In This Article:
NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / September 17, 2019 / The Klein Law Firm announces that class action complaints have been filed on behalf of shareholders of the following companies. There is no cost to participate in the suit. If you suffered a loss, you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff.
Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc (KPTI)
Class Period: on behalf of shareholders of Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. who: (1) purchased shares of Karyopharm's common stock between March 2, 2017 and February 22, 2019, inclusive; (2) purchased Karyopharm shares in or traceable to the Company's public offering of common stock conducted on or around April 28, 2017; or (3) purchased Karyopharm shares in or traceable to the Company's public offering of common stock conducted on or around May 7, 2018.
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 23, 2019
During the class period, Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc allegedly made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: Throughout the Class Period, the Company continued to tout the commercial prospects for selinexor and consistently described selinexor as having a "predictable and manageable tolerability profile" and a "very nice safety profile," and assured investors that it was "well tolerated" by patients. Karyopharm also claimed that selinexor had the potential to be used as a new treatment for MM, with limited and manageable side effects. As a result of these misrepresentations, Karyopharm shares traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.
Learn about your recoverable losses in KPTI: http://www.kleinstocklaw.com/pslra-1/karyopharm-therapeutics-inc-loss-submission-form?id=3563&from=1
GTT Communications, Inc. (GTT)
Class Period: February 26, 2018 to July 1, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 30, 2019
Throughout the class period, GTT Communications, Inc. allegedly made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) following GTT's acquisition of Interoute Communications Holdings S.A., there were delays in migrating Interoute's legacy systems and processes into GTT's client management database system; (2) Interoute had made a strategic priority shift to sell cloud services that was a higher percentage of Interoute's sales in the two years leading up to the acquisition; (3) a material percentage of the Interoute sales representatives were not productive at selling GTT's core cloud networking services; (4) GTT was unable to yield as many Interoute salespeople because Interoute had hired many sales people focused on cloud services and allowed underperforming sales representatives to remain at Interoute; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' public statements were materially false and/or misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.