to them while knowing that their property is in foreclosure, and that it will be just a matter of time until the tenant is evicted. The owner pockets the rents but doesn’t send the money to the lender.

How can landlords and tenants protect themselves from rental scam artists? The first step in rental fraud prevention is to look for the red flags.