Ken Griffin Says "Holding Cash Would've Been the Best." But Is Defense Really the Right Play for Long-Term Investors?

In This Article:

Key Points

  • Volatility around tariffs is causing some top investors to question their thinking.

  • Ken Griffin's comments show that there can be benefits to holding cash.

  • The optimal percentage of cash to hold can depend on a number of factors.

  • 10 stocks we like better than S&P 500 Index ›

How much cash to hold is one of the trickier questions in investing.

There are good arguments both for being fully invested and for keeping some dry power on the sidelines, and the volatility of the current stock market with a trade war brewing and the risk of a recession rising is causing some investors to rethink their strategies.

One of them is Ken Griffin, the head of Citadel, which is generally considered to be the best-performing hedge fund of all time.

In an interview with Bloomberg, Griffin said, "In retrospect, perhaps holding cash would've been the best way to navigate this, but that's so contrary to our culture of always trying to find ways to create value in the markets."

The words "Market data" in a newspaper under a magnifying glass.
Image source: Getty Images.

Hindsight is 20/20

Griffin's comments underscore something obvious but also telling about investing. Having cash available is certainly advantageous when the market falls as it did in April with the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) nearly entering a bear market, though few investors anticipated that crash.

However, there were signs of rising volatility prior to the crash following the "Liberation Day" announcement. Stocks were already pulling back from peaks before the inauguration, President Donald Trump had already announced new tariffs, and consumer sentiment was quickly weakening.

It's unclear if Griffin meant that moving to cash made sense given the risks around tariffs, which were arguably visible before the April crash. Going to cash can also make sense as a way to outperform a volatile market, at least when asset prices are falling, which could be another interpretation of his comments.

Holding cash can be beneficial, but it's also a mistake to forget that hindsight offers a clearer perspective than investors had at the time.

You can't time the market

The wrong lesson to take away from Griffin's statement is that it's a good idea to hold cash in order to time the market, which is generally difficult, if not impossible.

No one knows for sure when the market is at a top or a bottom, and similarly no one knows when it's about to crash.

The advantage of keeping some cash on the sidelines is that you can capitalize on market crashes when they occur, but knowing when they're coming ahead of time is unlikely.